Replace the four host-side sidecar processes (pipelock + egress + git-gate + supervise) with a single bundled container per bottle, defined in PRD 0024 and consumed here. egress is internal to the bundle as pipelock's upstream; only pipelock, git-gate, and supervise are externally addressable, and only when the bottle uses them. gvproxy port_forwards collapse from one-per-process to one-per- external-port, all pointing into the one bundle container. Sizing: chunk 3 becomes "sidecar bundle lifecycle" and depends on PRD 0024 having landed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
31 KiB
PRD 0023: smolmachines bottle backend
- Status: Draft
- Author: didericis
- Created: 2026-05-26
Summary
Ship a second concrete BottleBackend —
SmolmachinesBottleBackend, selected via
CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines — that runs each bottle inside
a per-agent microVM on macOS. The egress topology is enforced by
gvproxy (gvisor-tap-vsock), a userspace TCP/IP stack the guest's
virtio-net device is wired into via VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment.
gvproxy's only outbound configuration is an explicit per-bottle
port-forward set into a single per-bottle sidecar container that
bundles pipelock + egress + git-gate + supervise behind one supervised
init. Everything else — the host's LAN, the host's loopback
services, the public internet — is unreachable from the guest by
construction.
The sidecar bundle is the same image PRD 0024 introduces for the
docker backend; this PRD consumes it. Inside the bundle, egress is
pipelock's internal upstream over localhost and is not exposed
externally. gvproxy port-forwards three external ports into the
bundle: pipelock (for HTTPS_PROXY), git-gate (for git push), and
supervise (for MCP).
This explicitly rejects libkrun's TSI ("Transport Socket Interface")
allowlist as the network primitive. TSI's --outbound-localhost-only
is permissive on the entire 127.0.0.0/8 range with no
destination-port filter — the agent can dial any host-side service
bound to loopback (a local Postgres, an IDE plugin, a different
bottle's pipelock). That's the wrong default for a malicious-agent
threat model; see "Why gvproxy, not TSI" below.
The Docker backend ships unchanged; this is opt-in via the existing
env-var selector. The acceptance gate is PRD 0022's
tests/integration/test_sandbox_escape.py running green against
CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines.
Problem
agent-vm-isolation.md argues for hardware-isolated microVMs over
container-based bottles on macOS; smolmachines-as-vm-backend.md
evaluates smolmachines as the lifecycle wrapper. Today, the only
backend in the registry is Docker
(claude_bottle/backend/__init__.py:_BACKENDS = {"docker": ...}),
and four things motivate a second one now:
- Network reach beyond pipelock. The threat model is a malicious
agent attempting to dial something on the operator's local
network (
192.168.x.xservices, the home router, a coworker's laptop on the same Wi-Fi) or host's loopback (a local database, an editor plugin, another bottle's sidecar) without traversing pipelock. The Docker backend's--internalnetwork blocks the first; nothing in the current stack blocks the second cleanly. This PRD's gvproxy-based design closes both gaps: the guest can only reach the explicit port-forward list, period. - Isolation ceiling. On macOS the Docker backend's agent
container shares Docker Desktop's host VM with every other
bottle. Container escape from claude-code lands the agent inside
that shared VM. A per-bottle microVM gets hardware page tables
via
Hypervisor.framework; cross-bottle isolation becomes enforced by the CPU's MMU instead of namespace bookkeeping. - PRD 0022 is backend-agnostic by design but currently only
exercises the Docker backend. The suite was written with
CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKENDselection in mind precisely so the smolmachines path could be validated against the same five attacks. Until a second backend exists, the abstraction is unproven. - CI carve-outs. Most bottle-bringup integration tests skip
under
GITEA_ACTIONS=truebecause act_runner shares the host Docker socket but not the host filesystem. A microVM path doesn't share that constraint shape (it has its own, but different), so adding the backend forces the abstraction to be clean in places where Docker-specific assumptions have been tolerated.
