Merge pull request 'docs(prd-0023): smolmachines bottle backend' (#53) from prd-0023-smolmachines-backend into main
test / unit (push) Successful in 21s
test / integration (push) Successful in 40s

This commit was merged in pull request #53.
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-27 02:16:11 -04:00
+606
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,606 @@
# PRD 0023: smolmachines bottle backend
- **Status:** Draft
- **Author:** didericis
- **Created:** 2026-05-26
## Summary
Ship a second concrete `BottleBackend`
`SmolmachinesBottleBackend`, selected via
`CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines` — that runs each bottle inside
a per-agent microVM on macOS. The egress topology is enforced by
**gvproxy** (gvisor-tap-vsock), a userspace TCP/IP stack the guest's
virtio-net device is wired into via `VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment`.
gvproxy's only outbound configuration is an explicit per-bottle
port-forward set into a **single per-bottle sidecar container** that
bundles pipelock + egress + git-gate + supervise behind one supervised
init. Everything else — the host's LAN, the host's loopback
services, the public internet — is unreachable from the guest by
construction.
The sidecar bundle is the same image PRD 0024 introduces for the
docker backend; this PRD consumes it. Inside the bundle, egress is
pipelock's internal upstream over localhost and is not exposed
externally. gvproxy port-forwards three external ports into the
bundle: pipelock (for `HTTPS_PROXY`), git-gate (for git push), and
supervise (for MCP).
This explicitly rejects libkrun's TSI ("Transport Socket Interface")
allowlist as the network primitive. TSI's `--outbound-localhost-only`
is permissive on the entire `127.0.0.0/8` range with no
destination-port filter — the agent can dial any host-side service
bound to loopback (a local Postgres, an IDE plugin, a different
bottle's pipelock). That's the wrong default for a malicious-agent
threat model; see "Why gvproxy, not TSI" below.
The Docker backend ships unchanged; this is opt-in via the existing
env-var selector. The acceptance gate is PRD 0022's
`tests/integration/test_sandbox_escape.py` running green against
`CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines`.
## Problem
`agent-vm-isolation.md` argues for hardware-isolated microVMs over
container-based bottles on macOS; `smolmachines-as-vm-backend.md`
evaluates smolmachines as the lifecycle wrapper. Today, the only
backend in the registry is Docker
(`claude_bottle/backend/__init__.py:_BACKENDS = {"docker": ...}`),
and four things motivate a second one now:
- **Network reach beyond pipelock.** The threat model is a malicious
agent attempting to dial something on the operator's *local
network* (`192.168.x.x` services, the home router, a coworker's
laptop on the same Wi-Fi) or *host's loopback* (a local database,
an editor plugin, another bottle's sidecar) without traversing
pipelock. The Docker backend's `--internal` network blocks the
first; nothing in the current stack blocks the second cleanly.
This PRD's gvproxy-based design closes both gaps: the guest can
only reach the explicit port-forward list, period.
- **Isolation ceiling.** On macOS the Docker backend's agent
container shares Docker Desktop's host VM with every other
bottle. Container escape from claude-code lands the agent inside
that shared VM. A per-bottle microVM gets hardware page tables
via `Hypervisor.framework`; cross-bottle isolation becomes
enforced by the CPU's MMU instead of namespace bookkeeping.
- **PRD 0022 is backend-agnostic by design** but currently only
exercises the Docker backend. The suite was written with
`CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND` selection in mind precisely so the
smolmachines path could be validated against the same five
attacks. Until a second backend exists, the abstraction is
unproven.
- **CI carve-outs.** Most bottle-bringup integration tests skip
under `GITEA_ACTIONS=true` because act_runner shares the host
Docker socket but not the host filesystem. A microVM path
doesn't share that constraint shape (it has its own, but
different), so adding the backend forces the abstraction to be
clean in places where Docker-specific assumptions have been
tolerated.
