coloring_nested_tire_graphs: redo second-link analysis for maximal planar

Previous version had loose formulas and overstated what second-link
length forces.  Replaced with cleaner version that:

- States the maximal-planar constraints explicitly
  (E = 3V-6, F = 2V-4, sum of deg = 6V-12).
- Notes the FORCED 12 degree-5 vertices when all degrees ∈ {5,6}.
- Gives the correct second-link length formula:
    L_2(v) = d + sum_{u in link(v)} (deg(u) - 5)
  Earlier version had this wrong.
- Concretely: pentakis dodecahedron has L_2 = 10 around every
  vertex, but its dual (Buckyball) STILL has 6-edge cyclic cuts
  arising from non-second-link constructions.

So second-link length being large doesn't prevent small non-facial
cyclic cuts via other separators.  The min cut size is not pinned
down by local link structure alone.

Bottom line unchanged: min non-facial cyclic cut for a min 4CT
counterexample could be 6, 7, 8, ... and Birkhoff alone doesn't
distinguish.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-27 00:25:26 -04:00
parent ee4233f066
commit 1403b124d3
4 changed files with 67 additions and 53 deletions
@@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Translating to primal cycles.}{1}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Translating to primal cycles.}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Is this realisable?}{2}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Is this realisable?}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{However:}{2}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{However:}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Next layer.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Forced $12$ degree-$5$ vertices.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Second-link length.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Second-link length does \emph {not} pin down min cyclic cut.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Conclusion of this section.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Relevance to the cut-tire framework.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Relevance to the cut-tire framework.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Yes, in principle.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Yes, in principle.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{What would force this?}{3}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{What would force this?}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{The framework adapts.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{The framework adapts.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Bottom line.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent } \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Bottom line.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
\gdef \@abspage@last{4} \gdef \@abspage@last{4}
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2022.10.5) 27 MAY 2026 00:22 This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2022.10.5) 27 MAY 2026 00:25
entering extended mode entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled. restricted \write18 enabled.
%&-line parsing enabled. %&-line parsing enabled.
@@ -265,33 +265,34 @@ File: umsb.fd 2013/01/14 v3.01 AMS symbols B
[4] [4]
(./even_separating_cycle.aux) ) (./even_separating_cycle.aux) )
Here is how much of TeX's memory you used: Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
3257 strings out of 478268 3259 strings out of 478268
48510 string characters out of 5846347 48537 string characters out of 5846347
348660 words of memory out of 5000000 347660 words of memory out of 5000000
21447 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000 21448 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
480899 words of font info for 73 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000 481258 words of font info for 74 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000
1141 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191 1141 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
55i,5n,62p,238b,198s stack positions out of 10000i,1000n,20000p,200000b,200000s 55i,5n,62p,238b,198s stack positions out of 10000i,1000n,20000p,200000b,200000s
{/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dv {/usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/enc/dv
ips/cm-super/cm-super-ts1.enc}</usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/p ips/cm-super/cm-super-ts1.enc}</usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/p
ublic/amsfonts/cm/cmbx10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/pu ublic/amsfonts/cm/cmbx10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/pu
blic/amsfonts/cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/pub blic/amsfonts/cm/cmbx12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/pub
lic/amsfonts/cm/cmex10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/publ lic/amsfonts/cm/cmbxti10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/pu
ic/amsfonts/cm/cmmi10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/publi blic/amsfonts/cm/cmex10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/pub
c/amsfonts/cm/cmmi12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public lic/amsfonts/cm/cmmi10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/publ
/amsfonts/cm/cmmi8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/a ic/amsfonts/cm/cmmi12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/publi
msfonts/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/ams c/amsfonts/cm/cmmi8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/
