fix(tests): resolve sleep from PATH so subprocess tests run on NixOS

NixOS doesn't populate /bin (no /bin/sleep), so the gateway-init
end-to-end tests that spawn a real `sleep` errored with
FileNotFoundError. Add tests/_bin.py with a PATH-resolved SLEEP
constant (falling back to /bin/sleep on FHS hosts) and import it in
test_gateway_init.py instead of hardcoding the path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A9qa3xoavjQScufDfZaXKR

.gitea/workflows/lint.yml

@@ -24,8 +24,19 @@ jobs:
 
       - name: Run pylint
         run: |
-          # Run pylint on all Python files in the repo
+          # Pylint's normal exit code is nonzero for any emitted finding,
-          find . -name '*.py' -not -path './.venv/*' -not -path './.git/*' | xargs pylint --fail-under=8.0
+          # regardless of --fail-under. Preserve the full report but enforce
+          # the aggregate score this workflow promises.
+          set +e
+          find . -name '*.py' -not -path './.venv/*' -not -path './.git/*' \
+            | xargs pylint --fail-under=8.0 \
+            | tee /tmp/pylint-output.txt
+          set -e
+          SCORE=$(sed -n \
+            's/^Your code has been rated at \([-0-9.]*\)\/10.*/\1/p' \
+            /tmp/pylint-output.txt | tail -1)
+          test -n "$SCORE"
+          awk -v score="$SCORE" 'BEGIN { exit !(score >= 8.0) }'
 
       - name: Run pyright
         run: |

.gitea/workflows/tracker-policy-issues.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+name: tracker-policy-issues
+
+on:
+  issues:
+    types: [opened, unlabeled]
+
+jobs:
+  label-issue:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      issues: write
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - name: Ensure the issue has a label
+        env:
+          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+        run: python3 scripts/tracker_policy.py label-issue

.gitea/workflows/tracker-policy-pr.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+name: tracker-policy-pr
+
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronized, labeled, unlabeled]
+
+jobs:
+  check-pr:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    permissions:
+      issues: read
+      pull-requests: read
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - name: Require an unlabeled PR linked to an issue
+        env:
+          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+        run: python3 scripts/tracker_policy.py check-pr

README.md

@@ -171,6 +171,15 @@ When an outbound DLP detector matches a token, the route's `dlp.outbound_on_matc
 
 More examples in `examples/`. Full design lives under `docs/prds/`; the trust-boundary rationale is in `docs/prds/0011-per-file-md-manifest.md`.
 
+## Tracker policy
+
+Issues are the canonical work items and own all tracker labels; every issue
+must have at least one. Pull requests stay unlabeled and deliberately reference
+an issue with `Closes #…`, `Part of #…`, or another form defined in
+[`ADR 0005`](docs/decisions/0005-issues-own-tracker-metadata.md). Gitea Actions
+enforces the convention for new work from 2026-07-18 onward. Earlier closed
+PRs are grandfathered rather than given artificial retrospective issues.
+
 ## Trademarks
 
 bot-bottle is an independent project and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic, PBC. "Claude" and "Claude Code" are trademarks of Anthropic, PBC; the project name uses "claude" descriptively to indicate that the tool runs Claude Code inside a sandbox.

bot_bottle/cli/__init__.py

@@ -38,6 +38,13 @@ COMMANDS = {
     "supervise": cmd_supervise,
 }
 
+# Commands that manage host prerequisites (or are otherwise store-free) and
+# must run before — or without — a migrated DB. `backend` provisions/probes
+# the host (TAP pool, /dev/kvm, firecracker) and never opens the store, so
+# gating it on the schema breaks preflight on a fresh CI runner where stdin
+# isn't a TTY and the migration prompt can't be answered.
+NO_MIGRATION_COMMANDS = frozenset({"backend"})
+
 
 def usage() -> None:
     sys.stderr.write(f"usage: {PROG} <command> [args...]\n\n")
@@ -80,7 +87,7 @@ def main(argv: list[str] | None = None) -> int:
         usage()
         die(f"unknown command: {command}")
     mgr = StoreManager.instance()
-    if not mgr.is_migrated():
+    if command not in NO_MIGRATION_COMMANDS and not mgr.is_migrated():
         sys.stderr.write("bot-bottle: database schema is out of date\n")
         sys.stderr.write("Migrate now? [y/N] ")
         sys.stderr.flush()

bot_bottle/git_gate_render.py

@@ -419,18 +419,24 @@ PY
 while IFS=' ' read -r old new ref; do
   [ -z "$ref" ] && continue
   [ "$new" = "$zero" ] && continue
-  if [ "$old" = "$zero" ]; then
+  # Scan only the commits this push introduces — those reachable from
-    # New ref: scan only the commits this push introduces — those
+  # $new but not from any ref the gate already has. Everything already
-    # reachable from $new but not from any ref the gate already has.
+  # on the gate arrived via upstream mirror-fetch or a previously
-    # Everything already on the gate arrived via upstream mirror-fetch
+  # gitleaks-scanned push, so it's already-upstream or already-scanned;
-    # or a previously gitleaks-scanned push, so it's already-upstream
+  # re-scanning it only resurfaces historical fixture findings.
-    # or already-scanned; re-scanning it (the old `$new` full-ancestry
+  #
-    # range) only resurfaces historical findings and blocks every new
+  # Applies to both new refs and updates. The old existing-branch range
-    # branch. See PRD 0028 / issue #106.
+  # `$old..$new` walks commits reachable from the new tip but not the
-    log_opts="$new --not --all"
+  # *old branch tip*: on a rebase/force-push onto a freshly-advanced
-  else
+  # main that pulls in all of main's new history (incl. the deliberate
-    log_opts="$old..$new"
+  # sandbox-escape gitleaks fixtures), blocking the push. `--not --all`
-  fi
+  # excludes anything already on the gate regardless of ancestry, so it
+  # is also correct for non-fast-forward pushes (a rebase can skip
+  # commits off the direct path). Security-equivalent per PRD 0028's
+  # analysis: the bare repo's refs come only from trusted upstream
+  # mirror-fetch or gitleaks-gated pushes.
+  # See PRD 0028 (open question) / issues #106, #346.
+  log_opts="$new --not --all"
   echo "git-gate: gitleaks scanning $ref ($log_opts)" >&2
   if ! gitleaks git --log-opts="$log_opts" --no-banner --redact 1>&2; then
     echo "git-gate: gitleaks rejected push to $ref" >&2

