didericis
d415581adc
`test` chains up -> run -> status -> down, which is the loop you actually want when verifying a clean install. Three things make it more than a convenience wrapper: * It refuses to start against an existing account. A reused home is not a clean install, so testing one silently would defeat the harness. * It tears the account down from an EXIT/INT trap armed the moment the account exists, so a failed run — or a Ctrl-C mid-install — still leaves the machine clean. BB_TEST_KEEP=1 opts out to poke at a failure. * Its verdict is stricter than the installer's. install.sh exits 0 when it finishes but `doctor` reports unmet prerequisites, so "the installer succeeded" is not a useful assertion; `test` fails if the install fails, if bot-bottle never reached the new user's PATH, or if doctor is unhappy. That meant giving cmd_status a real exit status instead of swallowing doctor's. Also fixes two bugs in `run`'s installer staging, by removing the staging entirely and feeding install.sh in on stdin: * `mktemp /tmp/bb-install.XXXXXX.sh` did not do what it looks like. BSD mktemp only substitutes trailing Xs, so every run wrote the *same* predictable path, as root, mode 644, in a world-writable directory. * The cleanup only ran on the normal and failure returns, so an interrupted run leaked the file. Piping on stdin sidesteps both: root opens the redirect before sudo drops privileges, so the mode-700 home that motivated the staging is a non-issue, there is no file to leak, and `sh -s` matches the documented `curl … | sh` shape more closely than executing a staged copy did. The command-level `exit 1`s become `return 1` so the steps compose under the trap, and the "next, run this" hints are suppressed inside `test`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
Docs
How this project records what it builds and why — and a guide to picking the right document for what you're capturing.
When to write which document
| Artifact | For |
|---|---|
Design workflow (docs/design-workflow.md) |
How discussion becomes canonical design, how dependencies are recorded, and when implementation may begin. |
Glossary (docs/glossary.md) |
Canonical term definitions — what words mean in this project. |
PRD (docs/prds/) |
A feature: what to build, scope, success criteria. |
Research note (docs/research/) |
A landscape/tradeoff investigation. |
Decision record (docs/decisions/) |
A decision that isn't itself a feature — a policy, a convention, a "we will / won't do this," or a load-bearing choice made inside a larger PRD that deserves to be discoverable on its own. |
A decision that's fully specified by a PRD doesn't need duplicating in a decision record. Write one when the decision would otherwise be buried in prose, lost in an issue thread, or have no in-repo home at all (small requests that don't merit a PRD; non-feature choices like merge strategy or a trust posture).