%% filename: amsart-template.tex %% American Mathematical Society %% AMS-LaTeX v.2 template for use with amsart %% ==================================================================== \documentclass{amsart} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{graphicx} \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section] \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma} \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary} \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition} \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition} \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example} \newtheorem{xca}[theorem]{Exercise} \theoremstyle{remark} \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark} \numberwithin{equation}{section} \begin{document} \title{Heawood Restrictions on Nested Tire Graph Duals} % author one information \author{Eric Bauerfeld} \address{} \curraddr{} \email{} \thanks{} \subjclass[2010]{Primary } \keywords{plane graph, triangulation, plane depth, level edge, dual graph, tire graph, Heawood number} \date{} \dedicatory{} \begin{abstract} %% TODO: abstract. Following \cite{bauerfeld-nested-tires}, which establishes %% the basic vocabulary of tire graphs and dual depth, we study the Heawood %% (mod-3 / face-sum) restrictions imposed on the duals of nested tire graphs. \end{abstract} \maketitle \section{Introduction} A classical theorem of Tait recasts the Four Colour Theorem in dual, edge-colouring terms: a plane triangulation $G$ is properly $4$-vertex-colourable if and only if its dual cubic graph $G'$ is properly $3$-edge-colourable. Thus a minimal counterexample to the Four Colour Theorem -- a smallest triangulation admitting no proper $4$-colouring -- corresponds to a smallest cubic plane graph admitting no proper $3$-edge-colouring. This paper continues the series studying that structure through the lens of \emph{nested level duals}. The foundational vocabulary --- level sources, levels, the inner planar dual $G'$ and its dual depth, and tire graphs --- is developed in the companion paper \cite{bauerfeld-nested-tires}; we refer to that paper for those definitions and rely on them throughout. In particular we use, without restating, the notions of: \begin{itemize} \item \emph{level source} $S$ and $G$-vertex levels $\ell_G(v)$; \item the inner planar dual $G'$ (\cite[Definition~1.3]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}); \item \emph{dual depth} $\delta_G(d_f)$ (\cite[Definition~1.4]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}); \item \emph{tire graph} $T = (B_{\mathrm{out}}, O, E_{\mathrm{ann}})$ with outer/inner boundaries and annular edges (\cite[Definition~1.5]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}); \item the \emph{tire-component lemma} (\cite[Lemma~1.8]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}); and \item the \emph{tire-tread partition theorem} (\cite[Theorem~1.9]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}). \end{itemize} Throughout, $G = (V, E)$ is a plane maximal planar graph (a triangulation) with a fixed planar embedding $\Pi_G$. We write $|V| = n$, so $|E| = 3n - 6$ and $G$ has $2n - 4$ triangular faces. The classical input is Heawood's face-sum identity \cite{Heawood1898}: for any proper $3$-edge-colouring of a cubic plane graph $H$, assigning each face of $H$ a number in $\{+1, -1\}$ can be done so that the labels around every vertex of $H$ sum to $0 \pmod 3$. In the triangulation $G$ dual to $H$ this becomes a $\{+1, -1\}$ labelling of the \emph{faces} of $G$ whose incident-face sum at every vertex of $G$ vanishes mod $3$. Our aim is to record what this restriction forces along the boundary cycles of a nested tire graph, and to formulate a chain-pigeonhole programme in this Heawood labelling parallel to the medial programme of \cite{bauerfeld-medial-tires}. \section{Connected tire clusters} \label{sec:tire-clusters} The tire treads at a fixed depth partition the depth-$d$ faces of $G$ \cite{bauerfeld-nested-tires}, but distinct depth-$d$ tires need not be vertex-disjoint: a single vertex of $G$ may lie on the source-side boundary of several depth-$d$ tires at once (this occurs exactly when the depth-$d$ faces around that vertex are split into more than one arc by depth-$(d{-}1)$ faces). We organise the depth-$d$ tires by this sharing. \begin{lemma}[Same-depth tires meet only in vertices] \label{lem:same-depth-vertex-meet} Let $T \neq T'$ be two distinct tire treads at the same depth $d$ in $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$, arising from connected components $C', C''$ of the depth-$d$ dual subgraph $G'_d$. Then $T$ and $T'$ share no edge of $G$; any intersection $V(T) \cap V(T')$ consists of isolated vertices. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} An edge $e$ of $G$ shared by two depth-$d$ annular faces $f_1, f_2$ is, by definition of the inner dual \cite[Definition~1.3]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}, a dual edge of $G'$ joining $d_{f_1}$ and $d_{f_2}$; since $\delta(d_{f_1}) = \delta(d_{f_2}) = d$, this edge lies in $G'_d$, so $d_{f_1}$ and $d_{f_2}$ belong to the same component of $G'_d$. Hence no edge of $G$ is shared by annular faces of two \emph{different} components, and distinct depth-$d$ tires share no edge. Their intersection is therefore a set of isolated vertices. \end{proof} \begin{definition}[Connected tire cluster] \label{def:connected-tire-cluster} Fix a nested tire decomposition $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ and a depth $d$. On the set of depth-$d$ tire treads define the relation \[ T \sim T' \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad V(T) \cap V(T') \neq \varnothing . \] A \emph{connected tire cluster} at depth $d$ is the subgraph of $G$ \[ \mathsf{K} \;=\; \bigcup_{i} T_i \;\subseteq\; G \] obtained as the union (of underlying plane graphs) of the tires in a single connected component $\{T_i\}$ of the transitive closure of $\sim$. A cluster consisting of a single tire is \emph{trivial}; the connected tire clusters at depth $d$ partition the depth-$d$ tires. \end{definition} \begin{remark} \label{rem:cluster-cut-vertices} By Lemma~\ref{lem:same-depth-vertex-meet} the constituent tires of a connected tire cluster are joined only at shared vertices, each of which is a cut vertex of $\mathsf{K}$; a connected tire cluster is thus a ``cactus of tires'' and is in general \emph{not} itself a tire graph, since the annulus structure of \cite[Definition~1.5]{bauerfeld-nested-tires} fails at each such pinch. The shared (cut) vertices are precisely the vertices that belong to more than one depth-$d$ tire. \end{remark} A single vertex may belong to several tires at one depth --- the high-degree case where its depth-$d$ faces split into many arcs --- so the number of \emph{tires} through a vertex is unbounded. Clustering collapses exactly this multiplicity: all tires through a vertex at a fixed depth share that vertex, hence lie in one cluster. The cluster count is therefore controlled. \begin{proposition}[A vertex meets at most two clusters] \label{prop:two-clusters-per-vertex} Every vertex $v \in V(G)$ belongs to at most two connected tire clusters, namely at most one at each of the two consecutive depths $\ell_G(v) - 1$ and $\ell_G(v)$. In particular a source vertex ($\ell_G(v) = 0$) belongs to a single cluster. \end{proposition} \begin{proof} Write $\ell = \ell_G(v)$. \emph{Step 1: every bounded face incident to $v$ has dual depth $\ell - 1$ or $\ell$.} Let $f$ be a bounded triangular face with $v \in V(f)$. Then $\delta_G(d_f) = \min_{u \in V(f)} \ell_G(u) \le \ell_G(v) = \ell$. The other two vertices of $f$ are adjacent to $v$ in $G$, and the level function $\ell_G(\cdot) = \mathrm{dist}_G(\cdot, S)$ is $1$-Lipschitz along edges, so each has level at least $\ell - 1$; hence $\delta_G(d_f) \ge \ell - 1$. Thus $\delta_G(d_f) \in \{\ell-1, \ell\}$ (only $\delta_G(d_f) = 0$ when $\ell = 0$), so $v$ bounds faces of, and therefore belongs to tires of, no depth other than $\ell - 1$ or $\ell$. \emph{Step 2: at each depth, all tires through $v$ lie in one cluster.} Fix $d \in \{\ell-1, \ell\}$ and let $T, T'$ be depth-$d$ tires with $v \in V(T) \cap V(T')$. Then $V(T) \cap V(T') \ne \varnothing$, so $T \sim T'$ in the sense of Definition~\ref{def:connected-tire-cluster}, and all depth-$d$ tires containing $v$ lie in a single connected component of $\sim$ --- one connected tire cluster $\mathsf{K}_d$. Combining the two steps, $v$ belongs to at most the clusters $\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}$ and $\mathsf{K}_{\ell}$, i.e.