bot_bottle/supervise.py

@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ from .supervise_types import (
     STATUS_MODIFIED,
     STATUS_REJECTED,
     TOOLS,
+    TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL,
     TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW,
     TOOL_EGRESS_BLOCK,
     TOOL_EGRESS_TOKEN_ALLOW,
@@ -263,6 +264,7 @@ __all__ = [
     "TOOLS",
     "EGRESS_FORWARD_PROXY",
     "EGRESS_INTROSPECT_URL",
+    "TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL",
     "TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW",
     "TOOL_EGRESS_BLOCK",
     "TOOL_GITLEAKS_ALLOW",

bot_bottle/supervise_server.py

@@ -2,14 +2,24 @@
 
 Per-bottle MCP server exposing tools the agent calls to propose egress
 config changes when stuck. The tools are `egress-allow`,
-`egress-block`, and `list-egress-routes`.
+`egress-block`, `list-egress-routes`, and `check-proposal`.
 
-Each queued tool call:
+Each queued proposal tool call:
 
   1. Validates the proposed file syntactically.
   2. Writes a Proposal to the host SQLite database.
-  3. Blocks polling for a matching Response row.
+  3. Blocks polling for a matching Response row, up to a short grace
-  4. Returns the operator's `{status, notes}` to the agent.
+     window (`SUPERVISE_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS`, default 30s).
+  4. On a decision within the window, returns the operator's
+     `{status, notes}`. On timeout, returns `status: pending` **with the
+     proposal id** and leaves the proposal queued — the flow is
+     non-blocking past the grace window (PRD prd-new / issue #412).
+
+`check-proposal` is the non-blocking companion: given a `proposal_id`
+returned by a `pending` response, it reports the current decision
+(`pending` | `approved` | `modified` | `rejected`) without re-proposing,
+so an approval made out-of-band (e.g. a web review console) can be resumed
+without holding an HTTP request open.
 
 One shared server fronts every bottle (PRD 0070) and attributes each
 proposal to the calling bottle by source IP, resolved from the orchestrator
@@ -22,7 +32,9 @@ Speaks MCP over HTTP+JSON-RPC. Methods handled:
   * `initialize`           — handshake; returns server info + caps.
   * `notifications/initialized` — ack-only.
   * `tools/list`           — returns the tool definitions.
-  * `tools/call`           — validates, queues, blocks, returns.
+  * `tools/call`           — validates, queues, waits out the grace
+                             window, returns (pending past it); or, for
+                             `check-proposal`, a non-blocking status poll.
 
 Everything else returns JSON-RPC error -32601 (method not found).
 
@@ -232,6 +244,31 @@ TOOL_DEFINITIONS: list[dict[str, object]] = [
         ),
         "inputSchema": _proposal_input_schema(),
     },
+    {
+        "name": _sv.TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL,
+        "description": (
+            "Poll a previously queued proposal for the operator's decision "
+            "WITHOUT blocking or re-proposing. Pass the `proposal_id` you "
+            "got back when an `egress-allow`/`egress-block` call returned "
+            "`status: pending`. Returns the current status: `pending` (no "
+            "decision yet — poll again later), `approved`, `modified`, "
+            "`rejected`, or `unknown` (no such queued proposal — wrong id, "
+            "or it was already resolved and read)."
+        ),
+        "inputSchema": {
+            "type": "object",
+            "properties": {
+                "proposal_id": {
+                    "type": "string",
+                    "description": (
+                        "The proposal id from a `pending` response."
+                    ),
+                },
+            },
+            "required": ["proposal_id"],
+            "additionalProperties": False,
+        },
+    },
 ]
 
 
@@ -353,7 +390,7 @@ def handle_tools_call(
             deadline=deadline,
         )
     except TimeoutError:
-        text = format_pending_response_text(config.response_timeout_seconds)
+        text = format_pending_response_text(proposal.id, config.response_timeout_seconds)
         return {
             "content": [{"type": "text", "text": text}],
             "isError": False,
@@ -370,6 +407,54 @@ def handle_tools_call(
     }
 
 
+def handle_check_proposal(
+    params: dict[str, object],
+    config: ServerConfig,
+) -> dict[str, object]:
+    """Non-blocking poll of a queued proposal's decision, by id.
+
+    Never creates a Proposal (so `check-proposal` isn't in `TOOLS`); it only
+    reads the queue. Resolution order mirrors the synchronous path's terminal
+    step — a decided proposal is archived here exactly as `handle_tools_call`
+    archives it after `wait_for_response`, so `pending` proposals stay visible
+    to the operator until they're both decided *and* polled."""
+    args_raw = params.get("arguments", {})
+    if not isinstance(args_raw, dict):
+        raise _RpcClientError(ERR_INVALID_PARAMS, "tools/call 'arguments' must be an object")
+    proposal_id = args_raw.get("proposal_id")
+    if not isinstance(proposal_id, str) or not proposal_id.strip():
+        raise _RpcClientError(
+            ERR_INVALID_PARAMS,
+            "check-proposal: 'proposal_id' is required and must be a non-empty string",
+        )
+    proposal_id = proposal_id.strip()
+
+    try:
+        response = _sv.read_response(config.bottle_slug, proposal_id)
+    except FileNotFoundError:
+        # No decision yet — distinguish "still queued" from "unknown id".
+        try:
+            _sv.read_proposal(config.bottle_slug, proposal_id)
+        except FileNotFoundError:
+            return {
+                "content": [{"type": "text", "text": format_unknown_proposal_text(proposal_id)}],
+                "isError": True,
+            }
+        return {
+            "content": [{"type": "text", "text": format_still_pending_text(proposal_id)}],
+            "isError": False,
+        }
+
+    try:
+        _sv.archive_proposal(config.bottle_slug, proposal_id)
+    except OSError as e:
+        raise _RpcInternalError(f"failed to archive proposal: {e}") from e
+    return {
+        "content": [{"type": "text", "text": format_response_text(response)}],
+        "isError": response.status == _sv.STATUS_REJECTED,
+    }
+
+
 def format_response_text(response: "_sv.Response") -> str:
     """Pretty-print a Response for the tool's text content. The agent
     reads the text and decides whether to retry / give up / surface."""
@@ -382,12 +467,35 @@ def format_response_text(response: "_sv.Response") -> str:
     return "\n".join(lines)
 