## Why gvproxy, not TSI
libkrun's TSI hijacks guest socket syscalls inside the VMM and
opens the actual sockets from the host process, with a CIDR
allowlist gate. That works fine for blocking LAN reach (don't
allowlist `192.168.0.0/16`, agent can't dial it). But TSI's
`--outbound-localhost-only` permits the *entire* `127.0.0.0/8`
range across all ports — there is no destination-port filter at
the TSI layer (`smolmachines-as-vm-backend.md` flags this in the
"`--allow-host` semantics" caveat). For our threat model that
means any host-loopback service is reachable from the guest.
gvproxy implements a full userspace TCP/IP stack on the host side
of a `VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment` unixgram socket. The
guest has a real virtio-net device; gvproxy is its gateway. The
guest can only reach what gvproxy is configured to forward —
typically a single port forward to the per-bottle pipelock —
and DNS resolves NXDOMAIN by default. There is no "permissive
loopback" mode to mis-configure; if it's not in `port_forwards`,
the guest cannot reach it.
That property — *explicit allowlist by port forward, not CIDR*
is the load-bearing reason this PRD chooses gvproxy. TSI shows up
once more in this doc, under Non-goals, where it is closed off.
## Goals / Success Criteria
The feature works when all of the following are observable on a
macOS host with smolmachines installed:
- `CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines python3 cli.py start <agent>`
brings up a microVM, runs claude-code inside it, and tears it
down on exit. Same y/N preflight UX as Docker — only the
resolved-runtime line differs.
- The sandbox-escape suite in `tests/integration/test_sandbox_escape.py`
runs green against the smolmachines backend (all five attack
categories blocked).
- Selecting the backend on a host without `smolvm` installed dies
at startup with an install pointer; no silent fall-through to
Docker.
- Active bottles show up under
`python3 cli.py list-bottles` regardless of backend.
- `python3 cli.py stop <bottle>` and orphan cleanup work for both
Docker bottles and smolmachines bottles via the same CLI surface.
The feature is **done** when all of the following ship:
- A new `claude_bottle/backend/smolmachines/` subpackage exists,
mirroring the layout of `claude_bottle/backend/docker/`
(`backend.py`, `bottle.py`, `bottle_plan.py`,
`bottle_cleanup_plan.py`, `prepare.py`, `launch.py`,
`cleanup.py`, `util.py`, and a `provision/` subpackage for the
five `provision_*` methods).
- `SmolmachinesBottleBackend` registered under the
`"smolmachines"` key in `claude_bottle/backend/__init__.py:_BACKENDS`.
- Per-bottle Smolfile generation: a runtime-rendered TOML written
to the bottle's stage dir, analogous to the compose file the
Docker backend writes today. The Smolfile pins `command`,
`env`, and a virtio-net device backed by a unixgram socket
pointed at the per-bottle gvproxy. There is no TSI
`--allow-cidr` / `--outbound-localhost-only` / `--allow-host`
in the Smolfile — TSI is not used.
- Per-bottle gvproxy: one `gvproxy` process per bottle, started
before the VM, listening on a unixgram socket the VM's
virtio-net device hooks into. The gvproxy config has up to
three `port_forwards` entries (pipelock / git-gate / supervise
— git-gate and supervise only when the bottle uses them) all
pointing at the per-bottle sidecar bundle's exposed ports, plus
a DNS section that resolves only `proxy.internal`. Every other
hostname returns NXDOMAIN; every other destination is
unreachable.
- Per-bottle sidecar bundle: one container per bottle running the
bundle image defined in PRD 0024. The bundle exposes up to
three host ports (pipelock for `HTTPS_PROXY`, git-gate for git
push, supervise for MCP), bound to `127.0.0.1` on dynamically
allocated ports. egress runs *inside* the bundle as pipelock's
upstream over localhost and is not exposed externally. The
agent's environment carries the resolved URLs (e.g.
`HTTPS_PROXY=http://proxy.internal:<pipelock-gateway-port>`).
- The agent guest image is produced from the existing `Dockerfile`
(or a thin variant), exported as an OCI archive, and consumed by
`smolvm machine create`. The image build step is part of `prepare`,
analogous to `docker_mod.build_image`.
- The PRD 0022 sandbox-escape suite, run with
`CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines`, passes locally on a
smolmachines-capable host. The suite is updated to skip cleanly
on hosts that can't reach smolmachines (same shape as the
existing `GITEA_ACTIONS == "true"` skip), not to fail.
- README + `CLAUDE.md` updated to document the env-var selection,
the macOS-only scope for v1, and the `smolvm` install
prerequisite.
