27dea58ae1
test / integration-macos (pull_request) Has been skipped
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 11s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 34s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 44s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 1m2s
test / integration-firecracker (pull_request) Successful in 2m6s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 17s
test / publish-infra (pull_request) Has been skipped
Make the advisory macOS Apple Container job run on workflow_dispatch only, removing the push-to-`main` trigger so a single non-redundant laptop never runs unattended on every push. Updates the job comment, docs/ci.md, README CI note, and the PRD accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
51 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
51 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# CI
|
|
|
|
The test workflow lives at [`.gitea/workflows/test.yml`](../.gitea/workflows/test.yml).
|
|
It runs the unit suite plus one integration job per backend
|
|
(`integration-docker`, `integration-firecracker`, `integration-macos`) on:
|
|
|
|
- every push to a branch with an open pull request, and
|
|
- every push to `main`.
|
|
|
|
`integration-macos` is the exception: it is **advisory**, running only on
|
|
`workflow_dispatch` (manual dispatch), never on push or pull requests. It targets the
|
|
Apple Container backend on a self-hosted macOS runner (label `macos`,
|
|
registered in host mode — Apple Container can't run in a Linux container, so it
|
|
can't reuse the `kvm` runner). A single non-redundant laptop must not be able
|
|
to block a PR merge, so the job stays out of the `coverage` job's `needs` and
|
|
its coverage never feeds the diff-coverage gate. Because the infra container is
|
|
a singleton (`bot-bottle-mac-infra`), the job declares a `concurrency` group
|
|
and tears the container down on exit; keep runner concurrency at 1. See the
|
|
README "macOS Apple Container" CI note for runner provisioning.
|
|
|
|
Each integration job selects its backend via `BOT_BOTTLE_BACKEND` and
|
|
runs a **preflight** (`./cli.py backend status --backend=<name>`) that
|
|
prints a clear per-check readiness summary and fails the job when the
|
|
backend is missing — so absent infrastructure is visible at the job level
|
|
rather than hidden among per-test `unittest.skip` lines. The skip guards in
|
|
[`tests/_backend.py`](../tests/_backend.py) gate on the same readiness
|
|
check (`bot_bottle.backend.has_backend`): backend-agnostic tests use
|
|
`skip_unless_selected_backend_available()` and run through whichever
|
|
backend is selected (checking, e.g., Linux + `/dev/kvm` for Firecracker
|
|
rather than unrelated Docker availability); Docker-implementation tests use
|
|
`skip_unless_backend("docker")` and no-op under a non-Docker run.
|
|
|
|
A small subset of integration tests skip when running specifically
|
|
under Gitea Actions (`GITEA_ACTIONS=true`), because `act_runner` runs
|
|
the job inside a container with the host's `/var/run/docker.sock`
|
|
mounted in. That topology breaks two assumptions those tests make:
|
|
|
|
- networks created via the host daemon aren't always visible to a
|
|
same-process `docker network ls` call from inside the job container,
|
|
and
|
|
- ports published by sibling containers land on the host's loopback,
|
|
not on the job container's `127.0.0.1` — so HTTP probes against
|
|
`http://127.0.0.1:<host_port>` from inside the job time out.
|
|
|
|
The affected tests (`test_orphan_cleanup.test_create_and_remove`,
|
|
`test_gateway_image.TestGatewayImage`) still run
|
|
locally where the test process and Docker daemon share a host.
|
|
Making them work in CI is a follow-up: either re-write them to
|
|
discover container IPs via `docker inspect`, or reconfigure the
|
|
runner with host networking.
|