 
-def format_pending_response_text(timeout_seconds: float) -> str:
+def format_pending_response_text(proposal_id: str, timeout_seconds: float) -> str:
+    """Grace-window timeout: the proposal stays queued, and the agent is
+    told the id so it can `check-proposal` instead of re-proposing."""
     return "\n".join([
         "status: pending",
+        f"proposal_id: {proposal_id}",
         (
-            "notes: operator response timed out after "
+            f"notes: no operator decision within {timeout_seconds:g}s; the "
-            f"{timeout_seconds:g}s; proposal remains queued"
+            "proposal remains queued. Poll it (do not re-propose) by calling "
+            f"`check-proposal` with proposal_id={proposal_id!r}."
+        ),
+    ])
+
+
+def format_still_pending_text(proposal_id: str) -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "status: pending",
+        f"proposal_id: {proposal_id}",
+        "notes: still queued; no operator decision yet. Call `check-proposal` again later.",
+    ])
+
+
+def format_unknown_proposal_text(proposal_id: str) -> str:
+    return "\n".join([
+        "status: unknown",
+        f"proposal_id: {proposal_id}",
+        (
+            "notes: no queued proposal with this id for this bottle — the id "
+            "may be wrong, or the proposal was already resolved and read."
         ),
     ])
 
@@ -482,6 +590,11 @@ class MCPHandler(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
             # — silently dropping base routes like api.anthropic.com on approval.
             if req.params.get("name") == _sv.TOOL_LIST_EGRESS_ROUTES:
                 return self._resolved_routes_payload()
+            # `check-proposal` is a non-blocking read of the calling bottle's
+            # own queue — attributed by source IP like a proposal, but it
+            # never queues or blocks.
+            if req.params.get("name") == _sv.TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL:
+                return handle_check_proposal(req.params, self._attributed_config(config))
             # Attribute the proposal to the source-IP-resolved bottle, so the one
             # shared server queues each bottle's proposal under its own slug.
             return handle_tools_call(req.params, self._attributed_config(config))

bot_bottle/supervise_types.py

@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@ TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW = "egress-allow"
 TOOL_GITLEAKS_ALLOW = "gitleaks-allow"
 TOOL_EGRESS_TOKEN_ALLOW = "egress-token-allow"
 TOOL_LIST_EGRESS_ROUTES = "list-egress-routes"
+# Read-only agent tool: poll a queued proposal for the operator's decision
+# without blocking or re-proposing. It never becomes a `Proposal.tool` (no
+# queue record is created for it), so it is intentionally NOT in `TOOLS`.
+TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL = "check-proposal"
 TOOLS: tuple[str, ...] = (
     TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW,
     TOOL_EGRESS_BLOCK,
@@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ __all__ = [
     "TOOLS",
     "TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW",
     "TOOL_EGRESS_BLOCK",
+    "TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL",
     "TOOL_EGRESS_TOKEN_ALLOW",
     "TOOL_GITLEAKS_ALLOW",
     "TOOL_LIST_EGRESS_ROUTES",

docs/decisions/0005-issues-own-tracker-metadata.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# ADR 0005: Keep tracker metadata on issues
+
+- **Status:** Accepted
+- **Date:** 2026-07-18
+- **Deciders:** didericis
+
+## Context
+
+Gitea exposes labels on both issues and pull requests. Applying the same labels
+to both copies planning metadata, creates a synchronization obligation, and
+makes disagreements between the two records possible. At the same time,
+unlabelled objects look accidental unless the repository states which object
+owns the metadata.
+
+The repository already uses issues as work items and PRs as implementations of
+those work items. At this decision's cutoff, all open PRs reference issues, but
+121 of 219 historically merged PRs do not. Manufacturing retrospective issues
+for that history would create records that never participated in planning and
+would make the issue history less truthful.
+
+## Decision
+
+Issues are the canonical tracker records and own labels. Every issue has at
+least one label. An issue opened or left without labels receives
+`Status/Needs Triage` automatically until it is classified.
+
+Pull requests carry no labels. Every new PR deliberately references at least
+one existing issue in its title or description with one of these forms:
+
+- `Closes #123`, `Fixes #123`, or `Resolves #123` when merging completes it.
+- `Part of #123`, `Related to #123`, `Refs #123`, or `References #123` when it
+  contributes without completing it.
+
+Gitea Actions enforces both PR rules as a status check and repairs the empty
+issue-label state. Branch protection makes the PR policy check required.
+
+The policy applies from 2026-07-18 onward. Existing issues may be labelled as
+they are encountered, but closed PRs are grandfathered: no retrospective
+issues or PR labels are created solely to make history conform.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- Classification, priority, and workflow metadata have one source of truth.
+- A PR's issue link is the navigation path to its planning metadata.
+- Multi-PR issues do not require copied or synchronized labels.
+- `Status/Needs Triage` is an intentional fallback, not a final
+  classification.
+- Direct issue creation remains convenient; automation repairs a missing label
+  immediately after creation because Gitea has no native required-label rule.
+- The required check must be configured in branch protection after this
+  workflow lands.
+
+## Links
+
+- Issue #405.
+- `.gitea/workflows/tracker-policy.yml`.
+- `scripts/tracker_policy.py`.