Why gvproxy, not TSI
libkrun's TSI hijacks guest socket syscalls inside the VMM and
opens the actual sockets from the host process, with a CIDR
allowlist gate. That works fine for blocking LAN reach (don't
allowlist 192.168.0.0/16, agent can't dial it). But TSI's
--outbound-localhost-only permits the entire 127.0.0.0/8
range across all ports — there is no destination-port filter at
the TSI layer (smolmachines-as-vm-backend.md flags this in the
"--allow-host semantics" caveat). For our threat model that
means any host-loopback service is reachable from the guest.
gvproxy implements a full userspace TCP/IP stack on the host side
of a VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment unixgram socket. The
guest has a real virtio-net device; gvproxy is its gateway. The
guest can only reach what gvproxy is configured to forward —
typically a single port forward to the per-bottle pipelock —
and DNS resolves NXDOMAIN by default. There is no "permissive
loopback" mode to mis-configure; if it's not in port_forwards,
the guest cannot reach it.
That property — explicit allowlist by port forward, not CIDR — is the load-bearing reason this PRD chooses gvproxy. TSI shows up once more in this doc, under Non-goals, where it is closed off.
Goals / Success Criteria
The feature works when all of the following are observable on a macOS host with smolmachines installed:
CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines python3 cli.py start <agent>brings up a microVM, runs claude-code inside it, and tears it down on exit. Same y/N preflight UX as Docker — only the resolved-runtime line differs.- The sandbox-escape suite in
tests/integration/test_sandbox_escape.pyruns green against the smolmachines backend (all five attack categories blocked). - Selecting the backend on a host without
smolvminstalled dies at startup with an install pointer; no silent fall-through to Docker. - Active bottles show up under
python3 cli.py list-bottlesregardless of backend. python3 cli.py stop <bottle>and orphan cleanup work for both Docker bottles and smolmachines bottles via the same CLI surface.
The feature is done when all of the following ship:
- A new
claude_bottle/backend/smolmachines/subpackage exists, mirroring the layout ofclaude_bottle/backend/docker/(backend.py,bottle.py,bottle_plan.py,bottle_cleanup_plan.py,prepare.py,launch.py,cleanup.py,util.py, and aprovision/subpackage for the fiveprovision_*methods). SmolmachinesBottleBackendregistered under the"smolmachines"key inclaude_bottle/backend/__init__.py:_BACKENDS.- Per-bottle Smolfile generation: a runtime-rendered TOML written
to the bottle's stage dir, analogous to the compose file the
Docker backend writes today. The Smolfile pins
command,env, and a virtio-net device backed by a unixgram socket pointed at the per-bottle gvproxy. There is no TSI--allow-cidr/--outbound-localhost-only/--allow-hostin the Smolfile — TSI is not used. - Per-bottle gvproxy: one
gvproxyprocess per bottle, started before the VM, listening on a unixgram socket the VM's virtio-net device hooks into. The gvproxy config has up to threeport_forwardsentries (pipelock / git-gate / supervise — git-gate and supervise only when the bottle uses them) all pointing at the per-bottle sidecar bundle's exposed ports, plus a DNS section that resolves onlyproxy.internal. Every other hostname returns NXDOMAIN; every other destination is unreachable. - Per-bottle sidecar bundle: one container per bottle running the
bundle image defined in PRD 0024. The bundle exposes up to
three host ports (pipelock for
HTTPS_PROXY, git-gate for git push, supervise for MCP), bound to127.0.0.1on dynamically allocated ports. egress runs inside the bundle as pipelock's upstream over localhost and is not exposed externally. The agent's environment carries the resolved URLs (e.g.HTTPS_PROXY=http://proxy.internal:<pipelock-gateway-port>). - The agent guest image is produced from the existing
Dockerfile(or a thin variant), exported as an OCI archive, and consumed bysmolvm machine create. The image build step is part ofprepare, analogous todocker_mod.build_image. - The PRD 0022 sandbox-escape suite, run with
CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines, passes locally on a smolmachines-capable host. The suite is updated to skip cleanly on hosts that can't reach smolmachines (same shape as the existingGITEA_ACTIONS == "true"skip), not to fail. - README +
CLAUDE.mdupdated to document the env-var selection, the macOS-only scope for v1, and thesmolvminstall prerequisite.
