We use Gitea, not an abstract forge. Reword the docs added in this
branch: "forge thread" -> "Gitea thread", and the research note's
generic "forge" -> "Gitea" / "hosting provider" as context demands,
keeping its portability argument coherent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Document what research notes are (opinionated investigations of a
question/design space), their unnumbered kebab-case naming, and their
loose verdict-first shape — explicitly freeform, not a template. Point
the AGENTS.md research line at it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Remove the one-line docs/INDEX.md (its directory pointers are covered
by docs/README.md's "when to write which document" table). Add
docs/prds/README.md documenting the PRD naming, Status lifecycle, and
section format. Repoint the AGENTS.md repository-layout list at the
new READMEs and add the decisions/ dir.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the document-type comparison out of docs/decisions/README.md
(where it only surfaced if you were already in the decisions dir) up
to a new docs/README.md, renamed "When to write which document".
Leave a pointer from the decisions README.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per review on PR #97: an index that lists every ADR is a sync
burden. The files in docs/decisions/ are the index.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add an "Alternatives considered" section enumerating the design
options from issue #88 (duplicate bottles / agent-side bottle_config
/ bottle-side extends) and why extends won, so the PRD stands without
the forge thread. Repoint the two phrases that depended on the #88
comment thread at the new section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add docs/decisions/ with a convention README and back-fill two
decisions that previously had no in-repo home: merging PRs with
rebase (ADR 0001) and the agent-identity claimed-not-vouched trust
posture from PRD 0027 (ADR 0002). Point docs/INDEX.md at it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Analyze tracking feature requests in Gitea against the project's
in-repo PRDs/research notes, given the goal of keeping decision
history portable and not provider-locked. Recommends demoting issues
to an ephemeral inbox and reifying durable rationale into the repo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
didericis