docs/prds/prd-new-nonblocking-supervise.md

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+# PRD prd-new: Non-blocking supervise (async approval + proposal polling)
+
+- **Status:** Draft
+- **Author:** didericis
+- **Created:** 2026-07-18
+- **Issue:** #412
+
+## Summary
+
+The per-bottle supervise MCP server (`bot_bottle/supervise_server.py`)
+answers `tools/call` **synchronously**: it queues the agent's proposal and
+blocks the tool call polling for the operator's decision. On timeout it
+returns `status: pending` and leaves the proposal queued — but it hands the
+agent **no proposal id** and offers **no way to poll a specific pending
+proposal**, so the only way to learn the outcome is to re-propose (a
+duplicate).
+
+This PRD makes the MCP flow non-blocking and pollable, so an approval can
+happen out-of-band (a human taking minutes-to-hours in a review console)
+without holding an HTTP request open or wedging the agent:
+
+1. Include the `proposal_id` in the `pending` response.
+2. Add a `check-proposal` MCP tool: a non-blocking status lookup by
+   proposal id.
+3. Keep the short synchronous grace window for the common "operator is
+   right there" fast path.
+
+## Problem
+
+`handle_tools_call` → `_sv.wait_for_response(...)` blocks up to
+`SUPERVISE_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS` (default 30s). Two problems follow:
+
+- **Human latency ≠ tool-call latency.** A real review — rendered diff,
+  RBAC routing to an approver, someone tapping approve on their phone — is
+  minutes-to-hours. Holding the MCP request open that long is fragile
+  (proxy/keepalive timeouts, the mitmproxy egress hop, and the agent
+  harness's own tool-call timeout, which a long block can trip and stall
+  the whole turn).
+- **No resume path.** The pending fallback already exists, but without a
+  proposal id and a poll tool the agent can't reconnect to that specific
+  decision — it re-proposes, duplicating the queue entry.
+
+This is also the precondition for the planned web-console human-review
+flow (RBAC, audit retention, mobile) — see issue #412.
+
+**Safety note:** the MCP tools only *propose* policy changes; enforcement
+stays at the egress proxy and the git-gate. Returning early on `pending`
+therefore opens no hole — the agent still cannot egress or push anything
+unapproved.
+
+## Goals / success criteria
+
+- A `pending` MCP response carries the `proposal_id`.
+- An agent can call `check-proposal(proposal_id)` and get the current
+  state (`pending` | `approved` | `modified` | `rejected`) **without
+  blocking** and **without creating a new proposal**.
+- The synchronous fast path (operator approves within the grace window) is
+  unchanged: the first `tools/call` still returns the decision directly.
+- No change to enforcement, attribution (source-IP → bottle), or the
+  operator-side queue/response schema.
+
+## Non-goals
+
+- The git-gate `pre-receive` path (it is synchronous by nature and cannot
+  poll — its async variant is reject-fast + re-push; tracked as a
+  follow-up).
+- Backpressure / in-flight-proposal caps.
+- MCP server→client notifications (event-driven resume).
+- Any web-console UI (this PRD is the protocol groundwork it needs).
+
+## Design
+
+### `pending` response carries the id
+
+`handle_tools_call`'s timeout branch formats the pending text with the
+`proposal.id` and a pointer to `check-proposal`, so the agent knows what to
+poll.
+
+### `check-proposal` tool
+
+A new read-only MCP tool (`TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL = "check-proposal"`),
+attributed to the calling bottle by source IP exactly like the proposal
+tools. Input: `{ "proposal_id": string }`. Behavior:
+
+1. `read_response(slug, id)` →
+   - **found**: archive the proposal (same terminal step the synchronous
+     path takes) and return the decision via `format_response_text`;
+     `isError` iff rejected.
+2. **not found** → `read_proposal(slug, id)` →
+   - **found**: still queued → return `status: pending`.
+   - **not found**: unknown id, or already resolved-and-archived (e.g. a
+     second poll) → return `status: unknown`, `isError: true`.
+
+Both lookups already raise `FileNotFoundError` when absent
+(`queue_store.py`), so the handler needs no new store methods. `check-`
+`proposal` is the only path (besides the synchronous response) that
+archives, so a proposal that times out to `pending` stays visible to the
+operator until it is decided and then polled.
+
+### Grace window
+
+Left at the existing 30s default (`SUPERVISE_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS`),
+which doubles as the instant-approve fast path. Tuning it down is an
+operator setting, not a code change; noted for the console rollout.
+
+## Implementation chunks
+
+1. **(this PR)** `TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL` constant; `check-proposal` tool
+   definition + `handle_check_proposal`; dispatch wiring; `proposal_id` in
+   the pending text; unit tests. Files: `bot_bottle/supervise_types.py`,
+   `bot_bottle/supervise.py` (re-export), `bot_bottle/supervise_server.py`,
+   `tests/unit/test_supervise_server.py`.
+2. **(follow-up)** git-gate `pre-receive` reject-fast + re-push.
+3. **(follow-up)** per-bottle in-flight-proposal backpressure cap.
+4. **(follow-up)** MCP notifications for event-driven resume; web-console
+   review flow (RBAC, audit retention) on top.
+
+## Open questions
+
+- Should a resolved-but-unpolled proposal auto-archive after some TTL, or
+  only on poll? (Leaning: only on poll, so a decision is never lost to a
+  reaper before the agent sees it.)
+- Does the agent harness need an explicit "you have a pending proposal"
+  nudge, or is returning `pending` from the original call enough? (Deferred
+  to the notifications chunk.)

docs/research/agent-sandbox-landscape.md

@@ -6,27 +6,61 @@ general AI-agent sandbox / containment projects — some Claude-specific,
 some agent-agnostic, some hosted SaaS — and contrasts them with
 bot-bottle's design.
 
-Research conducted 2026-05-11.
+Research conducted 2026-05-11. CubeSandbox added 2026-07-18 (see its
+per-project note and the addendum at the end). Also updated 2026-07-18:
+bot-bottle no longer uses **pipelock** — outbound DLP is now bot-bottle's
+own (deliberately simple) egress scanner (a mitmproxy addon with custom
+detectors, PRD 0017 / 0053), and git-push secret scanning is handled by
+**gitleaks** in the git-gate. "pipelock" below has been replaced with the
+current mechanism; it survives only in older PRDs as history.
+
+Updated again 2026-07-18: six additional tools added (Cleanroom,
+container-use, Docker sbx, Anthropic srt, Microsoft AGT, Open Agent
+Passport); an **Agent-tailored policy** row added to the comparison table;
+a separate Governance layers section added for AGT and OAP. See the
+second addendum at the end.
 
