Adds a research note on whether/how to scan for malicious code (not just
secrets) in commits pushed through the git-gate, and whether the semantic
(LLM) layer is a defensible paid feature.
Verdict: no scanner reliably detects malicious code (undecidable +
adversarial), so the frame is raise-cost + cover-the-obvious + human-gate
the dangerous. Ranked layers: dependency/supply-chain scanning (Socket/OSV/
GuardDog) > heuristic/obfuscation (Semgrep-on-diff) > risk-based human
gating via the existing supervise plane > best-effort LLM diff-review.
Fast scanners inline in the synchronous pre-receive; heavy analysis async.
Monetization: the paid unit is the governed git-egress review bundle
(managed semantic review + web-console human-review flow + RBAC + audit +
cross-run policy), not the raw scanner — which stays OSS like gitleaks.
Extends the egress audit+custody wedge to code artifacts; the supervise
console generalizes across all proposal types (egress, gitleaks, commit
review). Sell the workflow, not the detector's accuracy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YBCHap11yGAKuKfsehNPaD
Adds a "DX: run Claude yolo-style" row to the comparison table plus a note
framing developer experience as a differentiator. The field splits into
wrappers-around-the-agent (bot-bottle, agent-safehouse — one command, the
agent just runs, `--dangerously-skip-permissions` on by default with the
sandbox as the guardrail) vs libraries/services (boxlite, microsandbox,
CubeSandbox, E2B — you wire the agent in via SDK/cluster). agent-safehouse
is the only DX peer, but it's macOS-only Seatbelt with no egress story.
"As easy as native yolo, but actually sandboxed" is the defensible line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YBCHap11yGAKuKfsehNPaD
Adds a "Long-running posture" row to the comparison table and an addendum
note contrasting the two models: E2B and CubeSandbox are ephemeral-per-task
(5-min default timeout, tier-capped continuous runtime, duration via
pause/resume + reconnect-by-id), while bot-bottle bottles are persistent,
named, and supervised by default. For agents that run for hours/days this
posture difference matters more than the isolation primitive.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YBCHap11yGAKuKfsehNPaD
Adds CubeSandbox (Tencent Cloud, Apache 2.0, RustVMM/KVM microVM) to the
agent-sandbox landscape survey: per-project note, comparison-table column,
and a dated addendum on what it means for positioning. CubeSandbox is the
first surveyed project to bundle a connection-level egress allowlist +
audit + in-flight credential custody, but it does NOT do content DLP on
authorized channels — that plus the orchestration layer is where
bot-bottle stays distinctive.
Also corrects two stale self-descriptions the survey (2026-05-11) baked
in and I'd propagated:
- Default isolation is now a VM per bottle (Firecracker microVM on KVM
Linux, Apple Container on macOS); Docker is only the legacy fallback,
per _default_backend_name(). Was described as Docker-by-default.
- Outbound DLP is bot-bottle's own mitmproxy egress scanner + gitleaks on
git push, not pipelock (removed). All references updated; a note
records the change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YBCHap11yGAKuKfsehNPaD
2026-07-18 06:28:12 -04:00
2 changed files with 426 additions and 43 deletions
| Network policy | Default-deny via own egress scanner + per-bottle allowlist + content DLP + gitleaks on git push | Capability model only | Limited | Not addressed | Default-deny + allowlist + secret-injecting proxy | Default-deny + logging | Per-VM net (unverified) | Not documented | Off by default + allowlist | Default-deny allowlist + instant egress block + audit logs + per-sandbox tokens (eBPF) + credential vault |
| Parallel agents | Yes (one bottle per agent) | n/a | Not addressed | One at a time | Multiple VMs | Yes (dashboard) | SDK-level | SDK-level | Architectural | Yes (2,000+/host claimed) |
| Long-running posture | Persistent by default (named, supervised) | n/a (demo) | Session (up while in use) | Per-invocation | Ephemeral VM per run | Per-run (versioned) | Ephemeral + snapshot/fork | Ephemeral / on-demand | Named persistent by default | Ephemeral + auto pause/resume |
| DX: run Claude yolo-style | One command → interactive yolo Claude (`start <agent>`, `--dangerously-skip-permissions` default) | n/a (lib demo) | Wizard + build, then run claude inside (Linux only) | One-command wrapper (`safehouse claude --dangerously-skip-permissions`) | CLI: run a cmd in a VM (not a Claude wrapper) | Hosted (`tilde exec`), not local-native | SDK code required (build the run yourself) | CLI/MCP: sandbox-as-a-tool for the agent, not a wrapper around it | SSH into a named machine, run claude there | Stand up a cluster + drive via E2B SDK |
- Threat framing: "3 reasons sandboxing won't secure your AI agent"
(youtube TsYDazwHJ6U); Embroidery, "In sandboxes we (shouldn't) trust."
- The authoritative monetization/positioning analysis (the open-core line,
the wedge, single-run-free/cross-run-paid) lives in the **separate
`bot-bottle-console` repo**, not this one — cited here from memory, not
linked.
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
didericis