5e8ca21669
The project started life as bash scripts and got rewritten to Python (documented in docs/research/bash-vs-python-vs-go.md). Several docs still carried the old "bash-first" framing — misleading for anyone reading them now (8.7k lines of Python vs. ~130 lines of bash, all in scripts/demo*.sh). - CLAUDE.md "What this is" + "Conventions": orchestrator is Python, posture is stdlib-first. - docs/prds/0010-cred-proxy.md, docs/research/manifest-format-and- grouping.md: quoted CLAUDE.md's old wording — re-quote. - docs/research/built-in-supervisor-design.md, landscape-containerized- claude.md, agent-sandbox-landscape.md, pipelock-assessment.md, network-egress-guard.md: drop "bash-first" claims about the project, keep accurate descriptions of external tools' bash usage. Leaves untouched: bash code-fence syntax in examples, README's literal `bash scripts/demo.sh` invocation (the demo IS bash), Claude Code's "Bash tool" references, IVIJL/devbox bash description (that project actually is bash), and the bash-vs-python-vs-go research note that records the rewrite decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>