feat(orchestrator): durable launch-broker secret via TrustDomain (#468)
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Failing after 11s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 16s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Failing after 45s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 56s
test / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
lint / lint (push) Failing after 14m57s

Chunk 2 of the host-control-server stack: close the PRD's **durable
secret** gap and replace chunk 1's BOT_BOTTLE_BROKER_SECRET stopgap.

- trust_domain.py: two new domains. LAUNCH_BROKER holds the durable
  HS256 key both the orchestrator (signer) and the host control server
  (verifier) share for the broker's launch JWT — a host-canonical key
  file minted 0600 on first use, so a restarted orchestrator re-verifies
  against the same key. HOST_CONTROLLER is the separate domain for the
  controller's own lifecycle endpoints, keyed by a key the orchestrator
  never holds (its role is `host`, deliberately outside control-plane
  ROLES). LaunchBrokerProvisioning is the fail-closed seam.
- orchestrator_auth.py: ROLE_HOST, outside ROLES.
- paths.py: key-file + env-var constants for both domains.

Key resolution is split by owner (addresses codex review on #497):
broker_secret(allow_host_file=...) — the host controller / dev-harness
(True) may mint/read the durable host key file it owns; the GUEST
orchestrator (--broker http, default False) must be *injected* the key
and fails closed if it isn't. A guest that fell back to the host file
would mint a process-local key unrelated to the host controller's, so
startup would succeed but every launch would 401 — this prevents that
silent divergence.

Tested: domain boundary + separation, provisioning fail-closed, and
broker_secret env-only (guest) vs host-file (host) resolution. pyright
clean; pylint 9.86.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-26 07:34:36 +00:00
parent 1553a98275
commit 5f1d3fbd15
8 changed files with 288 additions and 59 deletions
+72 -1
View File
@@ -6,10 +6,13 @@ import unittest
from unittest.mock import patch
from bot_bottle import orchestrator_auth
from bot_bottle.orchestrator_auth import ROLE_CLI, ROLE_GATEWAY
from bot_bottle.orchestrator_auth import ROLE_CLI, ROLE_GATEWAY, ROLE_HOST
from bot_bottle.trust_domain import (
CONTROL_PLANE,
HOST_CONTROLLER,
LAUNCH_BROKER,
ControlPlaneProvisioning,
LaunchBrokerProvisioning,
ProvisioningError,
TrustDomain,
)
@@ -101,5 +104,73 @@ class TestControlPlaneProvisioning(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertNotEqual(ROLE_CLI, CONTROL_PLANE.verify(tok, "k"))
class TestLaunchBrokerAndHostControllerDomains(unittest.TestCase):
"""The real #468 domains: the launch-broker key (shared by orchestrator +
host controller) and the host controller's own lifecycle key."""
def test_launch_broker_mints_no_role_tokens(self) -> None:
# Empty role set — it provides durable key material for the broker's own
# launch JWT, not orchestrator_auth role tokens.
self.assertEqual(frozenset(), LAUNCH_BROKER.roles)
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key", return_value="k"):
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
LAUNCH_BROKER.mint(ROLE_CLI)
def test_host_controller_signs_host_role_only(self) -> None:
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key", return_value="k"):
tok = HOST_CONTROLLER.mint(ROLE_HOST)
self.assertEqual(ROLE_HOST, HOST_CONTROLLER.verify(tok, "k"))
# A control-plane `cli` token (the orchestrator's key) never verifies as a
# host-controller role — the orchestrator can't forge lifecycle creds.
cli_tok = orchestrator_auth.mint(ROLE_CLI, "k")
self.assertIsNone(HOST_CONTROLLER.verify(cli_tok, "k"))
def test_control_plane_cannot_mint_the_host_role(self) -> None:
# `host` is outside the control-plane role set on purpose.
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key", return_value="k"):
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
CONTROL_PLANE.mint(ROLE_HOST)
def test_the_three_domains_use_distinct_keys_and_env_vars(self) -> None:
self.assertEqual(3, len({
CONTROL_PLANE.key_filename,
LAUNCH_BROKER.key_filename,
HOST_CONTROLLER.key_filename,
}))
self.assertEqual(3, len({
CONTROL_PLANE.key_env, LAUNCH_BROKER.key_env, HOST_CONTROLLER.key_env,
}))
class TestLaunchBrokerProvisioning(unittest.TestCase):
def test_broker_key_returns_the_durable_key(self) -> None:
prov = LaunchBrokerProvisioning()
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key", return_value="bk"):
self.assertEqual("bk", prov.broker_key())
def test_broker_key_fail_closes_when_empty(self) -> None:
# An empty key would leave the host controller unable to verify any
# launch — fail-closed rather than hand back a useless/dangerous key.
prov = LaunchBrokerProvisioning()
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key", return_value=""):
with self.assertRaises(ProvisioningError):
prov.broker_key()
def test_controller_key_is_distinct_from_the_broker_key(self) -> None:
# The orchestrator holds the broker key but NEVER the controller key.
prov = LaunchBrokerProvisioning()
keys = {"launch-broker-key": "bk", "host-controller-key": "ck"}
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key",
side_effect=keys.__getitem__):
self.assertEqual("bk", prov.broker_key())
self.assertEqual("ck", prov.controller_key())
def test_controller_key_fail_closes_when_empty(self) -> None:
prov = LaunchBrokerProvisioning()
with patch("bot_bottle.trust_domain.host_signing_key", return_value=""):
with self.assertRaises(ProvisioningError):
prov.controller_key()
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main()