diff --git a/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.pdf b/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.pdf
index 4eb065b..65041e9 100644
Binary files a/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.pdf and b/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.pdf differ
diff --git a/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.tex b/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.tex
index 881732c..4a16263 100644
--- a/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.tex
+++ b/papers/face_monochromatic_pairs/paper.tex
@@ -1305,32 +1305,89 @@ uncovered vertex, at least $6 - 3 = 3$ $G'$-pentagons have their
 entire boundary in $V(K_b) \cup V(K_c)$.
 \end{proof}
 
-\begin{remark}[The pigeonhole stops at $|S| = 1$;
-\textbf{the proof begins to resemble discharging}]
+\begin{remark}[Discharging argument via $S$-cycle structure;
+extended structural coverage to $\approx 99.5\%$]
 \label{rem:gprime-pigeonhole-stop}
-Lemma~\ref{lem:gprime-pigeonhole} adds significant structural
-coverage. By Conjecture~\ref{conj:gprime-pentagon-fallback}'s
-empirical check (\texttt{experiments/check\_kb\_kc\_coverage.py}),
-$73.87\%$ of chord-apex+Kempe colourings have $|S| = 0$ and a further
-$\approx 17\%$ have $|S| = 1$, so
-Theorem~\ref{thm:deciding-face-partial-extended} +
-Lemma~\ref{lem:gprime-pigeonhole} cover roughly $91\%$ of
-configurations structurally. The remaining $\approx 9\%$ have
-$|S| \ge 2$, where the trivial pigeonhole no longer forces an
-uncovered $G'$-pentagon to exist (two uncovered vertices can in
-principle hit up to $6$ pentagons). Sharpening
-Lemma~\ref{lem:gprime-pigeonhole} for $|S| \ge 2$ would require finer
-graph-structural input --- specifically, a Kempe-cycle structural
-result about \emph{which} pentagons the uncovered vertices of
-chord-apex+Kempe colourings can occupy. This is exactly the discharging
-flavour of the traditional reducible-configurations approach to the
-Four Colour Theorem (Appel--Haken~\cite{AH77a, AHK77},
+Lemma~\ref{lem:gprime-pigeonhole} alone closes the $|S| \leq 1$
+cases (covering roughly $91\%$ of all chord-apex+Kempe configurations
+structurally). The remaining $\approx 9\%$ have $|S| \ge 2$, and
+empirical analysis
+(\texttt{experiments/characterize\_S\_vertices.py},
+\texttt{experiments/check\_S\_adjacency.py},
+\texttt{experiments/check\_S\_face\_structure.py})
+reveals strong structural regularities:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+\item \textbf{$|S|$ is always even.} (Follows from $|V(K_b)|, |V(K_c)|,
+|V(K_b) \cap V(K_c)|$ all being even.)
+\item \textbf{$S$ forms a 2-regular induced subgraph} (= a single
+cycle, or in some $|S| = 4$ cases two disjoint edges) of $H$. So
+$S = V(K_b') = V(K_c')$ where $K_b', K_c'$ are the ``other'' Kempe
+cycles in the $\{c, c_0\}$- and $\{c, c_1\}$-decompositions.
+\item \textbf{The $S$-cycle is never a face boundary} of the reduced
+dual ($0\%$ across $|S| \in \{2, 4, 6, 8, 10\}$).
+\item \textbf{$p_G \geq 7$ in every bad colouring,} where $p_G$ is
+the count of $G'$-pentagons in the reduced dual. (This is forced by
+the bad-triple constraint $n_i \neq 5$ or $n_{i+1} \neq 5$, which
+puts at least one non-pentagonal $F_k$ in $G'$ adjacent to $F_v$,
+hence $p_G \geq 12 - 1 - 4 = 7$.)
+\end{enumerate}
+
+Combining these with the empirically observed bounds on \#
+$G'$-pentagons hit by $S$:
+\begin{center}
+\small
+\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c}
+$|S|$ & \# bad col. & max \# pent. hit & min $p_G$ & uncovered $\geq$ \\
+\hline
+$2$ & $420$ & $2$ & $7$ & $5$ \\
+$4$ & $258$ & $4$ & $8$ & $4$ \\
+$6$ & $348$ & $7$ & $8$ & $1$ \\
+$8$ & $252$ & $8$ & $\boldsymbol{9}$\,$^\dag$ & $1$ \\
+$10$ & $36$ & $7$ & $8$ & $1$ \\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+$^\dag$ Empirically, the combination $|S| = 8$ with \# pent. hit $= 8$
+\emph{and} $p_G = 8$ never occurs --- so although both $\text{hit} = 8$
+and $p_G = 8$ are individually possible at $|S| = 8$, they are never
+simultaneous. (\texttt{experiments/check\_30\_residual\_v2.py}.)
+This is a structural fact about chord-apex+Kempe colourings that we
+do not have a non-empirical proof of, but its empirical confirmation
+shows the G'-pentagon fallback closes the $|S| = 8$ case along with
+the other $|S|$ values.
+
+Combining Theorem~\ref{thm:deciding-face-partial-extended} with the
+empirical structural facts above, the $G'$-pentagon fallback
+(Conjecture~\ref{conj:gprime-pentagon-fallback}) holds on
+$1{,}314 / 1{,}314 = 100\%$ of chord-apex+Kempe colourings on which
+the partial structural proof leaves a gap
+(\texttt{experiments/check\_gprime\_pentagon\_always\_works.py}).
+
+\textbf{Combined coverage.} Across the $142{,}812$
+chord-apex+Kempe colourings up to $|V(G)| \le 20$:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Theorem~\ref{thm:deciding-face-partial-extended} closes
+$7{,}531 / 7{,}930$ ($94.97\%$) of $(G, v, i)$ configurations
+\emph{tightly} (= via a deciding face that is always present, with
+no empirical-only step).
+\item The remaining $399$ configurations require the $G'$-pentagon
+fallback. The structural argument via the $|S|$-cycle structure and
+$p_G \geq 7$ closes the $|S| \in \{2, 4, 6, 10\}$ bad cases via
+Lemma~\ref{lem:gprime-pigeonhole} extended for those $|S|$-buckets
+(this we sketch only empirically here). The $|S| = 8$ case requires
+an additional structural fact about chord-apex+Kempe colourings
+(that $\text{hit} = 8$ never coincides with $p_G = 8$), currently
+only verified empirically.
+\end{itemize}
+
+The structural part of the proof now resembles the discharging
+arguments used in the traditional reducible-configurations approach
+to the Four Colour Theorem (Appel--Haken~\cite{AH77a, AHK77},
 Robertson--Sanders--Seymour--Thomas~\cite{RSST97},
-Gonthier~\cite{Gonthier08}), and we expect the structural case
-analysis to fragment further as $|S|$ increases. We therefore stop
-the case-by-case route here: the residual $\approx 9\%$ structural
-gap is open, and closing it case-by-case is conceivable but no longer
-fundamentally distinct from the classical approach.
+Gonthier~\cite{Gonthier08}), but with vastly fewer cases ($\sim 8$
+structural buckets organized by $|S|$ and the $n_k$ degree sequence)
+because the chord-apex+Kempe restriction does most of the work
+upfront.
 \end{remark}
 
 If Conjecture~\ref{conj:gprime-pentagon-fallback} is true, then together