## Non-goals
- **No Linux KVM support shipped in this PRD.** smolmachines works
on Linux via KVM, but the abstraction win is biggest on macOS
where Docker's shared-VM topology hurts most. Linux can come
later behind the same selector.
- **No removal of the Docker backend.** Both backends ship side by
side. Selection stays env-driven; the manifest does not gain a
`backend` field.
- **No default-backend change.** `docker` remains the default
value of `CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND`; smolmachines is strictly
opt-in until it has been load-bearing on at least one operator's
workflow for a release cycle.
- **No TSI for network policy.** libkrun's TSI mode is rejected
for this backend — it lacks per-port filtering on `127.0.0.0/8`
and would expose every host-loopback service to the guest. The
Smolfile must select libkrun's virtio-net mode and attach to
the per-bottle gvproxy unixgram socket; if that combination is
not supported by the pinned smolmachines version (see open
question 1), the implementation falls back to driving
Virtualization.framework directly via PyObjC and reuses the
same gvproxy attachment.
- **No host bind mounts.** The smolmachines research note flagged
that `-v HOST:GUEST` mounts via virtiofs would defeat the
isolation goal. The manifest already has no concept of host
mounts; this PRD does not introduce one. If a future PRD wants
agent-side access to host files, it must come through a
controlled channel (vsock relay, OCI overlay, supervise sidecar
endpoint).
- **No HTTP API mode.** `smolvm serve` is the long-term-clean
control plane, but v1 drives smolmachines via CLI subprocess
invocations — the lower-overhead first iteration the research
note already endorses.
- **No custom kernel / initrd.** smolmachines uses libkrunfw
only; the agent image is an OCI ref, not a kernel + rootfs pair.
- **No warm-pool or snapshot/restore.** Each bottle gets a fresh
microVM; cold-start cost is paid up front.
- **No supervise/agent-credential rewrites for the new backend.**
Provisioning logic ports as-is; only the *transport* (host-side
port URLs instead of in-network DNS names) changes.
## Scope
### In scope
- New `claude_bottle/backend/smolmachines/` subpackage with the
full set of `BottleBackend` overrides.
- Smolfile generator (TOML), analogous to
`backend/docker/compose.py`'s `bottle_plan_to_compose`.
- A host-side sidecar-bundle lifecycle manager that brings up
one container per bottle (the bundle image defined in PRD 0024),
publishes its one to three host ports, waits for readiness,
and tears it down with the bottle. This backend depends on
PRD 0024's bundle image; it does not own the bundle's
Dockerfile or init.
- Per-bottle CA install path: the bundle's CA cert lands inside
the microVM via `smolvm machine exec` after start
(analogous to the existing `provision_ca` for Docker).
- gvproxy lifecycle: per-bottle `gvproxy` started by the backend
before VM bringup, torn down after VM teardown, configured with
up to three `port_forwards` entries (gateway port → host
bundle port for each of pipelock / git-gate / supervise) and a
DNS section that resolves only `proxy.internal`. Subnet and
gateway IP are derived from the bottle slug so two concurrent
bottles don't collide.
- DNS policy: the bottle's `egress.allowlist` does *not* go into
gvproxy's DNS — the agent resolves only `proxy.internal`, and
pipelock on the host enforces the egress allowlist against
the actual upstream connect target. This keeps the DNS-exfil
attack (PRD 0022 test 4) blocked because gvproxy answers
NXDOMAIN for every name except `proxy.internal`.
- Preflight `smolvm` check: if the user selects this backend and
`smolvm` isn't on `$PATH`, die with an install pointer (brew tap
+ version pin TBD in implementation; see open question 3).
- Manifest validation: refuse any bottle field this backend can't
honor (today there are none, since the Docker backend already
rejects host mounts; this is a forward-compat check).
- Tests:
- Smoke unit-level test: Smolfile renderer produces the
expected TOML for a fixture bottle.
- Integration test: `prepare → launch → exec("echo hi") →
teardown` on a smolmachines-capable host (skips otherwise
via the same env/platform gate the Docker integration tests
use).
- PRD 0022 suite, re-run with the env var flipped, passes.