fonts/cm/cmr12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfo amsfonts/cm/cmr10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/am
nts/cm/cmr17.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfont sfonts/cm/cmr12.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsf
s/cm/cmr8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c onts/cm/cmr17.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfon
m/cmsy10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm ts/cm/cmr8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/
/cmsy8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/c cm/cmsy10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/c
mti10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/cm-super/sfrm1 m/cmsy8.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/
095.pfb> cmti10.pfb></usr/local/texlive/2022/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/cm-super/sfrm
Output written on even_separating_cycle.pdf (4 pages, 174458 bytes). 1095.pfb>
Output written on even_separating_cycle.pdf (4 pages, 185871 bytes).
PDF statistics: PDF statistics:
88 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607) 93 PDF objects out of 1000 (max. 8388607)
53 compressed objects within 1 object stream 56 compressed objects within 1 object stream
0 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000) 0 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
1 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000) 1 words of extra memory for PDF output out of 10000 (max. 10000000)
@@ -106,41 +106,51 @@ possible in principle.
examples (icosahedron's dual = dodecahedron, etc.) all have examples (icosahedron's dual = dodecahedron, etc.) all have
many even cuts of size $6$ as well as odd cuts. many even cuts of size $6$ as well as odd cuts.
\section*{A heuristic suggesting ``yes'' --- vertex links} \section*{What the maximal-planar constraint forces}
Every vertex $v$ in a planar triangulation $G$ has a \emph{link}: Maximal planar (= triangulation) gives strong constraints:
the cycle formed by its neighbours. By Birkhoff, this link is a $E = 3V - 6$, $F = 2V - 4$, $\sum \deg = 6V - 12$. Average degree
$5$-cycle isolating $v$. In $G^*$, this corresponds to a approaches $6$ from below. Internally $6$-connected forces min
$5$-edge cut isolating a single triangle face of $G^*$ (= one degree $\ge 5$.
vertex of $G$).
\paragraph{Next layer.} Consider the ``second link'' of $v$: the \paragraph{Forced $12$ degree-$5$ vertices.} If all degrees are in
set of vertices at $G$-distance exactly $2$ from $v$. This forms $\{5, 6\}$:
a cycle around the link, of length depending on the degrees of \[
link vertices. 5 n_5 + 6 n_6 = 6V - 12, \quad n_5 + n_6 = V \implies n_5 = 12.
\]
So exactly $12$ degree-$5$ vertices, with the remaining $V - 12$
of degree $6$. For $V > 12$, at least some degree-$5$ vertex has a
degree-$6$ link neighbour.
If all link vertices have degree $5$ (= minimum for internally \paragraph{Second-link length.} For vertex $v$ of degree $d$ in a
$6$-connected): the link's $5$ vertices contribute $5 \cdot 5 = 25$ triangulation, the second link (cycle of vertices at distance
incidences, of which $5$ are to $v$ (the centre) and $2 \cdot 5 exactly $2$) has length
= 10$ are between link vertices (the $5$-cycle). The remaining \[
$25 - 5 - 10 = 10$ incidences go to second-link vertices. But the L_2(v) = d + \sum_{u \in \mathrm{link}(v)} (\deg u - 5).
$5$ link vertices share their second-link vertices in pairs (each \]
triangle face containing $v$, a link vertex, and a second-link (Each link vertex contributes one ``shared'' boundary vertex with
vertex), so the second link has $\le 5$ distinct vertices. each link-cycle neighbour, plus $\deg u - 5$ private boundary
vertices inside $u$'s fan.) For the icosahedron ($d = 5$, all
link degrees $5$): $L_2 = 5$.
Working through Euler more carefully: if all degrees are $\ge 5$ \paragraph{Second-link length does \emph{not} pin down min cyclic
and the link of $v$ has length $5$, the second link has length cut.} The pentakis dodecahedron ($V = 32$): every degree-$5$
exactly $5 \cdot (5 - 4) = 5$ (in the icosahedron, second link = vertex has all $5$ link vertices of degree $6$, so $L_2 = 5 + 5 =
link of antipodal vertex). But in larger triangulations 10$ around degree-$5$ vertices. Around degree-$6$ vertices,
(degrees of link vertices $\ge 5$, some higher), the second link $L_2 = 6 + 0 \cdot 2 + 1 \cdot 4 = 10$. So no second-link
is generically a cycle of length $\sum_{u \in \text{link}}(\deg(u) separator has length $6$.
- 4) = 5 + \sum_u(\deg u - 5) \ge 5$ with equality only when all
link degrees are exactly $5$ (icosahedron case).
So in larger internally $6$-connected triangulations, second-link \emph{But} the pentakis dodecahedron's dual (Buckminsterfullerene
length $\ge 6$, often equal to $6$, often even (especially in graph) \emph{does} have $6$-edge cyclic cuts --- they arise as
``vertex-transitive enough'' graphs). This is a heuristic for why separations \emph{not} surrounding a single vertex. So
$6$-cycle separators are abundant, but it's not a proof. second-link length is just one source of cyclic cuts; longer
constructions can yield smaller cuts.
\paragraph{Conclusion of this section.} The maximal-planar
constraint forces some structural relations but does not pin down
the minimum non-facial cyclic cut to any specific value. A
minimum $4$CT counterexample could in principle have any min cut
size $\ge 6$.
\section*{What I can conclude} \section*{What I can conclude}