didericis
632ab002ed
Adopt ADR 0004: stop chasing a single global coverage number and measure what matters instead. - Omit the genuinely-interactive `cli/init.py` shell (read_tty_line prompt loops) alongside the existing `cli/tui.py`, with a rationale comment in .coveragerc. Subprocess/backend orchestration is NOT omitted — it stays visible and is scored via the integration suite. - scripts/coverage.sh runs unit + integration under one coverage measurement (the policy's yardstick) and can report the critical security/logic core held to the >=90% target. - scripts/diff_coverage.py is a stdlib-only gate (no diff-cover dep): new/changed executable lines must be >=90% covered. This is the enforced regression guard; the global number is informational. - CI gains a `coverage` job: combined report + the diff-coverage gate. - Unit-test `cli/__init__.py` dispatch/exit-code mapping (it's logic, not I/O, so it earns tests rather than an omit). Combined unit+integration coverage now reports 83% global / 87% across the critical modules; per-module ratcheting toward 90% is the ongoing work this policy frames. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NkwFXLFff9PYPy4wgVBJp9
Docs
How this project records what it builds and why — and a guide to picking the right document for what you're capturing.
When to write which document
| Artifact | For |
|---|---|
PRD (docs/prds/) |
A feature: what to build, scope, success criteria. |
Research note (docs/research/) |
A landscape/tradeoff investigation. |
Decision record (docs/decisions/) |
A decision that isn't itself a feature — a policy, a convention, a "we will / won't do this," or a load-bearing choice made inside a larger PRD that deserves to be discoverable on its own. |
A decision that's fully specified by a PRD doesn't need duplicating in a decision record. Write one when the decision would otherwise be buried in prose, lost in an issue thread, or have no in-repo home at all (small requests that don't merit a PRD; non-feature choices like merge strategy or a trust posture).