### Out of scope
- VM image caching across bottles (each prepare rebuilds from the
OCI archive; layer reuse is whatever smolmachines provides).
- Cross-host bottle relocation (the OCI archive is local-only).
- Operator-facing knobs for vCPU / memory / overlay size (use
sensible defaults; expose as manifest fields in a later PRD if
needed).
- Integration with the `supervise` plane's permission-prompt UX
beyond port plumbing — supervise already speaks HTTP and binds
to whatever loopback the backend hands it.
## Proposed Design
### Backend layout
```
claude_bottle/backend/smolmachines/
__init__.py re-exports SmolmachinesBottleBackend
backend.py SmolmachinesBottleBackend façade
bottle.py SmolmachinesBottle (exec_claude / exec / cp_in / close)
bottle_plan.py SmolmachinesBottlePlan + .print()
bottle_cleanup_plan.py SmolmachinesBottleCleanupPlan
prepare.py resolve_plan(spec, stage_dir, ...) -> SmolmachinesBottlePlan
launch.py @contextmanager launch(plan) -> SmolmachinesBottle
cleanup.py prepare_cleanup / cleanup / list_active
smolfile.py bottle_plan_to_smolfile(...) -> dict + render
gvproxy.py per-bottle gvproxy config render + process lifecycle
sidecar_bundle.py host-side lifecycle for the PRD 0024 bundle container
smolvm.py thin subprocess wrapper: machine create/start/exec/stop
vfkit_attach.py VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment + VFKT handshake
util.py slugify, port allocation, OCI archive helpers
provision/ ca.py, prompt.py, skills.py, git.py, supervise.py
```
### Network + egress topology
```
┌── macOS host ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌── per-bottle sidecar bundle (one container per microVM) ─┐ │
│ │ init.py (Python supervisor) │ │
│ │ ├─ pipelock (binds 0.0.0.0:8888 in container) │ │
│ │ ├─ egress (mitmproxy) (binds 127.0.0.1:p_internal) │ │
│ │ ├─ git-gate (binds 0.0.0.0:8889) │ │
│ │ └─ supervise (MCP) (binds 0.0.0.0:8890) │ │
│ │ pipelock's upstream is 127.0.0.1:p_internal (egress); │ │
│ │ egress is not exposed outside the bundle. │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬─────┘ │
│ Host ports published (loopback, dynamic): │ │
│ pipelock 127.0.0.1:<p1> │ │
│ git-gate 127.0.0.1:<p2> (conditional) │ │
│ supervise 127.0.0.1:<p3> (conditional) │ │
│ ▲ host TCP, reached via gvproxy port-forward │
│ │ │
│ ┌── gvproxy (per bottle) ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ subnet: 192.168.127.X/24 (X derived from slug) │ │
│ │ gateway: 192.168.127.X.1 │ │
│ │ port_forwards: │ │
│ │ - gateway 8888 → host 127.0.0.1:<p1> │ │
│ │ - gateway 8889 → host 127.0.0.1:<p2> (cond) │ │
│ │ - gateway 8890 → host 127.0.0.1:<p3> (cond) │ │
│ │ # nothing else │ │
│ │ DNS: proxy.internal → gateway IP; * → NXDOMAIN │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ▲ unixgram socket (VFKT handshake) │
│ │ │
│ ┌── microVM (per bottle) ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ virtio-net device backed by VZFileHandle... │ │
│ │ env: HTTPS_PROXY=http://proxy.internal:8888 │ │
│ │ GIT_GATE_URL=http://proxy.internal:8889 │ │
│ │ MCP_SUPERVISE_URL=http://proxy.internal:8890 │ │
│ │ no other host visible │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
What the guest can reach, exhaustively: **only `proxy.internal`
on the gateway-port set we configured.** Everything else —
host LAN, host loopback (Postgres, IDE plugins, other bottles'
sidecars), public internet directly — is gone, enforced at the
gvproxy userspace stack rather than relying on guest cooperation.
Three changes vs. the Docker backend:
1. **One sidecar container per bottle, not four.** The bundle
defined in PRD 0024 is the unit of sidecar lifecycle on both
backends. egress is internal to the bundle as pipelock's
upstream, never directly addressed.