 ## Summary
 
-Eight projects surveyed. None duplicate bot-bottle's combination of
+Fifteen projects surveyed across two categories: isolation/sandbox tools
-local Docker, declarative JSON manifest, per-agent egress allowlist via
+and governance/pre-action authorization layers (the latter don't provide
-pipelock, and bottle/agent split. Two clusters stand out:
+VM or container isolation but do per-agent policy enforcement at the
+tool-call level). None duplicate bot-bottle's combination of local
+VM-per-bottle isolation, a declarative per-role manifest, per-agent
+egress allowlist + outbound-content DLP, bottle/agent split, and the
+composable `extends:` policy model. Three clusters stand out:
 
 - **Closest neighbours** — agent-safehouse and litterbox: local,
   single-user, thin wrappers over an existing OS primitive
   (`sandbox-exec`, Podman + Landlock).
-- **Different category** — tilde.run (hosted SaaS), boxlite and
+- **Different category (isolation)** — tilde.run (hosted SaaS), boxlite
-  microsandbox (microVM libraries for platform builders), endo-familiar
+  and microsandbox (microVM libraries for platform builders), CubeSandbox
+  (self-hosted multi-tenant microVM service), endo-familiar
   (capability-security paradigm, no OS isolation).
+- **New: governance/pre-action layers** — Microsoft AGT and Open Agent
+  Passport (OAP): framework-embedded tool-call interceptors with
+  per-agent declarative policy. Closest competitors on agent-tailored
+  policy, but operate at the tool-call level rather than providing
+  network/filesystem isolation; they complement rather than substitute.
 
-The microVM cluster (matchlock, smolmachines, boxlite, microsandbox) is
+The microVM cluster (matchlock, smolmachines, boxlite, microsandbox,
-the most relevant for the v2 isolation discussion in
+CubeSandbox) is the most relevant for the v2 isolation discussion in
 [`stronger-isolation-alternatives.md`](stronger-isolation-alternatives.md):
 libkrun and Apple's Virtualization.framework have made local microVMs
-ergonomic enough that a `"runtime": "microvm"` option on a bottle is now
+ergonomic enough that microVMs are **now bot-bottle's default backend**
-plausible without a heavy stack.
+(Firecracker on KVM Linux, Apple Container on macOS), with Docker kept
+only as a legacy fallback for CI / hosts without KVM or Apple Container.
+That discussion has since shipped, not just been theorized.
+
+**The one that matters most for positioning is CubeSandbox** — it is the
+first surveyed project to ship bot-bottle's would-be wedge (default-deny
+egress allowlist + full audit logs + in-flight credential custody so keys
+never enter the sandbox) *combined with* per-sandbox microVM isolation,
+open-source under Apache 2.0, with Tencent Cloud behind it and 10.4k
+stars. It's a self-hosted multi-tenant service for platform builders, not
+a single-user declarative tool, so it doesn't collide head-on — but it
+narrows the "nobody else bundles egress custody + credential injection"
+claim that the monetization positioning leans on. See the addendum.
 
 ## Per-project notes
 
@@ -155,67 +189,272 @@ plausible without a heavy stack.
   also supported.
 - **Maturity**: Active through April 2026.
 
