Files
bot-bottle/docs/research
didericis 90d6104e17
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 5s
test / image-input-builds (pull_request) Successful in 38s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 44s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 4s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 53s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 58s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 18s
fix(install): install into a private venv when pipx is absent
The harness's second run hit the wall the first one predicted: a fresh account
has no pipx, so install.sh fell to `pip install --user`, and every Python a Mac
offers — Homebrew and python.org alike — is externally managed, so PEP 668
blocked it. That fallback was never a fallback on macOS; it was a dead end that
printed instructions.

Replace it with a venv at ~/.bot-bottle/venv (BOT_BOTTLE_VENV to move it),
with the console script symlinked into ~/.local/bin. PEP 668 does not apply
inside a venv, and venv is stdlib, so unlike pipx there is nothing to bootstrap
first. pipx stays the preferred path when present, so anyone already managing
their Python apps that way is unaffected — and the post-install PATH check now
asks pipx for PIPX_BIN_DIR instead of assuming ~/.local/bin.

Keeping the venv under ~/.bot-bottle rather than ~/.local/share means the whole
footprint stays in one directory, which is what lets the throwaway-account
teardown remain a complete reset.

This removes the PEP 668 pre-flight and the sysconfig user-scheme lookup, both
of which existed only to serve the --user path. Their tests go with them:

* `detects_externally_managed_python` asserted the check that is now moot;
  replaced by one asserting pipx is still preferred when present.
* `checks_pip_usable_before_fallback` pinned a pip probe that no longer runs;
  replaced by one asserting the venv's own pip does the install, since using
  the base interpreter's would install outside the venv.
* `resolves_user_scripts_dir_not_hardcoded` and
  `macos_user_scheme_is_not_dot_local_bin` guarded the ~/Library/Python
  scripts-dir lookup. Nothing installs there now. The surviving "don't
  hardcode" concern is pipx's bin dir, which has its own test.

Five tests are added for the new path: the venv fallback exists, no --user path
survives, the venv is under the config dir, venv creation failure names
python3-venv (Debian ships it separately), and the entry point is exposed
outside the venv.

Verified end to end in a sandbox HOME with a fresh-account PATH and no pipx:
venv built, package installed, symlink created, `doctor` reached and green
(python 3.14.5, macos-container ready), exit 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
2026-07-27 01:10:06 -04:00
..
2026-05-07 22:45:36 -04:00

Research notes

Investigations into a question or a design space — landscape surveys, tradeoff analyses, "should we do X or Y," assessments of an approach before (or instead of) committing it to a PRD. A research note is where the thinking lives; a PRD is where a decided feature lives, and a decision record is where a settled choice lives (see ../README.md for picking between them).

Notes are opinionated. They reach a conclusion rather than dumping a neutral survey — the point is to move a decision forward and leave a durable record of why it went the way it did.

Naming

kebab-case-topic.md, named by subject and not numbered (unlike PRDs and decision records). Pick a name that says what was investigated: bash-vs-python-vs-go.md, pipelock-assessment.md, issue-tracking-vs-in-repo-decision-history.md.

Shape (freeform)

There's no fixed template — use whatever structure fits the question. In practice most notes share a loose shape:

  • Open with the question — a sentence or two on what's being investigated and why it came up.
  • Lead with the verdict — a ## Summary near the top stating the conclusion, so a reader gets the answer without reading the whole thing.
  • Then the analysis — whatever the argument needs: comparison tables, per-option sections, failure-mode walkthroughs, the axes that actually matter.
  • End with a recommendation when the note exists to drive a decision.

Keep the reasoning self-contained and grounded: cite sources, link files and PRDs, and prefer concrete evidence from this repo over generic claims — a note should stand on its own without a chat log or a Gitea thread. When a note's recommendation gets acted on, capture the resulting decision in a PRD or a decision record; the note stays as the "why we looked into it," not the system of record for the choice.