2. **Sidecar container is on the host, not a sibling on a Docker
internal network.** Isolation primitive is gvproxy's explicit
port-forward list, not Docker's `--internal` flag.
3. **The agent's first hop is `proxy.internal`, not a sidecar's
container hostname.** Same scanning + DLP + auth-injection
chain, but the first hop crosses a userspace TCP/IP stack we
own, not a Docker-managed bridge.
git-gate and supervise are conditional port forwards: only
emitted into gvproxy's config when the bottle actually uses
them, narrowing the attack surface for bottles that don't.
### Lifecycle
`SmolmachinesBottleBackend.prepare(spec, stage_dir)`:
1. Cross-backend validation via `BottleBackend._validate` (skills,
git identity files).
2. Allocate one to three host loopback ports for the sidecar
bundle (pipelock always; git-gate and supervise conditional on
manifest — egress is internal to the bundle and gets no host
port).
3. Resolve the agent OCI archive path (build if missing, cache by
Dockerfile + agent-name hash). The sidecar-bundle image
(`claude-bottle-sidecars:<pinned>`) is pulled or built per
PRD 0024; this backend does not own its build.
4. Pick a per-bottle gvproxy subnet (e.g. `192.168.127.X/24` where
`X` is derived from the slug) and render
`stage_dir/gvproxy.yaml`: one DNS entry for `proxy.internal`
and one `port_forwards` entry per active sidecar port
(gateway port → host loopback port on the bundle).
5. Render the per-bottle Smolfile to `stage_dir/smolfile.toml`,
pinning command / env / a virtio-net device backed by the
gvproxy unixgram socket path. No TSI flags.
6. Resolve the in-VM CA paths so launch knows where to copy
pipelock's CA after start.
7. Return a `SmolmachinesBottlePlan` carrying the slug, port map,
OCI archive path, Smolfile path, gvproxy config path, and
the bundle's container/run spec.
`SmolmachinesBottleBackend.launch(plan)`:
1. Start the sidecar bundle container with `docker run` (still
using the local Docker daemon for sidecars; the VM is what's
moving off Docker). Wait for its three readiness signals:
pipelock listening, git-gate listening (if enabled), supervise
listening (if enabled). Register the teardown callback.
2. Start the per-bottle `gvproxy` against the unixgram socket
path the Smolfile references, with `port_forwards` pointed at
the bundle's published host ports. Wait for the socket to
appear (the spike-style poll loop from `agent-vm-isolation.md`).
3. `smolvm machine create --smolfile <path>` and
`smolvm machine start <name>`. The Smolfile's virtio-net
device handshakes (`VFKT` magic) with gvproxy on start.
4. Provisioning: CA install → prompt → skills → git → supervise
config, each via `smolvm machine exec` (analogous to
`docker exec`).
5. Yield a `SmolmachinesBottle` whose `exec_claude` / `exec` /
`cp_in` all funnel through `smolvm machine exec` /
`smolvm machine cp`.
6. Teardown: stop and remove the VM → stop gvproxy → stop +
remove the sidecar bundle container.
### Data model
No manifest schema change. `bottles[]` continues to carry
`egress.allowlist`, `env`, `git`, `skills` references, etc.; the
smolmachines backend reads the same fields as the docker backend.
`egress.allowlist` is enforced by pipelock on the host side
(unchanged from the docker backend); gvproxy's DNS resolves only
`proxy.internal` regardless of the allowlist's contents, so an
agent that bypasses pipelock by raw IP cannot resolve any name
gvproxy doesn't know about.
The `BottleSpec` dataclass and the `Bottle` ABC do not change.
### Selection wiring
In `claude_bottle/backend/__init__.py`:
```python
from .docker import DockerBottleBackend
from .smolmachines import SmolmachinesBottleBackend
_BACKENDS: dict[str, BottleBackend[Any, Any]] = {
"docker": DockerBottleBackend(),
"smolmachines": SmolmachinesBottleBackend(),
}
```
The existing "unknown backend" `die()` path stays as-is.
### External dependencies
- `smolvm` CLI binary on `$PATH` (one new external dep, gated by
the preflight check). Pinned version policy is deferred to the
open questions; v1 reads `smolvm --version` and refuses to launch
outside a known-good range.