\ to at most two connected tire clusters; when $\ell = 0$ only $\mathsf{K}_0$ occurs. \end{proof} \section{Heawood restrictions on the tire dual} \label{sec:heawood-restrictions} We work inside a fixed nested tire decomposition $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ of $G$ from a single-vertex level source $S$ \cite{bauerfeld-nested-tires}, and use the tire data $T = (B_{\mathrm{out}}, O, E_{\mathrm{ann}})$ with annular faces $F_{\mathrm{ann}}$, outer boundary $B_{\mathrm{out}}$, and inner boundary $B_{\mathrm{in}}$ (\cite[Definition~1.5]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}). Since $O$ is outerplanar, every vertex of a tire lies on $B_{\mathrm{out}}$ or on the inner-boundary walk $B_{\mathrm{in}}$; a tire has no interior vertices. \begin{definition}[Heawood face-labelling of a tire] \label{def:heawood-labelling} A \emph{Heawood face-labelling} of a tire graph $T$ is a map \[ \lambda : F_{\mathrm{ann}} \longrightarrow \{+1, -1\} \] assigning a sign to each annular face of $T$. For a vertex $v \in V(T)$, write $F_{\mathrm{ann}}(v) \subseteq F_{\mathrm{ann}}$ for the set of annular faces of $T$ incident to $v$, and define the \emph{induced vertex value} \[ \lambda^{\!*}(v) \;:=\; \sum_{f \in F_{\mathrm{ann}}(v)} \lambda(f) \;\;\bmod 3 \;\in\; \{0, 1, -1\}. \] The value $\lambda^{\!*}(v)$ is the \emph{partial} face-sum at $v$ taken over the annular faces of $T$ alone, not over all faces of $G$ incident to $v$. \end{definition} \begin{remark} \label{rem:no-interior-constraint} Because a tire has no interior vertices, every annular face of $T$ is incident to $B_{\mathrm{out}} \cup B_{\mathrm{in}}$, and a Heawood face-labelling is subject to \emph{no} internal constraint: all $2^{|F_{\mathrm{ann}}|}$ sign assignments are admissible. The Heawood restriction is felt only on the two boundary cycles, through the induced vertex values $\lambda^{\!*}$. \end{remark} \begin{definition}[Induced boundary sequences] \label{def:boundary-sequences} Let $\lambda$ be a Heawood face-labelling of $T$. Reading the vertices of $B_{\mathrm{out}}$ in clockwise order $v_0, v_1, \dots, v_{p-1}$, the \emph{outer Heawood sequence} of $(T, \lambda)$ is \[ \sigma_{\mathrm{out}}(T, \lambda) \;:=\; \bigl(\lambda^{\!*}(v_0), \dots, \lambda^{\!*}(v_{p-1})\bigr) \;\in\; \{0, 1, -1\}^{p}. \] Reading the inner-boundary walk $B_{\mathrm{in}}$ in clockwise order $w_0, \dots, w_{q-1}$ gives the \emph{inner Heawood sequence} $\sigma_{\mathrm{in}}(T, \lambda) \in \{0, 1, -1\}^{q}$. The \emph{Heawood restriction relation} of $T$ is the set \[ R_T \;:=\; \bigl\{\, \bigl(\sigma_{\mathrm{out}}(T, \lambda),\, \sigma_{\mathrm{in}}(T, \lambda)\bigr) \;:\; \lambda : F_{\mathrm{ann}} \to \{+1, -1\} \,\bigr\} \] of all (outer, inner) sequence pairs realisable by a single face-labelling, read up to rotation and the global sign-flip $\lambda \mapsto -\lambda$ (equivalently $\sigma \mapsto -\sigma$). \end{definition} \begin{definition}[Heawood compatibility across an interface] \label{def:heawood-compatible} Let $T$ be a tire and $T' \in \mathcal{T}(G, S)$ a child of $T$, so the outer boundary cycle $B_{\mathrm{out}}^{(T')}$ coincides with a bounded face of $O^{(T)}$; let $\gamma$ be this shared cycle, of length $L$, and let $v$ range over its vertices. Heawood face-labellings $\lambda$ of $T$ and $\lambda'$ of $T'$ are \emph{compatible along $\gamma$} if at every shared vertex $v$, \[ \lambda^{\!*}(v) + (\lambda')^{\!*}(v) \;\equiv\; 0 \pmod 3, \] i.e.\ $0$ is paired with $0$ and $+1$ with $-1$. Equivalently, the inner Heawood sequence of $T$ on $\gamma$ is the pointwise negation mod $3$ of the outer Heawood sequence of $T'$ on $\gamma$, after reversing one of the two clockwise readings to account for the opposite rotational senses in which $T$ and $T'$ traverse $\gamma$. \end{definition} \begin{remark} \label{rem:compat-is-heawood} Call $v$ \emph{interior} if it is not incident to the outer face of $\Pi_G$. For an interior vertex every incident face is bounded, and compatibility along $\gamma$ at $v$ is exactly the statement that the incident-face sum at $v$ --- over the parent's annular faces together