Non-goals
- No Linux KVM support shipped in this PRD. smolmachines works on Linux via KVM, but the abstraction win is biggest on macOS where Docker's shared-VM topology hurts most. Linux can come later behind the same selector.
- No removal of the Docker backend. Both backends ship side by
side. Selection stays env-driven; the manifest does not gain a
backendfield. - No default-backend change.
dockerremains the default value ofCLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND; smolmachines is strictly opt-in until it has been load-bearing on at least one operator's workflow for a release cycle. - No TSI for network policy. libkrun's TSI mode is rejected
for this backend — it lacks per-port filtering on
127.0.0.0/8and would expose every host-loopback service to the guest. The Smolfile must select libkrun's virtio-net mode and attach to the per-bottle gvproxy unixgram socket; if that combination is not supported by the pinned smolmachines version (see open question 1), the implementation falls back to driving Virtualization.framework directly via PyObjC and reuses the same gvproxy attachment. - No host bind mounts. The smolmachines research note flagged
that
-v HOST:GUESTmounts via virtiofs would defeat the isolation goal. The manifest already has no concept of host mounts; this PRD does not introduce one. If a future PRD wants agent-side access to host files, it must come through a controlled channel (vsock relay, OCI overlay, supervise sidecar endpoint). - No HTTP API mode.
smolvm serveis the long-term-clean control plane, but v1 drives smolmachines via CLI subprocess invocations — the lower-overhead first iteration the research note already endorses. - No custom kernel / initrd. smolmachines uses libkrunfw only; the agent image is an OCI ref, not a kernel + rootfs pair.
- No warm-pool or snapshot/restore. Each bottle gets a fresh microVM; cold-start cost is paid up front.
- No supervise/agent-credential rewrites for the new backend. Provisioning logic ports as-is; only the transport (host-side port URLs instead of in-network DNS names) changes.
Scope
In scope
- New
claude_bottle/backend/smolmachines/subpackage with the full set ofBottleBackendoverrides. - Smolfile generator (TOML), analogous to
backend/docker/compose.py'sbottle_plan_to_compose. - A host-side sidecar-bundle lifecycle manager that brings up one container per bottle (the bundle image defined in PRD 0024), publishes its one to three host ports, waits for readiness, and tears it down with the bottle. This backend depends on PRD 0024's bundle image; it does not own the bundle's Dockerfile or init.
- Per-bottle CA install path: the bundle's CA cert lands inside
the microVM via
smolvm machine execafter start (analogous to the existingprovision_cafor Docker). - gvproxy lifecycle: per-bottle
gvproxystarted by the backend before VM bringup, torn down after VM teardown, configured with up to threeport_forwardsentries (gateway port → host bundle port for each of pipelock / git-gate / supervise) and a DNS section that resolves onlyproxy.internal. Subnet and gateway IP are derived from the bottle slug so two concurrent bottles don't collide. - DNS policy: the bottle's
egress.allowlistdoes not go into gvproxy's DNS — the agent resolves onlyproxy.internal, and pipelock on the host enforces the egress allowlist against the actual upstream connect target. This keeps the DNS-exfil attack (PRD 0022 test 4) blocked because gvproxy answers NXDOMAIN for every name exceptproxy.internal. - Preflight
smolvmcheck: if the user selects this backend andsmolvmisn't on$PATH, die with an install pointer (brew tap- version pin TBD in implementation; see open question 3).
- Manifest validation: refuse any bottle field this backend can't honor (today there are none, since the Docker backend already rejects host mounts; this is a forward-compat check).
- Tests:
- Smoke unit-level test: Smolfile renderer produces the expected TOML for a fixture bottle.
- Integration test:
prepare → launch → exec("echo hi") → teardownon a smolmachines-capable host (skips otherwise via the same env/platform gate the Docker integration tests use). - PRD 0022 suite, re-run with the env var flipped, passes.
