cd9f023f3d
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 11s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 59s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
test / coverage (push) Successful in 21s
test / image-input-builds (push) Successful in 44s
test / image-input-builds (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
test / unit (push) Successful in 57s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 20s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 1m3s
Update Quality Badges / update-badges (push) Successful in 1m12s
test / integration-docker (push) Successful in 1m0s
`doctor` told users to run `./cli.py backend setup`. cli.py is a four-line wrapper at the repo root that calls bot_bottle.cli:main, and it does not ship — [tool.setuptools.packages.find] includes only bot_bottle*, so anyone who installed rather than cloned has no such file. Confirmed against a real install: the user's tree contains exactly one executable, `bot-bottle`, and no cli.py anywhere, while doctor recommended `./cli.py` three times. Invisible in development, where ./cli.py works fine from a checkout, which is why only a clean-install test surfaced it. The two entry points are the same code, so the fix is to name the one that always exists. 141 replacements across 45 files: the runtime messages that caused this, plus README, docs, PRDs, research notes and test prose, so nothing teaches the invocation a user cannot run. scripts/demo.sh is deliberately untouched — it *executes* ./cli.py from a checkout, where that is the correct and available path. Verified end to end: a sandbox install now reports "Run: bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker", and bot-bottle is on that user's PATH. Unit suite unchanged against the pre-existing baseline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
61 lines
1.9 KiB
Python
61 lines
1.9 KiB
Python
"""resume: re-launch a bottle by its identity.
|
|
|
|
Reads ~/.bot-bottle/state/<identity>/metadata.json to recover the
|
|
(agent_name, cwd, copy_cwd) the bottle was originally started with,
|
|
then runs the same launch core as `start` — but pinned to the
|
|
recorded identity so the new bottle picks up any per-bottle Dockerfile
|
|
override and transcript snapshot under the same state dir.
|
|
|
|
Use case: an interrupted or preserved bottle needs to be relaunched;
|
|
the operator runs
|
|
bot-bottle resume <identity>
|
|
to bring up the replacement from the recorded state.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import argparse
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
from ...backend import BottleSpec
|
|
from ...bottle_state import read_metadata
|
|
from ...log import die
|
|
from ...manifest import ManifestIndex
|
|
from ..constants import PROG
|
|
from .start import _launch_bottle
|
|
|
|
|
|
def cmd_resume(argv: list[str]) -> int:
|
|
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(prog=f"{PROG} resume", add_help=True)
|
|
parser.add_argument("--dry-run", action="store_true")
|
|
parser.add_argument(
|
|
"identity",
|
|
help="bottle identity from a prior `start` (see its session-end output)",
|
|
)
|
|
args = parser.parse_args(argv)
|
|
|
|
metadata = read_metadata(args.identity)
|
|
if metadata is None:
|
|
die(
|
|
f"no state recorded for identity {args.identity!r}; "
|
|
f"check ~/.bot-bottle/state/ or run `cli.py start` to create a new bottle"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
manifest = ManifestIndex.resolve(os.getcwd())
|
|
manifest.require_agent(metadata.agent_name)
|
|
|
|
spec = BottleSpec(
|
|
manifest=manifest,
|
|
agent_name=metadata.agent_name,
|
|
copy_cwd=metadata.copy_cwd,
|
|
user_cwd=metadata.cwd or os.getcwd(),
|
|
identity=metadata.identity,
|
|
bottle_names=tuple(metadata.bottle_names),
|
|
)
|
|
backend_name = metadata.backend or None
|
|
return _launch_bottle(
|
|
spec,
|
|
dry_run=args.dry_run,
|
|
backend_name=backend_name,
|
|
)
|