with the child's --- vanishes mod $3$: \begin{equation} \label{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual} \sum_{f \ni v} \lambda(f) \;\equiv\; 0 \pmod 3 \qquad\text{for every interior vertex } v \in V(G), \end{equation} the sum ranging over the bounded faces incident to $v$. The interfaces of $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ are interior level cycles, so cluster compatibility only ever constrains interior vertices and is untouched by the outer face. To pass from \eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual} to a colouring one must account for the outer face: an outer-boundary vertex is incident to the unbounded face $f_\infty$, whose label is omitted from the bounded sum. Extend $\lambda$ by a single label $\lambda(f_\infty) \in \{+1, -1\}$ on $f_\infty$. Then a family of Heawood face-labellings that is pairwise compatible along every interface of $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ assembles into a $\{+1,-1\}$ labelling of \emph{all} faces of $G$ for which $\sum_{f \ni v} \lambda(f) \equiv 0 \pmod 3$ holds at every vertex --- the outer-boundary vertices now carrying $\lambda(f_\infty)$ in their sum. This is Heawood's face-sum identity \cite{Heawood1898} for a proper $3$-edge-colouring of the full cubic dual of $G$, hence (by Tait) a proper $4$-vertex-colouring of $G$. \end{remark} \subsection*{Why the programme runs between nested clusters} The vanishing condition \eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual} at a vertex $v$ is a constraint on the \emph{full} face-star of $v$. To run a pigeonhole between two objects --- a child and a parent --- we need that full sum to split as exactly two one-sided contributions, so that each vertex label is the combination of a single child value and a single parent value. This is true at the level of connected tire clusters, and \emph{false} at the level of individual tires. Extend a Heawood face-labelling to a connected tire cluster $\mathsf{K}$ by labelling every annular face of every tire of $\mathsf{K}$, and for $v \in V(\mathsf{K})$ write \[ \lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}}(v) \;:=\; \sum_{f} \lambda(f) \;\bmod 3, \] the sum over the annular faces of $\mathsf{K}$ incident to $v$. \begin{proposition}[Two-sided cluster decomposition at a vertex] \label{prop:two-sided-decomposition} Let $v \in V(G)$ have level $\ell = \ell_G(v)$, and let $\mathsf{K}_{\ell}$ and $\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}$ be the at most two connected tire clusters containing $v$, of depths $\ell$ and $\ell-1$ respectively (Proposition~\ref{prop:two-clusters-per-vertex}). Then the bounded faces of $G$ incident to $v$ partition into the annular faces of $\mathsf{K}_{\ell}$ at $v$ and the annular faces of $\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}$ at $v$, and \[ \sum_{f \ni v} \lambda(f) \;\equiv\; \lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_{\ell}}(v) + \lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}}(v) \pmod 3 . \] Each one-sided value $\lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_d}(v)$ is the \emph{complete} sum over all depth-$d$ faces at $v$, so the Heawood condition \eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual} at $v$ reads \[ \lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_{\ell}}(v) + \lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}}(v) \;\equiv\; 0 \pmod 3 , \] a pairing between the single child cluster $\mathsf{K}_{\ell}$ and the single parent cluster $\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}$. (When $\ell = 0$, or when $v$ bounds no depth-$\ell$ face, only one term is present.) \end{proposition} \begin{proof} By Proposition~\ref{prop:two-clusters-per-vertex} (Step~1) every bounded face incident to $v$ has depth $\ell-1$ or $\ell$, partitioning the incident faces by depth; by Step~2 all depth-$\ell$ faces at $v$ lie in the single cluster $\mathsf{K}_{\ell}$ and all depth-$(\ell-1)$ faces at $v$ in $\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}$. Hence the depth-$\ell$ part is exactly the annular faces of $\mathsf{K}_{\ell}$ at $v$, the depth-$(\ell-1)$ part those of $\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}$, and summing $\lambda$ over the two parts gives the identity; \eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual} is its vanishing. \end{proof} \begin{remark}[Failure at the tire level] \label{rem:why-clusters} Proposition~\ref{prop:two-sided-decomposition} is what makes the binary parent/child pairing possible, and it requires the cluster. A vertex $v$ may lie on many depth-$\ell$ tires --- the unbounded case of Section~\ref{sec:tire-clusters} --- and the per-tire value $\lambda^{\!