Out of scope
- VM image caching across bottles (each prepare rebuilds from the OCI archive; layer reuse is whatever smolmachines provides).
- Cross-host bottle relocation (the OCI archive is local-only).
- Operator-facing knobs for vCPU / memory / overlay size (use sensible defaults; expose as manifest fields in a later PRD if needed).
- Integration with the
superviseplane's permission-prompt UX beyond port plumbing — supervise already speaks HTTP and binds to whatever loopback the backend hands it.
Proposed Design
Backend layout
claude_bottle/backend/smolmachines/
__init__.py re-exports SmolmachinesBottleBackend
backend.py SmolmachinesBottleBackend façade
bottle.py SmolmachinesBottle (exec_claude / exec / cp_in / close)
bottle_plan.py SmolmachinesBottlePlan + .print()
bottle_cleanup_plan.py SmolmachinesBottleCleanupPlan
prepare.py resolve_plan(spec, stage_dir, ...) -> SmolmachinesBottlePlan
launch.py @contextmanager launch(plan) -> SmolmachinesBottle
cleanup.py prepare_cleanup / cleanup / list_active
smolfile.py bottle_plan_to_smolfile(...) -> dict + render
gvproxy.py per-bottle gvproxy config render + process lifecycle
sidecar_bundle.py host-side lifecycle for the PRD 0024 bundle container
smolvm.py thin subprocess wrapper: machine create/start/exec/stop
vfkit_attach.py VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment + VFKT handshake
util.py slugify, port allocation, OCI archive helpers
provision/ ca.py, prompt.py, skills.py, git.py, supervise.py
Network + egress topology
┌── macOS host ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌── per-bottle sidecar bundle (one container per microVM) ─┐ │
│ │ init.py (Python supervisor) │ │
│ │ ├─ pipelock (binds 0.0.0.0:8888 in container) │ │
│ │ ├─ egress (mitmproxy) (binds 127.0.0.1:p_internal) │ │
│ │ ├─ git-gate (binds 0.0.0.0:8889) │ │
│ │ └─ supervise (MCP) (binds 0.0.0.0:8890) │ │
│ │ pipelock's upstream is 127.0.0.1:p_internal (egress); │ │
│ │ egress is not exposed outside the bundle. │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬─────┘ │
│ Host ports published (loopback, dynamic): │ │
│ pipelock 127.0.0.1:<p1> │ │
│ git-gate 127.0.0.1:<p2> (conditional) │ │
│ supervise 127.0.0.1:<p3> (conditional) │ │
│ ▲ host TCP, reached via gvproxy port-forward │
│ │ │
│ ┌── gvproxy (per bottle) ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ subnet: 192.168.127.X/24 (X derived from slug) │ │
│ │ gateway: 192.168.127.X.1 │ │
│ │ port_forwards: │ │
│ │ - gateway 8888 → host 127.0.0.1:<p1> │ │
│ │ - gateway 8889 → host 127.0.0.1:<p2> (cond) │ │
│ │ - gateway 8890 → host 127.0.0.1:<p3> (cond) │ │
│ │ # nothing else │ │
│ │ DNS: proxy.internal → gateway IP; * → NXDOMAIN │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ▲ unixgram socket (VFKT handshake) │
│ │ │
│ ┌── microVM (per bottle) ─────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ virtio-net device backed by VZFileHandle... │ │
│ │ env: HTTPS_PROXY=http://proxy.internal:8888 │ │
│ │ GIT_GATE_URL=http://proxy.internal:8889 │ │
│ │ MCP_SUPERVISE_URL=http://proxy.internal:8890 │ │
│ │ no other host visible │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What the guest can reach, exhaustively: only proxy.internal
on the gateway-port set we configured. Everything else —
host LAN, host loopback (Postgres, IDE plugins, other bottles'
sidecars), public internet directly — is gone, enforced at the
gvproxy userspace stack rather than relying on guest cooperation.