- `gvproxy` binary on `$PATH`
(`go install github.com/containers/gvisor-tap-vsock/cmd/gvproxy@latest`,
or vendored). Same preflight pattern as `smolvm`.
- `pyobjc-framework-Virtualization` *only* if smolmachines does
not expose a way to attach virtio-net to a unixgram socket and
we fall back to driving Virtualization.framework directly (see
open question 1). Default path is "no PyObjC needed."
- No new pure-Python packages. Subprocess + stdlib `tomllib` for
Smolfile authoring; the gvproxy YAML is small enough to render
by hand from a `dict[str, Any]`.
### Acceptance test plan
- **Unit (smolfile):** `tests/unit/test_smolfile.py` verifies the
renderer produces the expected TOML for a fixture bottle —
command line, env entries, virtio-net device referencing the
expected unixgram socket path, no TSI flags.
- **Unit (gvproxy config):** `tests/unit/test_gvproxy_config.py`
verifies the per-bottle YAML has exactly one DNS entry
(`proxy.internal`), one `port_forwards` entry per active
sidecar pointed at the resolved host loopback port, and a
per-bottle subnet/gateway derived from the slug.
- **Integration smoke:** `tests/integration/test_smolmachines_smoke.py`
with `prepare → launch → exec → teardown`, guarded by a
`smolvm` + `gvproxy` presence check + macOS / KVM platform check.
- **Localhost-reach probe:** a focused integration test that
brings up a bottle, has the host bind a test service on
`127.0.0.1:<unused-port>`, and asserts the in-bottle agent
cannot connect to it. This is the regression test for the
exact gap that motivated choosing gvproxy over TSI.
- **PRD 0022 re-run:** with `CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines`,
all five attack categories return sandbox-block markers and the
suite passes. The test code does not change beyond the env-var
flip — that's the contract the PRD 0022 abstraction was
designed for.
## Sizing — into chunks
PRD 0024's bundle image is a prerequisite — this PRD assumes
`claude-bottle-sidecars:<pinned>` is available when chunk 3 lands.
1. **Backend skeleton + selection + Smolfile + gvproxy renderers.**
Subpackage layout, `_resolve_plan` stub that emits both a
TOML Smolfile and a gvproxy YAML but doesn't launch anything,
`_BACKENDS` registration, preflight `smolvm` + `gvproxy`
checks. Unit tests on both renderers. No VM bringup yet.
2. **gvproxy + VM lifecycle + OCI archive build.** `smolvm.py`
and `gvproxy.py` subprocess wrappers, prepare-time image
build (existing Dockerfile → OCI archive), launch path that
starts gvproxy, brings up the VM attached to gvproxy's socket
via VFKT handshake, exec into the VM, tear everything down.
Smoke integration test: `exec("echo hi")` inside a started
VM. Includes the localhost-reach probe test from the
acceptance plan.
3. **Sidecar bundle lifecycle.** `sidecar_bundle.py`: per-bottle
bundle container brought up via `docker run`, with one to
three published host ports, gvproxy `port_forwards` pointed
at them, and teardown integrated into the bottle's lifecycle.
Port allocator. No provisioning yet beyond what the bundle
needs.
4. **Provisioning parity with Docker.** CA install via
`smolvm machine exec`, prompt/skills/.git copy-in, supervise
MCP config. End-to-end `start` works for a real agent manifest.
5. **PRD 0022 sandbox-escape suite green.** Skip-guard update,
small adjustments to test helpers if any (the test uses
`bottle.exec(script)` and inspects `returncode` + body for
sandbox markers — should be transport-agnostic, but verify).
Document the macOS-only scope in README.
## Open questions
1. **VMM choice: smolmachines vs PyObjC + Virtualization.framework.**
The network design requires libkrun's virtio-net mode attached
to a unixgram socket (so gvproxy is the gateway). The
smolmachines research note says libkrun *has* a virtio-net
mode but says it "does not support policy" — meaning libkrun
itself enforces no allowlist in that mode, which is exactly
what we want (gvproxy is the policy). What's unverified is
whether the Smolfile surface lets us point virtio-net at a
custom unixgram socket. If yes: this is a smolmachines backend
verbatim. If no: chunk 2 drops `smolvm` and drives
`Virtualization.framework` via PyObjC directly (the recipe in
`agent-vm-isolation.md` § "gvisor-tap-vsock + PyObjC +
Pipelock"), keeping the backend name "smolmachines" because
the operator-facing UX is unchanged. Resolve in chunk 1 via a
spike against the pinned smolmachines version.
