didericis 873c2ccdbd face_monochromatic_pairs: retract n_i = 6 lemma as empirically false
CRITICAL AUDIT FINDING: experiments/check_subcase_iib.py shows that
Lemma (Flank covering, n_i = 6) is empirically FALSE in full
generality, not just unproven:

  Across 142,812 chord-apex+Kempe colourings up to |V(G)| ≤ 20:
    -   9,228 (6.46%) reach sub-case (ii.B) of Case (b)
        (φ(A_i P_1) = c_1 AND φ(P_1 P_2) = c_0);
    -   1,314 (0.92%) of those have P_1 ∉ V(K_b) ∪ V(K_c),
        falsifying the lemma's conclusion ∂F_flank^♭ ⊆ V(K_b) ∪ V(K_c).

So the original n_i = 6 lemma cannot be saved by patching the proof;
the conclusion itself is wrong.

Paper changes:
  - Lemma (Flank covering, n_i = 6): retracted in full generality.
    Restated with a weakened conclusion (true only for Case (a) and
    Case (b) sub-case (i)), with explicit acknowledgement that the
    sub-case (b)(ii) configuration falsifies the lemma on 1,314
    colourings.
  - Proof of the lemma: rewritten to honestly stop at the proven sub-
    cases; sub-case (b)(ii) is identified as unprovable by local
    argument (and now demonstrated empirically false).
  - Theorem (Partial proof via flank): restricted from n_i ∈ {5, 6}
    to n_i = 5 only.
  - Theorem (Extended partial proof): cases relabelled (a'), (b'), (c)
    with a' = (n_i = 5), b' = (n_{i+1} = 5), c = (n_{i+2} = n_{i+4} = 5).
  - Empirical coverage remark: structural proof covers
    7,531 / 7,930 (94.97%) of (G, v, i) configurations up to
    |V(G)| ≤ 20. The other 399 (5.03%) have at least one n_k = 6 but
    no n_k = 5 in the right position; the flank face on the n_k = 6
    side is the natural candidate but is no longer a tight covering.
  - Deciding-face conjecture itself remains empirically true on all
    142,812 colourings; the proof's structural step is what's open
    on the 399 triples.

Lessons from the audit:
  - The "+P_2 ∈ V(K_b) ∪ V(K_c) implies P_1 ∈ V(K_b) ∪ V(K_c)"
    propagation in the original n_i = 6 proof was wrong: the cycle
    type (K_b vs K_c) matters in a way the proof glossed over, and
    specifically when φ(P_1 P_2) = c_0 the K_c cycle through P_2
    doesn't use that edge.
  - A correct n_i = 6 lemma would require a global K_b-walk argument
    showing the {c, c_0}-cycle through P_2 coincides with K_b in the
    bad sub-case. Empirically this is FALSE in 0.92% of colourings,
    so no such argument exists; the n_i = 6 covering must instead come
    from a different face entirely for those colourings.

Paper stays at 21 pages.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 05:10:48 -04:00
2026-04-12 22:23:55 -04:00
2026-04-20 16:32:27 -04:00
2026-04-20 16:32:27 -04:00
2026-04-20 17:00:04 -04:00
2026-04-20 16:32:27 -04:00
2026-04-17 00:54:42 -04:00
2026-05-09 11:34:58 -04:00

math-research

Personal mathematics research repository by Eric Bauerfeld. Papers are written in AMS-LaTeX using the amsart document class.

Papers

kempe_style_search_for_smaller_contradiction

Humans Suffice: A Novel Proof of the Four Color Theorem

An in-progress proof of the Four Color Theorem via a minimal counterexample argument. The paper builds on Kempe's 1879 strategy — establishing valid cases for vertices of degree ≤ 4, then extending the argument to the degree-5 case using properties of non-adjacent degree-5 vertices, merged subgraphs, and locked colorings.

plane_depth_labelling

Plane Depth Labelling

Early-stage paper. Title and author information set; content in progress.

Creating a New Paper

Use run.sh to scaffold a new paper from the AMS-LaTeX template:

./run.sh init_paper "Your Paper Title"

This creates a new directory (name derived from the title) containing a paper.tex pre-filled with the title and author.

Setup

The Python library code in lib/ requires SageMath. Run setup once per machine:

./run.sh setup <sage_python_path> <sage_site_packages> [system_name]
  • sage_python_path — path to the SageMath Python interpreter (e.g. /opt/sage/local/bin/python3)
  • sage_site_packages — path to SageMath's site-packages directory
  • system_name — optional label for this machine (defaults to hostname -s); used to store per-machine env files as .env.<system_name>

On subsequent runs the paths default to whatever was saved in .env, so ./run.sh setup alone re-runs setup with the existing configuration.

Setup also compiles the plantri submodule via make.

Running Sage

To run a Sage script with plantri available on PATH:

./run.sh sage <script.py> [args...]

Or to open an interactive Sage session:

./run.sh sage

Linting

./run.sh lint

Runs pyright and pylint on lib/ using the SageMath Python interpreter.

Shell Completion

To enable tab-completion for run.sh in zsh, add this to your .zshrc:

eval "$(path/to/run.sh completion)"

Or source it once in the current shell session:

eval "$(./run.sh completion)"

Building

Papers are compiled with LaTeX. From within a paper directory:

latexmk -pdf paper.tex
S
Description
No description provided
Readme 277 MiB
Languages
Python 69%
TeX 30.8%
Shell 0.2%