187d012ca8
Mechanical rename addressing review 6141 on #519: "consolidated launch" was unclear about what it composes. Rename the per-backend module `consolidated_launch.py` -> `infra_launch.py` and the error `ConsolidatedLaunchError` -> `InfraLaunchError` across all three backends and their callers/tests. Unify the three identical per-backend error classes into one `InfraLaunchError` defined in `backend/base.py` (re-exported by each `infra_launch`) so the base backend can raise and catch a single shared type — groundwork for the base owning the gateway-attach flow. Add a glossary entry defining **infra** = the per-host gateway + orchestrator service pair every bottle attaches to. No behavior change. Refs #516, #519. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Docs
How this project records what it builds and why — and a guide to picking the right document for what you're capturing.
When to write which document
| Artifact | For |
|---|---|
Design workflow (docs/design-workflow.md) |
How discussion becomes canonical design, how dependencies are recorded, and when implementation may begin. |
Glossary (docs/glossary.md) |
Canonical term definitions — what words mean in this project. |
PRD (docs/prds/) |
A feature: what to build, scope, success criteria. |
Research note (docs/research/) |
A landscape/tradeoff investigation. |
Decision record (docs/decisions/) |
A decision that isn't itself a feature — a policy, a convention, a "we will / won't do this," or a load-bearing choice made inside a larger PRD that deserves to be discoverable on its own. |
A decision that's fully specified by a PRD doesn't need duplicating in a decision record. Write one when the decision would otherwise be buried in prose, lost in an issue thread, or have no in-repo home at all (small requests that don't merit a PRD; non-feature choices like merge strategy or a trust posture).