Three changes vs. the Docker backend:
- One sidecar container per bottle, not four. The bundle defined in PRD 0024 is the unit of sidecar lifecycle on both backends. egress is internal to the bundle as pipelock's upstream, never directly addressed.
- Sidecar container is on the host, not a sibling on a Docker
internal network. Isolation primitive is gvproxy's explicit
port-forward list, not Docker's
--internalflag. - The agent's first hop is
proxy.internal, not a sidecar's container hostname. Same scanning + DLP + auth-injection chain, but the first hop crosses a userspace TCP/IP stack we own, not a Docker-managed bridge.
git-gate and supervise are conditional port forwards: only emitted into gvproxy's config when the bottle actually uses them, narrowing the attack surface for bottles that don't.
Lifecycle
SmolmachinesBottleBackend.prepare(spec, stage_dir):
- Cross-backend validation via
BottleBackend._validate(skills, git identity files). - Allocate one to three host loopback ports for the sidecar bundle (pipelock always; git-gate and supervise conditional on manifest — egress is internal to the bundle and gets no host port).
- Resolve the agent OCI archive path (build if missing, cache by
Dockerfile + agent-name hash). The sidecar-bundle image
(
claude-bottle-sidecars:<pinned>) is pulled or built per PRD 0024; this backend does not own its build. - Pick a per-bottle gvproxy subnet (e.g.
192.168.127.X/24whereXis derived from the slug) and renderstage_dir/gvproxy.yaml: one DNS entry forproxy.internaland oneport_forwardsentry per active sidecar port (gateway port → host loopback port on the bundle). - Render the per-bottle Smolfile to
stage_dir/smolfile.toml, pinning command / env / a virtio-net device backed by the gvproxy unixgram socket path. No TSI flags. - Resolve the in-VM CA paths so launch knows where to copy pipelock's CA after start.
- Return a
SmolmachinesBottlePlancarrying the slug, port map, OCI archive path, Smolfile path, gvproxy config path, and the bundle's container/run spec.
SmolmachinesBottleBackend.launch(plan):
- Start the sidecar bundle container with
docker run(still using the local Docker daemon for sidecars; the VM is what's moving off Docker). Wait for its three readiness signals: pipelock listening, git-gate listening (if enabled), supervise listening (if enabled). Register the teardown callback. - Start the per-bottle
gvproxyagainst the unixgram socket path the Smolfile references, withport_forwardspointed at the bundle's published host ports. Wait for the socket to appear (the spike-style poll loop fromagent-vm-isolation.md). smolvm machine create --smolfile <path>andsmolvm machine start <name>. The Smolfile's virtio-net device handshakes (VFKTmagic) with gvproxy on start.- Provisioning: CA install → prompt → skills → git → supervise
config, each via
smolvm machine exec(analogous todocker exec). - Yield a
SmolmachinesBottlewhoseexec_claude/exec/cp_inall funnel throughsmolvm machine exec/smolvm machine cp. - Teardown: stop and remove the VM → stop gvproxy → stop + remove the sidecar bundle container.
Data model
No manifest schema change. bottles[] continues to carry
egress.allowlist, env, git, skills references, etc.; the
smolmachines backend reads the same fields as the docker backend.
egress.allowlist is enforced by pipelock on the host side
(unchanged from the docker backend); gvproxy's DNS resolves only
proxy.internal regardless of the allowlist's contents, so an
agent that bypasses pipelock by raw IP cannot resolve any name
gvproxy doesn't know about.
The BottleSpec dataclass and the Bottle ABC do not change.
Selection wiring
In claude_bottle/backend/__init__.py:
from .docker import DockerBottleBackend
from .smolmachines import SmolmachinesBottleBackend
_BACKENDS: dict[str, BottleBackend[Any, Any]] = {
"docker": DockerBottleBackend(),
"smolmachines": SmolmachinesBottleBackend(),
}
The existing "unknown backend" die() path stays as-is.