+### CubeSandbox *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: https://github.com/TencentCloud/CubeSandbox ;
+  HN launch https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47863430
+- **License**: Apache 2.0 (~10.4k stars). By Tencent Cloud; described as
+  "battle-tested, production-ready" infra already running in Tencent
+  Cloud. Rust / Go / C.
+- **Isolation**: MicroVMs via RustVMM + KVM — "each sandbox gets its own
+  Guest OS kernel, no Docker shared-kernel escapes." Hardware-level
+  isolation, dedicated kernel per instance.
+- **Locality**: Self-hosted, but **server/cluster-oriented**, not a
+  single-user local CLI. Deploy guides target PVM cloud VMs, bare metal,
+  and dev. A single 96-vCPU host is claimed to run 2,000+ concurrent
+  sandboxes.
+- **Agent integration**: **Drop-in E2B SDK replacement** (single env-var
+  change) — the headline compatibility claim. OpenClaw assistant
+  integration; general LLM-code execution. Aimed at platform builders,
+  not one developer's laptop.
+- **Config**: Programmatic via the E2B-compatible SDK. No declarative
+  manifest.
+- **Network policy**: This is the striking part — **domain allowlists,
+  instant block on unauthorized egress, full audit logs, per-sandbox
+  traffic tokens, policy-routing egress**, enforced by an eBPF-based
+  virtual switch giving kernel-level network isolation. Closest match yet
+  to bot-bottle's own default-deny + per-bottle allowlist egress model.
+- **Credentials**: **Credential vault** — agents call external APIs / LLMs
+  while "keys never enter the sandbox, model context, or logs." Same
+  in-flight-injection idea as matchlock, but productized as a vault.
+- **Performance**: <60ms cold start (claimed 2.5–50× faster than
+  alternatives), <5MB memory per instance; millisecond snapshot rollback
+  is upcoming.
+- **Maturity**: Open-sourced July 2026 off production Tencent Cloud use;
+  most-starred project in this set (~10.4k).
+
+### Cleanroom *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: https://github.com/buildkite/cleanroom
+- **License**: Apache 2.0
+- **Isolation**: MicroVM — Firecracker on Linux, Virtualization.framework
+  on macOS. Digest-pinned OCI images.
+- **Locality**: Self-hosted server (CI-oriented).
+- **Agent integration**: Generic process sandbox; CI-first, not a
+  Claude/agent wrapper.
+- **Config**: `cleanroom.yaml` in the repo being sandboxed defines egress
+  rules, resources, and network policy. Cleanroom resolves this from the
+  commit being run.
+- **Network policy**: Default-deny + per-repo hostname allowlist (resolved
+  from DNS answers + destination IP:port). Co-hosted services on the same
+  IP:port are not distinguished. OIDC-backed auth for remote servers.
+- **Credentials**: Host-side only; not injected in-flight but not present
+  in the VM.
+- **Notable**: Policy lives in the *repo being sandboxed*, not in an
+  agent-role definition — closer to per-repo scoping than per-role.
+  Supports Docker-inside-sandbox (`services.docker.required: true`), OIDC
+  authorization, suspend/resume lifecycle.
+- **Maturity**: Active Buildkite product.
+
+### container-use *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: https://github.com/dagger/container-use
+- **License**: Apache 2.0
+- **Isolation**: Docker container per agent + git worktree per agent.
+  Containers share the host kernel; stronger than bare host but weaker
+  than microVM.
+- **Locality**: Local.
+- **Agent integration**: MCP stdio server — Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf.
+  `claude mcp add container-use -- container-use stdio`.
+- **Config**: None for security policy. Environments are provisioned on
+  demand; no allowlist or credential config.
+- **Network policy**: Not addressed.
+- **Notable**: Per-agent git branches (`container-use/<env_name>`);
+  parallel agents without filesystem conflict; real-time log visibility
+  and terminal attach for intervention; git-based review workflow.
+  Oriented toward parallel development safety, not security containment.
+- **Maturity**: Early development, active.
+
+### Docker sbx *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: Docker proprietary (`sbx` CLI, separate from `docker`).
+- **License**: Proprietary.
+- **Isolation**: MicroVM (Docker's own implementation) — each session gets
+  its own kernel, Docker daemon inside the VM, and filesystem.
+- **Locality**: Local (macOS and Windows; does not require Docker Desktop).
+- **Agent integration**: Explicit wrapper — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini
+  CLI, Copilot CLI, Kiro. Launches agent inside the VM with
+  `--dangerously-skip-permissions` by default.
+- **Config**: Open / Balanced / Locked Down network presets at launch. No
+  per-role manifest.
+- **Network policy**: Default-deny; preset levels control strictness. TUI
+  dashboard shows a live log of every outbound connection (allowed and
+  blocked) with point-and-click allow/block for hosts.
+- **Credentials**: OS keychain + host-side proxy injection — API keys
+  never enter the VM.
+- **Notable**: Best DX among microVM tools (one command, works like native
+  yolo Claude but inside a VM); branch mode creates a git worktree in
+  `.sbx/`. Network policy is preset-based, not role-declarative.
+- **Maturity**: GA 2026.
+
+### Anthropic srt *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: https://github.com/anthropic-experimental/sandbox-runtime
+  (`@anthropic-ai/sandbox-runtime` on npm, `sandbox-runtime` on PyPI)
+- **License**: Apache 2.0 (experimental).
+- **Isolation**: OS-level only — Seatbelt (`sandbox-exec`) on macOS,
+  bubblewrap on Linux, WFP (Windows Filtering Platform) account-fenced on
+  Windows. **No container or VM.** Lowest overhead in the set.
+- **Locality**: Local.
+- **Agent integration**: Claude Code's sandboxed bash tool uses this
+  internally. Can wrap any arbitrary process (`srt <command>`). Cloud
+  Claude Code sessions use full microVMs instead.
+- **Config**: Programmatic per-invocation — allow/deny path lists for
+  filesystem; allow/denylist for network (HTTP proxy + SOCKS5).
+- **Network policy**: Proxy-based filtering (HTTP + SOCKS5); domain
+  allowlist/denylist enforced at proxy layer. Custom proxy supported
+  (e.g. mitmproxy for inspection + audit). Processes that ignore proxy
+  env vars may bypass filtering on some platforms.
+- **Notable**: Cross-platform (macOS/Linux/Windows); wraps any process,
+  not just agents; no role/manifest concept. Annotated as a research
+  preview — APIs may change.
+- **Maturity**: Early research preview.
+
+## Governance / pre-action authorization layers
+
+These two tools don't provide VM or filesystem isolation; they intercept
+tool calls before execution and evaluate them against a per-agent
+declarative policy. They are the closest competitors on **agent-tailored
+policy** and complement isolation sandboxes rather than substituting for
+them.
+
+### Microsoft Agent Governance Toolkit (AGT) *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: https://github.com/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit
+- **License**: MIT (~3.3k stars, open-sourced April 2, 2026).
+- **Isolation**: None (OS/VM). Execution rings (0–3, inspired by CPU
+  privilege levels) control what an agent can do at the framework layer.
+  MCP security gateway treats MCP traffic as an untrusted boundary.
+- **Locality**: Embedded in the agent framework (Python, TypeScript, .NET,
+  Rust, Go; 20+ framework adapters).
+- **Agent integration**: Framework-agnostic. Plugs into Semantic Kernel,
+  AutoGen, and others as a middleware layer.
+- **Config**: YAML policy per agent — tools can be `allowed`, `denied`,
+  `sandboxed`, or routed through an `approval` step. Every action passes
+  through a governance gate checking: agent DID, trust score, risk tier,
+  requested tool, action type, and policy rules.
+- **Network policy**: Not directly — operates at tool-call level.
+- **Credentials**: Per-agent DID (Ed25519 decentralized identifier); agent
+  does not borrow a human's credentials.
+- **Notable**: Dynamic trust score (0–1,000, behavioral decay) —
+  privilege follows observed behaviour, not just provisioning. Covers all
+  10 OWASP Agentic Top 10 risks. Kill switch + SLO monitoring. Sub-ms
+  policy enforcement.
+- **Maturity**: MIT, ~3.3k ⭐, v3.7.0 May 2026.
+
+### Open Agent Passport (OAP) *(added 2026-07-18)*
+- **Source**: https://github.com/aporthq/aport-spec ; spec at
+  https://api.aport.io/spec/spec/oap/oap-spec.md/ ; arXiv 2603.20953
+- **License**: Open specification.
+- **Isolation**: None. Pre-action hook only — intercepts tool calls
+  synchronously before execution, evaluates against a cloud-registry
+  declarative policy, fails closed.
+- **Locality**: Local hook + cloud policy registry.
+- **Agent integration**: Framework-agnostic; hook pattern.
+- **Config**: Declarative policy rules in a cloud registry (evaluated in
+  order; first failing rule denies). Ed25519-signed, hash-chained audit
+  records per decision.
+- **Network policy**: Not directly.
+- **Notable**: 53ms median authorization decision (N=1,000). In an
+  adversarial testbed ($5,000 bounty, 1,151 sessions), social engineering
+  succeeded 74.6% of the time under a permissive policy; under a
+  restrictive OAP policy, 0% success across 879 attempts. Assumes
+  framework runtime is not compromised.
+- **Maturity**: Specification + reference implementation, 2026.
+
 ## Comparison table
 
