\relax 
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Statement.}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Short answer.}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{lem:cut-parity}{{}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Translating to primal cycles.}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Is this realisable?}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{However:}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Forced $12$ degree-$5$ vertices.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Second-link length.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Second-link length does \emph  {not} pin down min cyclic cut.}{2}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Conclusion of this section.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Relevance to the cut-tire framework.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Yes, in principle.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{What would force this?}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{The framework adapts.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Bottom line.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
\gdef \@abspage@last{4}
