didericis-claude
bcdffc8400
Each AgentProvider now owns its skills / prompt / provision / supervise_mcp end-to-end. The base ABC declares all four as abstract; ClaudeAgentProvider and CodexAgentProvider each carry their own copy loop. Per PR review feedback (review #128): the shared _provision_apply.py abstraction was weak — Claude and Codex harnesses already diverge (codex's dummy-auth + login-status verify has no claude analogue) and forcing both onto one helper just postpones the split. Duplication is intentional. Deletes bot_bottle/_provision_apply.py and consolidates testing under tests/unit/test_contrib_{claude,codex}_provider.py (one file per provider, covering all four methods).
Docs
How this project records what it builds and why — and a guide to picking the right document for what you're capturing.
When to write which document
| Artifact | For |
|---|---|
PRD (docs/prds/) |
A feature: what to build, scope, success criteria. |
Research note (docs/research/) |
A landscape/tradeoff investigation. |
Decision record (docs/decisions/) |
A decision that isn't itself a feature — a policy, a convention, a "we will / won't do this," or a load-bearing choice made inside a larger PRD that deserves to be discoverable on its own. |
A decision that's fully specified by a PRD doesn't need duplicating in a decision record. Write one when the decision would otherwise be buried in prose, lost in an issue thread, or have no in-repo home at all (small requests that don't merit a PRD; non-feature choices like merge strategy or a trust posture).