*}(v)$ of Definition~\ref{def:heawood-labelling} then records only the faces of \emph{one} tire at $v$, a fragment of $v$'s face-star. No single child tire carries the complete depth-$\ell$ sum, so the label $\sum_{f \ni v}\lambda(f)$ cannot be written as one child value plus one parent value, and per-tire compatibility (Definition~\ref{def:heawood-compatible}) fails to assemble to \eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual}. Clustering repairs this: Proposition~\ref{prop:two-clusters-per-vertex} guarantees exactly one cluster meets $v$ on each side, so $\lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_{\ell}}(v)$ is the complete child contribution and $\lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}_{\ell-1}}(v)$ the complete parent contribution. Every vertex label is then realised as the combination of a single child-cluster value with a single parent-cluster value, and the pigeonhole programme below chains \emph{nested connected tire clusters} rather than individual tires. \end{remark} We write $R_{\mathsf{K}}$ for the \emph{cluster Heawood restriction relation}: the set of (outer, inner) boundary Heawood sequence pairs realisable by a face-labelling of $\mathsf{K}$, defined as in Definition~\ref{def:boundary-sequences} but with the outer and inner boundaries of the cluster and the complete one-sided values $\lambda^{\!*}_{\mathsf{K}}$ in place of a single tire's, read up to rotation and global sign-flip. By Proposition~\ref{prop:two-sided-decomposition} two nested clusters are compatible along their shared interface exactly when the inner sequence of the parent is the pointwise negation mod $3$ of the outer sequence of the child (after the orientation reversal of Definition~\ref{def:heawood-compatible}). \begin{conjecture}[Heawood chain-pigeonhole principle] \label{conj:heawood-chain-pigeonhole} There is a function $N(k)$ such that the following holds. Let \[ \mathsf{K}_0 \supset \mathsf{K}_1 \supset \cdots \supset \mathsf{K}_{N(k)} \] be a nested chain of connected tire clusters in $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ whose shared interfaces have length at most $k$. Then two adjacent cluster restriction relations $R_{\mathsf{K}_i}, R_{\mathsf{K}_{i+1}}$ in the chain admit compatible face-labellings along their shared interface, after rotation and global sign-flip. Equivalently, the chain contains a local gluing step that cannot be obstructed by disjoint Heawood boundary restrictions. \end{conjecture} \begin{conjecture}[Heawood cluster route to the Four Colour Theorem] \label{conj:heawood-route-fct} For every plane triangulation $G$ and every level source $S$, the cluster Heawood restriction relations $\{R_{\mathsf{K}} : \mathsf{K} \text{ a connected tire cluster}\}$ admit a selection of face-labellings that is compatible along every cluster interface. By Proposition~\ref{prop:two-sided-decomposition} and Remark~\ref{rem:compat-is-heawood} this yields a $\{+1,-1\}$ face-labelling of $G$ satisfying \eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual}, hence $G$ is properly $4$-vertex-colourable. \end{conjecture} %% TODO: realisability of $R_{\mathsf{K}}$ per cluster; counting / %% pigeonhole bound giving $N(k)$; orientation/reversal bookkeeping on %% the shared interface. \section{The constraint floor} \label{sec:constraint-floor} A nested substructure constrains its outer interface through the set of Heawood boundary sequences it can realise. By the self-similarity of the tire decomposition (\cite{bauerfeld-nested-tires}), the region $G_T$ enclosed by a tire's outer cycle, away from the source, is itself a triangulated disk; we record how tightly any such disk can constrain its boundary. The bound below depends only on the disk triangulation, not on a tire-tree