Findings at n=9 (50 triangulations, orbits fully exhaustible):
- 36 bridge-derived, 14 NOT bridge-derived. So bridge-derived is a PROPER
subclass of derived (49 derived at n=9). All 14 non-bridge graphs are
intertwining trees -- as are all 50, necessarily: intertwining tree
<=> dual Hamiltonian, and the smallest non-Hamiltonian 3-connected cubic
planar graph has 38 vertices, i.e. dual on 2n-4=38 => n=21. Hence every
triangulation with n<=20 is an intertwining tree, and the disjunction
"bridge-derived OR intertwining" is trivially true below n=21. The 4
Holton-McKay duals are the first non-intertwining triangulations.
- Static parity-subgraph invariants (Betti numbers, component counts,
cross-edge count, existence of an all-forest partition) do NOT separate
bridge-derived from non-bridge-derived -- both classes realize beta=0
partitions and identical ranges. Bridge-derivability is dynamical, not a
simple static invariant; no easy obstruction.
- Side lemma: every valid parity partition of an n-vertex triangulation has
exactly 2n-4 cross edges (intra-edges = n-2). Holds for all n=9 graphs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
didericis
1a71658349