-| Axis | bot-bottle | endo-familiar | litterbox | agent-safehouse | matchlock | tilde.run | boxlite | microsandbox | smolmachines |
+*Isolation/sandbox tools only. AGT and OAP are governance layers — see their per-project notes above.*
-|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+
-| Isolation | Docker + internal net + pipelock; gVisor if present | Object-capability (no OS isolation) | Podman + opt. Landlock | macOS `sandbox-exec` | MicroVM (Firecracker / Virt.fw) | Hosted container (unverified) | MicroVM (KVM / Hypervisor.fw) | MicroVM (libkrun) | MicroVM (libkrun / KVM) |
+| Axis | bot-bottle | endo-familiar | litterbox | agent-safehouse | matchlock | tilde.run | boxlite | microsandbox | smolmachines | CubeSandbox | Cleanroom | container-use | Docker sbx | Anthropic srt |
-| Local vs hosted | Local | Local | Local (Linux) | Local (macOS) | Local | Hosted SaaS | Local | Local | Local |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-| Open source | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | MIT | No | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
+| Isolation | MicroVM per bottle default (Firecracker/KVM on Linux, Apple Container on macOS) + own egress DLP scanner; Docker legacy fallback, gVisor there if present | Object-capability (no OS isolation) | Podman + opt. Landlock | macOS `sandbox-exec` | MicroVM (Firecracker / Virt.fw) | Hosted container (unverified) | MicroVM (KVM / Hypervisor.fw) | MicroVM (libkrun) | MicroVM (libkrun / KVM) | MicroVM (RustVMM / KVM) | MicroVM (Firecracker / Virt.fw) | Docker container + git worktree | MicroVM (proprietary) | OS-level (Seatbelt / bubblewrap / WFP) — no container |
-| Agent target | Claude Code | Generic (demo) | Generic | Multi-agent wrapper | Generic (+ Claude/OpenAI SDKs) | Claude focus | Generic | Claude + Cursor (MCP/Skills) | Generic (AGENTS.md) |
+| Local vs hosted | Local | Local | Local (Linux) | Local (macOS) | Local | Hosted SaaS | Local | Local | Local | Self-hosted (server/cluster) | Self-hosted server | Local | Local | Local |
-| Network policy | Default-deny via pipelock + per-bottle allowlist + DLP | Capability model only | Limited | Not addressed | Default-deny + allowlist + secret-injecting proxy | Default-deny + logging | Per-VM net (unverified) | Not documented | Off by default + allowlist |
+| Open source | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | MIT | No | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 (experimental) |
-| Parallel agents | Yes (one bottle per agent) | n/a | Not addressed | One at a time | Multiple VMs | Yes (dashboard) | SDK-level | SDK-level | Architectural |
+| Agent target | Claude Code | Generic (demo) | Generic | Multi-agent wrapper | Generic (+ Claude/OpenAI SDKs) | Claude focus | Generic | Claude + Cursor (MCP/Skills) | Generic (AGENTS.md) | E2B-compatible (platform builders) | CI / generic process | Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf (MCP) | Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot, Kiro | Claude Code (and any process) |
-| Config | JSON manifest (bottles + agents) | Programmatic refs | CLI wizard | Profile files / shell fns | CLI / SDK | DSL + CLI + SDK | SDK | CLI / SDK / MCP | TOML Smolfile |
+| Network policy | Default-deny via own egress scanner + per-bottle allowlist + content DLP + gitleaks on git push | Capability model only | Limited | Not addressed | Default-deny + allowlist + secret-injecting proxy | Default-deny + logging | Per-VM net (unverified) | Not documented | Off by default + allowlist | Default-deny allowlist + instant egress block + audit logs + per-sandbox tokens (eBPF) + credential vault | Default-deny + per-repo host allowlist (cleanroom.yaml) | Not addressed | Default-deny; Open / Balanced / Locked Down presets; live TUI network panel | Proxy-based allowlist/denylist (HTTP + SOCKS5); custom proxy supported |
-| Maturity | Active May 2026 | Research (2022+) | Early (~66 ⭐) | Active (~1.4k ⭐) | Experimental (~574 ⭐) | Private preview | YC, ~4.7k ⭐ | YC, ~6k ⭐, beta | ~3.1k ⭐ |
+| Parallel agents | Yes (one bottle per agent) | n/a | Not addressed | One at a time | Multiple VMs | Yes (dashboard) | SDK-level | SDK-level | Architectural | Yes (2,000+/host claimed) | Yes (server model) | Yes (per-agent containers + worktrees) | Yes | Yes |
+| Long-running posture | Persistent by default (named, supervised) | n/a (demo) | Session (up while in use) | Per-invocation | Ephemeral VM per run | Per-run (versioned) | Ephemeral + snapshot/fork | Ephemeral / on-demand | Named persistent by default | Ephemeral + auto pause/resume | Per-run + suspend/resume | Per-agent container (ephemeral) | Per-session; branch mode creates git worktree in .sbx/ | Per-invocation |
+| DX: run Claude yolo-style | One command → interactive yolo Claude (`start <agent>`, `--dangerously-skip-permissions` default) | n/a (lib demo) | Wizard + build, then run claude inside (Linux only) | One-command wrapper (`safehouse claude --dangerously-skip-permissions`) | CLI: run a cmd in a VM (not a Claude wrapper) | Hosted (`tilde exec`), not local-native | SDK code required (build the run yourself) | CLI/MCP: sandbox-as-a-tool for the agent, not a wrapper around it | SSH into a named machine, run claude there | Stand up a cluster + drive via E2B SDK | CI-oriented, not a Claude wrapper | MCP server: `claude mcp add container-use -- container-use stdio` | One command: `sbx` wraps claude with `--dangerously-skip-permissions` default | Library/wrapper, not a standalone CLI |
+| Config | JSON manifest (bottles + agents) | Programmatic refs | CLI wizard | Profile files / shell fns | CLI / SDK | DSL + CLI + SDK | SDK | CLI / SDK / MCP | TOML Smolfile | E2B-compatible SDK | cleanroom.yaml in repo | None (no policy config) | Preset levels at launch | Programmatic per-invocation (allow/deny lists) |
+| Agent-tailored policy | Yes — bottle/agent split; declarative per-role egress + credentials; composable via `extends:` | Partial — capability model scopes per-agent, but no declarative role manifest | No | Partial — per-agent profile files (Seatbelt); no egress | No | Yes — per-agent DSL RBAC (allow/deny/approve per action/repo/agent) | No | No | No | No — per-sandbox SDK config, not role-scoped | Partial — per-repo cleanroom.yaml, not per-role | No | No — network presets only | No |
+| Maturity | Active July 2026 | Research (2022+) | Early (~66 ⭐) | Active (~1.4k ⭐) | Experimental (~574 ⭐) | Private preview | YC, ~4.7k ⭐ | YC, ~6k ⭐, beta | ~3.1k ⭐ | Tencent, prod, ~10.4k ⭐ | Active (Buildkite product) | Early development | GA 2026 | Early research preview |
 