labelling. \begin{definition}[Achievable boundary set of a disk] \label{def:achievable-boundary-set} Let $D$ be a triangulated disk whose boundary is a simple $n$-cycle $C = (v_0, \dots, v_{n-1})$. Call a Heawood face-labelling $\lambda : F(D) \to \{+1,-1\}$ \emph{interior-valid} if $\sum_{f \ni w} \lambda(f) \equiv 0 \pmod 3$ at every interior vertex $w$ of $D$ (no condition on $C$). The \emph{achievable boundary set} of $D$ is \[ \Phi(D) \;:=\; \bigl\{\, (\lambda^{*}(v_0), \dots, \lambda^{*}(v_{n-1})) \;:\; \lambda \text{ interior-valid} \,\bigr\} \;\subseteq\; \{0,1,-1\}^{n} . \] \end{definition} \begin{proposition}[Constraint floor] \label{prop:constraint-floor} For every triangulated disk $D$ with boundary an $n$-cycle, \[ |\Phi(D)| \;\ge\; 2^{\,n-2}, \] and the bound is attained --- already by the triangulation of the $n$-gon with no interior vertices. Consequently no nested structure constrains the outer cycle below $2^{\,n-2}$ achievable Heawood sequences; the trivial tire is already maximally constraining. \end{proposition} \begin{proof}[Proof of attainment] Triangulate the $n$-gon as a fan from $v_0$, with faces $\{v_0, v_i, v_{i+1}\}$ for $1 \le i \le n-2$ and labels $\lambda_i := \lambda(\{v_0, v_i, v_{i+1}\})$; there are no interior vertices, so every labelling is interior-valid. The induced boundary values are \[ \lambda^{*}(v_1) = \lambda_1, \quad \lambda^{*}(v_i) = \lambda_{i-1} + \lambda_i \ \ (1 < i < n-1), \quad \lambda^{*}(v_{n-1}) = \lambda_{n-2}, \quad \lambda^{*}(v_0) = \textstyle\sum_{j} \lambda_j . \] From $\lambda^{*}(v_1)$ and the relations $\lambda_i = \lambda^{*}(v_i) - \lambda_{i-1}$ the tuple $(\lambda_1, \dots, \lambda_{n-2}) \in \{+1,-1\}^{n-2}$ is recovered from the boundary sequence, so the map $\lambda \mapsto \lambda^{*}|_C$ is injective and $|\Phi(D)| = 2^{\,n-2}$. \end{proof} \begin{remark}[Depth is freedom-positive] \label{rem:freedom-positive} The lower bound is plausible from a counting balance. A triangulated disk with $k$ interior vertices has $2k + n - 2$ faces (Euler) and imposes exactly $k$ interior Heawood constraints, one per interior vertex. So each interior vertex contributes \emph{two} faces --- two new $\{+1,-1\}$ degrees of freedom --- against only \emph{one} constraint, and the free dimension $(2k + n - 2) - k = k + n - 2$ \emph{grows} with depth. Going deeper is freedom-positive on balance: the boundary projection $\Phi(D)$ can only retain or enlarge its options, never drop below the interior-free value $2^{\,n-2}$. (Empirically $|\Phi(D)|$ does grow with $k$; e.g.\ on the $4$-cycle the central-apex wheel realises $5$ sequences against the fan's $4$.) The constraints relate only interior-incident faces and cannot collapse the $n-2$ degrees of freedom carried by the boundary-incident faces --- which is the content the lower bound must make precise. \end{remark} \begin{remark} \label{rem:floor-consequences} Two consequences. First, $\Phi(D)$ is a $\mathbb{Z}/3$ zonotope --- a projected cube, sign-closed but not a $\mathrm{GF}(3)$ subspace --- and at the floor it has size $2^{\,n-2}$ with affine hull of dimension $n-2$. Second, since the floor is exponential in the interface length $n$, a maximally-constraining child still offers $2^{\,n-2}$ outer options, so the gluing of Conjecture~\ref{conj:heawood-chain-pigeonhole} has the least slack at \emph{short} interfaces (e.g.\ $n = 4$ leaves $4$ options) and is easy at long ones; the difficulty of the programme is concentrated at short level cycles. \end{remark} \begin{thebibliography}{9} \bibitem{Heawood1898} P.~J.~Heawood, \emph{On the four-colour map theorem}, Quart. J.~Pure Appl. Math. \textbf{29} (1898), 270--285. \bibitem{bauerfeld-depth} E.~Bauerfeld, \emph{Plane Depth}, manuscript (math-research repository), 2026. \bibitem{bauerfeld-nested-tires} E.~Bauerfeld, \emph{Nested Tire Decompositions of Plane Triangulations}, manuscript (math-research repository), 2026. \bibitem{bauerfeld-medial-tires} E.~Bauerfeld, \emph{Medial Tire Decompositions of Plane Triangulations}, manuscript (math-research repository), 2026. \bibitem{bauerfeld-nested-tire-duals} E.~Bauerfeld, \emph{Coloring Nested Tire Dual Graphs}, manuscript (math-research repository), 2026. \end{thebibliography} \end{document}