External dependencies
smolvmCLI binary on$PATH(one new external dep, gated by the preflight check). Pinned version policy is deferred to the open questions; v1 readssmolvm --versionand refuses to launch outside a known-good range.gvproxybinary on$PATH(go install github.com/containers/gvisor-tap-vsock/cmd/gvproxy@latest, or vendored). Same preflight pattern assmolvm.pyobjc-framework-Virtualizationonly if smolmachines does not expose a way to attach virtio-net to a unixgram socket and we fall back to driving Virtualization.framework directly (see open question 1). Default path is "no PyObjC needed."- No new pure-Python packages. Subprocess + stdlib
tomllibfor Smolfile authoring; the gvproxy YAML is small enough to render by hand from adict[str, Any].
Acceptance test plan
- Unit (smolfile):
tests/unit/test_smolfile.pyverifies the renderer produces the expected TOML for a fixture bottle — command line, env entries, virtio-net device referencing the expected unixgram socket path, no TSI flags. - Unit (gvproxy config):
tests/unit/test_gvproxy_config.pyverifies the per-bottle YAML has exactly one DNS entry (proxy.internal), oneport_forwardsentry per active sidecar pointed at the resolved host loopback port, and a per-bottle subnet/gateway derived from the slug. - Integration smoke:
tests/integration/test_smolmachines_smoke.pywithprepare → launch → exec → teardown, guarded by asmolvm+gvproxypresence check + macOS / KVM platform check. - Localhost-reach probe: a focused integration test that
brings up a bottle, has the host bind a test service on
127.0.0.1:<unused-port>, and asserts the in-bottle agent cannot connect to it. This is the regression test for the exact gap that motivated choosing gvproxy over TSI. - PRD 0022 re-run: with
CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND=smolmachines, all five attack categories return sandbox-block markers and the suite passes. The test code does not change beyond the env-var flip — that's the contract the PRD 0022 abstraction was designed for.
Sizing — into chunks
PRD 0024's bundle image is a prerequisite — this PRD assumes
claude-bottle-sidecars:<pinned> is available when chunk 3 lands.
- Backend skeleton + selection + Smolfile + gvproxy renderers.
Subpackage layout,
_resolve_planstub that emits both a TOML Smolfile and a gvproxy YAML but doesn't launch anything,_BACKENDSregistration, preflightsmolvm+gvproxychecks. Unit tests on both renderers. No VM bringup yet. - gvproxy + VM lifecycle + OCI archive build.
smolvm.pyandgvproxy.pysubprocess wrappers, prepare-time image build (existing Dockerfile → OCI archive), launch path that starts gvproxy, brings up the VM attached to gvproxy's socket via VFKT handshake, exec into the VM, tear everything down. Smoke integration test:exec("echo hi")inside a started VM. Includes the localhost-reach probe test from the acceptance plan. - Sidecar bundle lifecycle.
sidecar_bundle.py: per-bottle bundle container brought up viadocker run, with one to three published host ports, gvproxyport_forwardspointed at them, and teardown integrated into the bottle's lifecycle. Port allocator. No provisioning yet beyond what the bundle needs. - Provisioning parity with Docker. CA install via
smolvm machine exec, prompt/skills/.git copy-in, supervise MCP config. End-to-endstartworks for a real agent manifest. - PRD 0022 sandbox-escape suite green. Skip-guard update,
small adjustments to test helpers if any (the test uses
bottle.exec(script)and inspectsreturncode+ body for sandbox markers — should be transport-agnostic, but verify). Document the macOS-only scope in README.
Open questions
- VMM choice: smolmachines vs PyObjC + Virtualization.framework.
