a40131086569328c2b1a869d6b4d565d65491acc
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
cd9f023f3d |
docs: name bot-bottle, not ./cli.py, in every instruction
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 11s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 59s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
test / coverage (push) Successful in 21s
test / image-input-builds (push) Successful in 44s
test / image-input-builds (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
test / unit (push) Successful in 57s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 20s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 1m3s
Update Quality Badges / update-badges (push) Successful in 1m12s
test / integration-docker (push) Successful in 1m0s
`doctor` told users to run `./cli.py backend setup`. cli.py is a four-line wrapper at the repo root that calls bot_bottle.cli:main, and it does not ship — [tool.setuptools.packages.find] includes only bot_bottle*, so anyone who installed rather than cloned has no such file. Confirmed against a real install: the user's tree contains exactly one executable, `bot-bottle`, and no cli.py anywhere, while doctor recommended `./cli.py` three times. Invisible in development, where ./cli.py works fine from a checkout, which is why only a clean-install test surfaced it. The two entry points are the same code, so the fix is to name the one that always exists. 141 replacements across 45 files: the runtime messages that caused this, plus README, docs, PRDs, research notes and test prose, so nothing teaches the invocation a user cannot run. scripts/demo.sh is deliberately untouched — it *executes* ./cli.py from a checkout, where that is the correct and available path. Verified end to end: a sandbox install now reports "Run: bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker", and bot-bottle is on that user's PATH. Unit suite unchanged against the pre-existing baseline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5 |
||
|
|
72165b5db5 |
fix(git-gate): reject AGit review refs in pre-receive
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 54s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 17s
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 8s
test / unit (push) Successful in 54s
Update Quality Badges / update-badges (push) Successful in 54s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 1m4s
test / integration-docker (push) Successful in 1m9s
test / coverage (push) Successful in 38s
Gitea AGit accepts pushes to refs/for/*, refs/draft/*, and refs/for-review/* and opens pull requests backed by server-managed refs/pull/<n>/head refs rather than ordinary refs/heads/* branches. That breaks the git-gate branch workflow: follow-up commits can't be pushed back through the branch, and Gitea rejects later direct updates to the generated review ref, so recovery means recreating the PR. Add a Phase 0 guard to the shared pre-receive hook that rejects creation or update of those AGit review refs before any gitleaks scan or upstream forward, with a message pointing callers at the branch-backed PR workflow. Deletions (new == zero) stay allowed so legacy AGit refs can still be cleaned up; normal branches and tags are untouched. Closes #506 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ce744a85c4 |
refactor(gateway): split data-plane files into egress/supervisor/git_gate services
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 11s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 17s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 49s
lint / lint (push) Failing after 2m49s
test / integration-firecracker (pull_request) Successful in 3m35s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / publish-infra (pull_request) Has been skipped
Group the gateway's data-plane modules into three service sub-packages mirroring the host-side trio (bot_bottle.egress / .supervisor / .git_gate): gateway/egress/ addon_core, addon, dlp_config, dlp_detectors gateway/supervisor/ server (was supervise_server) gateway/git_gate/ render, http_backend Prefix-stripped filenames now that the package namespaces them; each sub-package has a thin docstring __init__ (no eager imports, cheap leaf loads). The two cross-cutting files stay at the gateway root: policy_resolver (shared per-client lookup) and gateway_init, renamed to bootstrap now that gateway/ already namespaces it. Updated all importers (bot_bottle + tests), the in-VM/container `-m` launch strings, the Dockerfile.gateway addon shim + ENTRYPOINT, and the five gateway entries in scripts/critical-modules.txt. Full unit suite green (2243). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |