Add Heawood chain-pigeonhole programme to tire-dual paper

Define a +/-1 Heawood face-labelling of a tire, its induced boundary
Heawood sequences and restriction relation, and interface compatibility
(0<->0, +1<->-1 = vertex face-sum vanishes mod 3). State the Heawood
chain-pigeonhole conjecture and a tire route to the Four Colour Theorem,
parallel to the medial programme.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-17 00:45:03 -04:00
parent 851ca7fbed
commit 251c453437
4 changed files with 186 additions and 29 deletions
@@ -5,17 +5,30 @@
\citation{bauerfeld-nested-tires}
\citation{bauerfeld-nested-tires}
\citation{bauerfeld-nested-tires}
\citation{Heawood1898}
\citation{bauerfeld-medial-tires}
\citation{bauerfeld-nested-tires}
\citation{bauerfeld-nested-tires}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\tocsection {}{1}{Introduction}}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\tocsection {}{2}{Heawood restrictions on the tire dual}}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:heawood-restrictions}{{2}{2}}
\newlabel{def:heawood-labelling}{{2.1}{2}}
\newlabel{rem:no-interior-constraint}{{2.2}{2}}
\newlabel{def:boundary-sequences}{{2.3}{2}}
\newlabel{def:heawood-compatible}{{2.4}{2}}
\bibcite{Heawood1898}{1}
\bibcite{bauerfeld-depth}{2}
\bibcite{bauerfeld-nested-tires}{3}
\bibcite{bauerfeld-nested-tire-duals}{4}
\bibcite{bauerfeld-medial-tires}{4}
\bibcite{bauerfeld-nested-tire-duals}{5}
\newlabel{tocindent-1}{0pt}
\newlabel{tocindent0}{12.7778pt}
\newlabel{tocindent1}{17.77782pt}
\newlabel{tocindent2}{0pt}
\newlabel{tocindent3}{0pt}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\tocsection {}{1}{Introduction}}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\tocsection {}{2}{Heawood restrictions on the tire dual}}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{sec:heawood-restrictions}{{2}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\tocsection {}{}{References}}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\gdef \@abspage@last{1}
\newlabel{rem:compat-is-heawood}{{2.5}{3}}
\newlabel{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual}{{2.1}{3}}
\newlabel{conj:heawood-chain-pigeonhole}{{2.6}{3}}
\newlabel{conj:heawood-route-fct}{{2.7}{3}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\tocsection {}{}{References}}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\gdef \@abspage@last{3}
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2022.10.5) 17 JUN 2026 00:31
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2022.10.5) 17 JUN 2026 00:42
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
%&-line parsing enabled.
@@ -192,31 +192,35 @@ File: epstopdf-sys.cfg 2010/07/13 v1.3 Configuration of (r)epstopdf for TeX Liv
e
))
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
(./paper.aux) )
[2] [3] (./paper.aux) )
Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
2992 strings out of 478268
41657 string characters out of 5846347
336140 words of memory out of 5000000
21041 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
3002 strings out of 478268
41895 string characters out of 5846347
340223 words of memory out of 5000000
21051 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
475975 words of font info for 54 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000
1302 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
69i,5n,76p,242b,213s stack positions out of 10000i,1000n,20000p,200000b,200000s
</usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/
cm/cmbx10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c
m/cmbx8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/
cmcsc10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/
cmmi10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/c
mmi7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr
10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr7.
pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr8.pfb
></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy10.pfb>
69i,7n,76p,242b,278s stack positions out of 10000i,1000n,20000p,200000b,200000s
</usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/a
msfonts/cm/cmbx10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/am
sfonts/cm/cmbx8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsf
onts/cm/cmcsc10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsf
onts/cm/cmex10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfo
nts/cm/cmmi10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfon
ts/cm/cmmi5.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts
/cm/cmmi7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c
m/cmr10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/
cmr5.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr
7.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr8.p
fb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy10.pf
b></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy5.pfb>
</usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmsy7.pfb></
usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmti10.pfb></u
sr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmti8.pfb>
Output written on paper.pdf (1 page, 145461 bytes).
Output written on paper.pdf (3 pages, 210205 bytes).
PDF statistics:
68 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
40 compressed objects within 1 object stream
94 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
56 compressed objects within 1 object stream
0 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
1 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)
@@ -87,14 +87,149 @@ Throughout, $G = (V, E)$ is a plane maximal planar graph (a triangulation)
with a fixed planar embedding $\Pi_G$. We write $|V| = n$, so $|E| = 3n - 6$
and $G$ has $2n - 4$ triangular faces.
%% TODO: state the Heawood restriction this paper studies. The relevant
%% classical input is Heawood's face-sum identity \cite{Heawood1898}; the goal
%% here is to record what it forces on the dual of a (nested) tire graph.
The classical input is Heawood's face-sum identity \cite{Heawood1898}:
for any proper $3$-edge-colouring of a cubic plane graph $H$, assigning
each face of $H$ a number in $\{+1, -1\}$ can be done so that the labels
around every vertex of $H$ sum to $0 \pmod 3$. In the triangulation
$G$ dual to $H$ this becomes a $\{+1, -1\}$ labelling of the
\emph{faces} of $G$ whose incident-face sum at every vertex of $G$
vanishes mod $3$. Our aim is to record what this restriction forces
along the boundary cycles of a nested tire graph, and to formulate a
chain-pigeonhole programme in this Heawood labelling parallel to the
medial programme of \cite{bauerfeld-medial-tires}.
\section{Heawood restrictions on the tire dual}
\label{sec:heawood-restrictions}
%% TODO: main development.
We work inside a fixed nested tire decomposition $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ of
$G$ from a single-vertex level source $S$ \cite{bauerfeld-nested-tires},
and use the tire data $T = (B_{\mathrm{out}}, O, E_{\mathrm{ann}})$ with
annular faces $F_{\mathrm{ann}}$, outer boundary $B_{\mathrm{out}}$, and
inner boundary $B_{\mathrm{in}}$
(\cite[Definition~1.5]{bauerfeld-nested-tires}). Since $O$ is
outerplanar, every vertex of a tire lies on $B_{\mathrm{out}}$ or on the
inner-boundary walk $B_{\mathrm{in}}$; a tire has no interior vertices.
\begin{definition}[Heawood face-labelling of a tire]
\label{def:heawood-labelling}
A \emph{Heawood face-labelling} of a tire graph $T$ is a map
\[
\lambda : F_{\mathrm{ann}} \longrightarrow \{+1, -1\}
\]
assigning a sign to each annular face of $T$. For a vertex
$v \in V(T)$, write $F_{\mathrm{ann}}(v) \subseteq F_{\mathrm{ann}}$ for
the set of annular faces of $T$ incident to $v$, and define the
\emph{induced vertex value}
\[
\lambda^{\!*}(v) \;:=\; \sum_{f \in F_{\mathrm{ann}}(v)} \lambda(f)
\;\;\bmod 3 \;\in\; \{0, 1, -1\}.
\]
The value $\lambda^{\!*}(v)$ is the \emph{partial} face-sum at $v$ taken
over the annular faces of $T$ alone, not over all faces of $G$ incident
to $v$.
\end{definition}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem:no-interior-constraint}
Because a tire has no interior vertices, every annular face of $T$ is
incident to $B_{\mathrm{out}} \cup B_{\mathrm{in}}$, and a Heawood
face-labelling is subject to \emph{no} internal constraint: all
$2^{|F_{\mathrm{ann}}|}$ sign assignments are admissible. The Heawood
restriction is felt only on the two boundary cycles, through the induced
vertex values $\lambda^{\!*}$.
\end{remark}
\begin{definition}[Induced boundary sequences]
\label{def:boundary-sequences}
Let $\lambda$ be a Heawood face-labelling of $T$. Reading the vertices
of $B_{\mathrm{out}}$ in clockwise order $v_0, v_1, \dots, v_{p-1}$, the
\emph{outer Heawood sequence} of $(T, \lambda)$ is
\[
\sigma_{\mathrm{out}}(T, \lambda)
\;:=\; \bigl(\lambda^{\!*}(v_0), \dots, \lambda^{\!*}(v_{p-1})\bigr)
\;\in\; \{0, 1, -1\}^{p}.
\]
Reading the inner-boundary walk $B_{\mathrm{in}}$ in clockwise order
$w_0, \dots, w_{q-1}$ gives the \emph{inner Heawood sequence}
$\sigma_{\mathrm{in}}(T, \lambda) \in \{0, 1, -1\}^{q}$. The
\emph{Heawood restriction relation} of $T$ is the set
\[
R_T \;:=\; \bigl\{\,
\bigl(\sigma_{\mathrm{out}}(T, \lambda),\,
\sigma_{\mathrm{in}}(T, \lambda)\bigr)
\;:\; \lambda : F_{\mathrm{ann}} \to \{+1, -1\}
\,\bigr\}
\]
of all (outer, inner) sequence pairs realisable by a single
face-labelling, read up to rotation and the global sign-flip
$\lambda \mapsto -\lambda$ (equivalently
$\sigma \mapsto -\sigma$).
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Heawood compatibility across an interface]
\label{def:heawood-compatible}
Let $T$ be a tire and $T' \in \mathcal{T}(G, S)$ a child of $T$, so the
outer boundary cycle $B_{\mathrm{out}}^{(T')}$ coincides with a bounded
face of $O^{(T)}$; let $\gamma$ be this shared cycle, of length $L$, and
let $v$ range over its vertices. Heawood face-labellings $\lambda$ of
$T$ and $\lambda'$ of $T'$ are \emph{compatible along $\gamma$} if at
every shared vertex $v$,
\[
\lambda^{\!*}(v) + (\lambda')^{\!*}(v) \;\equiv\; 0 \pmod 3,
\]
i.e.\ $0$ is paired with $0$ and $+1$ with $-1$. Equivalently, the
inner Heawood sequence of $T$ on $\gamma$ is the pointwise negation
mod $3$ of the outer Heawood sequence of $T'$ on $\gamma$, after
reversing one of the two clockwise readings to account for the opposite
rotational senses in which $T$ and $T'$ traverse $\gamma$.
\end{definition}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem:compat-is-heawood}
Compatibility along $\gamma$ at $v$ is exactly the statement that the
full incident-face sum at $v$ --- over the parent's annular faces
together with the child's --- vanishes mod $3$:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual}
\sum_{f \ni v} \lambda(f) \;\equiv\; 0 \pmod 3
\qquad\text{for every vertex } v \in V(G).
\end{equation}
Since $\gamma$ carries all faces of $G$ incident to $v$ between the two
tires, a family of Heawood face-labellings that is pairwise compatible
along every interface of $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ assembles into a single
$\{+1,-1\}$ face-labelling of $G$ satisfying
\eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual} at every vertex, hence (by Tait) a
proper $4$-vertex-colouring of $G$.
\end{remark}
\begin{conjecture}[Heawood chain-pigeonhole principle]
\label{conj:heawood-chain-pigeonhole}
There is a function $N(k)$ such that the following holds. Let
\[
T_0 \supset T_1 \supset \cdots \supset T_{N(k)}
\]
be a nested chain of tires in $\mathcal{T}(G, S)$ whose shared interface
cycles have length at most $k$. Then two adjacent Heawood restriction
relations $R_{T_i}, R_{T_{i+1}}$ in the chain admit compatible
face-labellings along their shared interface
(Definition~\ref{def:heawood-compatible}), after rotation and global
sign-flip. Equivalently, the chain contains a local gluing step that
cannot be obstructed by disjoint Heawood boundary restrictions.
\end{conjecture}
\begin{conjecture}[Heawood tire route to the Four Colour Theorem]
\label{conj:heawood-route-fct}
For every plane triangulation $G$ and every level source $S$, the
Heawood restriction relations $\{R_T : T \in \mathcal{T}(G, S)\}$ admit
a selection of face-labellings that is compatible along every interface
of the tire tree. By Remark~\ref{rem:compat-is-heawood} this yields a
$\{+1,-1\}$ face-labelling of $G$ satisfying
\eqref{eq:heawood-face-sum-dual}, hence $G$ is properly
$4$-vertex-colourable.
\end{conjecture}
%% TODO: realisability of $R_T$ per tire; counting / pigeonhole bound
%% giving $N(k)$; orientation/reversal bookkeeping on $\gamma$.
\begin{thebibliography}{9}
@@ -113,6 +248,11 @@ E.~Bauerfeld,
\emph{Nested Tire Decompositions of Plane Triangulations},
manuscript (math-research repository), 2026.
\bibitem{bauerfeld-medial-tires}
E.~Bauerfeld,
\emph{Medial Tire Decompositions of Plane Triangulations},
manuscript (math-research repository), 2026.
\bibitem{bauerfeld-nested-tire-duals}
E.~Bauerfeld,
\emph{Coloring Nested Tire Dual Graphs},