The network design requires libkrun's virtio-net mode attached
to a unixgram socket (so gvproxy is the gateway). The
smolmachines research note says libkrun has a virtio-net
mode but says it "does not support policy" — meaning libkrun
itself enforces no allowlist in that mode, which is exactly
what we want (gvproxy is the policy). What's unverified is
whether the Smolfile surface lets us point virtio-net at a
custom unixgram socket. If yes: this is a smolmachines backend
verbatim. If no: chunk 2 drops
smolvmand drivesVirtualization.frameworkvia PyObjC directly (the recipe inagent-vm-isolation.md§ "gvisor-tap-vsock + PyObjC + Pipelock"), keeping the backend name "smolmachines" because the operator-facing UX is unchanged. Resolve in chunk 1 via a spike against the pinned smolmachines version. smolvm+gvproxyinstall policy. Pin via brew /go installversions, or vendor binaries in the repo. v1 likely runssmolvm --version/gvproxy --helpat preflight and accepts a documented range; vendoring is heavier but reduces "works on my Mac" drift.- CA install inside the OCI overlay. Two paths: bake at
prepare time (one OCI archive per CA fingerprint, big cache
key) vs. inject at start time via
smolvm machine execafter the VM is up. PRD 0006 chose the runtime path for Docker (docker-cp +update-ca-certificates); smolvm has the same shape viamachine exec. Default to runtime injection unless it conflicts with VM start order. - gvproxy subnet collision. Two concurrent bottles must not
land on the same
192.168.127.X/24subnet — they'd both want the same gateway IP. Derive the third octet from a hash of the slug (mod 254, skip the docker-default 17), and at launch time confirm the subnet isn't already in use by another bottle's gvproxy. Resolve the hash-collision policy in chunk 2. bottle.exec(script)exit-code fidelity. The PRD 0022 test suite readsreturncode+ stdout + stderr fromExecResult. Confirm the VM-exec path (smolvm machine execor its PyObjC equivalent) propagates exit codes and separated streams. The research note's "external integration is the CLI" implies yes, but the embedded SDK bug it flagged suggests we should verify before coding around it.- CI gating. Gitea's act_runner is Linux without nested KVM,
so this backend's integration tests will skip there for the
same structural reason the Docker bringup tests do (no real
isolation primitive available on the runner). The skip
predicate becomes
not (smolvm_available() and gvproxy_available() and platform.system() == "Darwin"). CI coverage for this backend will come from local runs on the maintainer's macOS host until a Darwin runner is wired up; ack that as a known gap. - Active bottle discovery. Docker uses container labels to
enumerate active bottles (
list_activequeries the daemon). The microVM enumeration story issmolvm machine list(or the PyObjC backend's own bookkeeping); the plan is to mirror the label scheme via Smolfile metadata (labels = { "claude-bottle" = "1" }-style entries, if the format supports it; otherwise via a deterministic name prefixclaude-bottle-<slug>+ on-disk metadata understate/<slug>/).
References
docs/research/agent-vm-isolation.md— primary reference for the gvproxy +VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachmentnetwork attachment used here. The "Full Setup: gvisor-tap-vsock + PyObjC + Pipelock" section is the recipe the PyObjC fallback in open question 1 would adopt verbatim.docs/research/smolmachines-as-vm-backend.md— evaluation of smolmachines as the VM lifecycle wrapper. This PRD diverges from its conclusion on the network primitive (rejecting TSI in favor of gvproxy) but keeps its VM-lifecycle conclusion conditional on the libkrun-virtio-net spike in open question 1.docs/research/agent-sandbox-landscape.md— identifies"runtime": "microvm"-style opt-in as the borrowable idea; smolmachines is the concrete implementation.- PRD 0003 (
docs/prds/0003-bottle-backend-abstraction.md) — the backend abstraction this PRD is the first non-Docker consumer of. - PRD 0017 (
docs/prds/0017-egress-proxy-via-mitmproxy.md) — the egress sidecar the bundle reuses verbatim as pipelock's internal upstream. - PRD 0022
(
docs/prds/0022-sandbox-escape-integration-test.md) — the acceptance gate for this PRD; the suite already runs throughget_bottle_backend()so the env-var flip is the only change needed to exercise the smolmachines path. - PRD 0024
(
docs/prds/0024-consolidate-sidecar-bundle.md) — defines the single bundle image (claude-bottle-sidecars) this PRD consumes. Prerequisite for chunk 3 of this PRD.