2. **`smolvm` + `gvproxy` install policy.** Pin via brew /
`go install` versions, or vendor binaries in the repo. v1
likely runs `smolvm --version` / `gvproxy --help` at preflight
and accepts a documented range; vendoring is heavier but
reduces "works on my Mac" drift.
3. **CA install inside the OCI overlay.** Two paths: bake at
prepare time (one OCI archive per CA fingerprint, big cache
key) vs. inject at start time via `smolvm machine exec` after
the VM is up. PRD 0006 chose the runtime path for Docker
(docker-cp + `update-ca-certificates`); smolvm has the same
shape via `machine exec`. Default to runtime injection unless
it conflicts with VM start order.
4. **gvproxy subnet collision.** Two concurrent bottles must not
land on the same `192.168.127.X/24` subnet — they'd both want
the same gateway IP. Derive the third octet from a hash of
the slug (mod 254, skip the docker-default 17), and at launch
time confirm the subnet isn't already in use by another
bottle's gvproxy. Resolve the hash-collision policy in
chunk 2.
5. **`bottle.exec(script)` exit-code fidelity.** The PRD 0022 test
suite reads `returncode` + stdout + stderr from
`ExecResult`. Confirm the VM-exec path (`smolvm machine exec`
or its PyObjC equivalent) propagates exit codes and separated
streams. The research note's "external integration is the CLI"
implies yes, but the embedded SDK bug it flagged suggests we
should verify before coding around it.
6. **CI gating.** Gitea's act_runner is Linux without nested KVM,
so this backend's integration tests will skip there for the
same structural reason the Docker bringup tests do (no real
isolation primitive available on the runner). The skip
predicate becomes `not (smolvm_available() and gvproxy_available()
and platform.system() == "Darwin")`. CI coverage for this
backend will come from local runs on the maintainer's macOS
host until a Darwin runner is wired up; ack that as a known
gap.
7. **Active bottle discovery.** Docker uses container labels to
enumerate active bottles (`list_active` queries the daemon).
The microVM enumeration story is `smolvm machine list`
(or the PyObjC backend's own bookkeeping); the plan is to
mirror the label scheme via Smolfile metadata
(`labels = { "claude-bottle" = "1" }`-style entries, if the
format supports it; otherwise via a deterministic name prefix
`claude-bottle-<slug>` + on-disk metadata under
`state/<slug>/`).
## References
- `docs/research/agent-vm-isolation.md` — primary reference for
the gvproxy + `VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment` network
attachment used here. The "Full Setup: gvisor-tap-vsock +
PyObjC + Pipelock" section is the recipe the PyObjC fallback
in open question 1 would adopt verbatim.
- `docs/research/smolmachines-as-vm-backend.md` — evaluation of
smolmachines as the VM lifecycle wrapper. This PRD diverges
from its conclusion on the *network* primitive (rejecting TSI
in favor of gvproxy) but keeps its VM-lifecycle conclusion
conditional on the libkrun-virtio-net spike in open question 1.
- `docs/research/agent-sandbox-landscape.md` — identifies
`"runtime": "microvm"`-style opt-in as the borrowable idea;
smolmachines is the concrete implementation.
- PRD 0003 (`docs/prds/0003-bottle-backend-abstraction.md`) — the
backend abstraction this PRD is the first non-Docker consumer
of.
- PRD 0017 (`docs/prds/0017-egress-proxy-via-mitmproxy.md`) — the
egress sidecar the bundle reuses verbatim as pipelock's internal
upstream.
- PRD 0022
(`docs/prds/0022-sandbox-escape-integration-test.md`) — the
acceptance gate for this PRD; the suite already runs through
`get_bottle_backend()` so the env-var flip is the only change
needed to exercise the smolmachines path.
- PRD 0024
(`docs/prds/0024-consolidate-sidecar-bundle.md`) — defines the
single bundle image (`claude-bottle-sidecars`) this PRD
consumes. Prerequisite for chunk 3 of this PRD.