ebad90bfa9
Flip the forge-native-integration PRD from option 2 (agent calls the Gitea API directly via cred-proxy; done signal parsed from comments) to option 3 per issue #317 comment 2715: a forge sidecar backed by a Forge abstract class. - signal_done(status, summary) replaces comment-parsing as the done signal - semantic audit trail from the sidecar feeds provenance directly - read-anywhere / write-scoped enforcement, tighter than repo-wide API keys - forge-agnostic agent prompts and sidecar protocol - DeployKeyProvisioner subsumption deferred; share the HTTP client only Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WL77TgFxKbs3cidGMG9dz7
Docs
How this project records what it builds and why — and a guide to picking the right document for what you're capturing.
When to write which document
| Artifact | For |
|---|---|
PRD (docs/prds/) |
A feature: what to build, scope, success criteria. |
Research note (docs/research/) |
A landscape/tradeoff investigation. |
Decision record (docs/decisions/) |
A decision that isn't itself a feature — a policy, a convention, a "we will / won't do this," or a load-bearing choice made inside a larger PRD that deserves to be discoverable on its own. |
A decision that's fully specified by a PRD doesn't need duplicating in a decision record. Write one when the decision would otherwise be buried in prose, lost in an issue thread, or have no in-repo home at all (small requests that don't merit a PRD; non-feature choices like merge strategy or a trust posture).