 ## What's closest, what's different
 
 **Closest in design and scope.** agent-safehouse and litterbox sit
 nearest bot-bottle: local, single-user, thin wrappers over an
 existing OS primitive, low-dep. The split is the isolation primitive —
-bot-bottle uses Docker + pipelock egress (plus gVisor where
+bot-bottle now defaults to a VM per bottle (Firecracker microVM on KVM
-available); agent-safehouse uses `sandbox-exec`; litterbox uses Podman +
+Linux, Apple Container on macOS) with its own DLP-scanning egress proxy,
-Landlock. matchlock and smolmachines are spiritually close on the
+keeping Docker only as a legacy fallback; agent-safehouse uses
-*policy* side (default-deny net, per-host allowlist) but use microVMs
+`sandbox-exec`; litterbox uses Podman + Landlock. matchlock and
-instead of containers.
+smolmachines are close on *both* the policy side (default-deny net,
+per-host allowlist) and — now that bot-bottle has moved off
+containers-by-default — the microVM isolation primitive.
+
+**New closest on agent-tailored policy.** Two governance tools are the
+direct competitors on the "coarse-grained sandbox" axis. **tilde.run**
+has had per-agent DSL RBAC since its launch (though it's hosted SaaS).
+**Microsoft AGT** is the most serious new entrant: per-agent DID
+identity, YAML policy that can allow/deny/sandbox/approve individual tool
+calls per agent, and a dynamic behavioural trust score. It operates at
+the framework tool-call layer, not the network layer — so it's
+complementary to bot-bottle's network/filesystem isolation rather than a
+direct substitute, but on the "does this sandbox know what this agent is
+for?" question it is the most complete answer in the field. OAP's
+pre-action hook pattern achieves similar goals with cryptographic audit
+and a 0% adversarial-attack success rate under a restrictive policy.
+
+**New closest on DX.** **Docker sbx** is the first tool in this set that
+matches bot-bottle on the "one command, dangerously-skip-permissions safe
+by default" DX bar, at microVM isolation strength, with host-side
+credential injection. It is proprietary, preset-based (not role-
+declarative), and cloud-agent-specific, but it directly competes on the
+UX proposition. agent-safehouse was the previous DX peer; Docker sbx
+materially raises the bar.
+
+**New closest on repo-scoped policy.** **Cleanroom** (Buildkite) is the
+first tool to combine microVM isolation with a declarative egress policy
+file — though the policy lives in the repo being sandboxed
+(`cleanroom.yaml`), not in an agent-role manifest. That makes it per-
+repo rather than per-role: the same Cleanroom config applies to any
+agent running in that repo. The distinction matters for bot-bottle's
+use case (one developer running multiple agent *roles* with different
+egress footprints), but for CI/CD use cases Cleanroom is a direct
+alternative.
 
 **Solving a different problem.** tilde.run is hosted SaaS for team /
 production agent pipelines with data-versioned rollback — explicitly
-opposite to bot-bottle's "infrastructure I control" goal. boxlite and
+opposite to bot-bottle's "infrastructure I control" goal. boxlite,
-microsandbox are infrastructure libraries aimed at platform builders
+microsandbox, and CubeSandbox are infrastructure libraries/services aimed
-embedding sandboxes into agent frameworks; they would be a *backend*
+at platform builders embedding sandboxes into agent frameworks; they
-bot-bottle could call, not a competitor to its manifest layer.
+would be a *backend* bot-bottle could call, not a competitor to its
-endo-familiar is in a different paradigm entirely: capability passing
+manifest layer. endo-familiar is in a different paradigm entirely:
-rather than kernel boundaries.
+capability passing rather than kernel boundaries.
 
 ## Borrowable ideas
 
 What bot-bottle already has that the survey suggested as
 differentiators:
-- Default-deny egress with a per-agent allowlist (pipelock).
+- Default-deny egress with a per-agent allowlist (own egress scanner).
 - DLP scanning of outbound traffic.
 - Bottle / agent split (manifest layer above the isolation primitive).
 - gVisor auto-detection on Linux.
 
-Ideas worth considering, without abandoning the Python-stdlib-first / local-Docker
+Ideas worth considering, without abandoning the Python-stdlib-first /
-stance:
+local, single-operator stance:
 
 1. **Per-use SSH key confirmation** (from litterbox). Even with
-   KnownHostKey pinning and pipelock egress, a wrapper SSH agent that
+   KnownHostKey pinning and the egress DLP scanner, a wrapper SSH agent that
    prompts on each key use (e.g. via `osascript` / `notify-send`) would
    catch an agent doing something off-policy with a key it legitimately
    holds. Pure-stdlib, no new deps.
-2. **In-flight secret injection** (from matchlock). Pipelock already
+2. **In-flight secret injection** (from matchlock). The egress scanner
-   does egress allowlisting and DLP; teaching it to *inject* tokens at
+   already does allowlisting and DLP; teaching it to *inject* tokens at
    proxy time so e.g. `GITEA_TOKEN` never appears in the container's
    env would close the "agent reads its own env and exfiltrates" path.
-   Fits the existing pipelock architecture.
+   Fits the existing egress-proxy architecture.
-3. **MicroVM backend as an opt-in bottle type** — already on the radar
+3. **MicroVM backend** — ~~on the radar~~ **shipped since this survey.**
-   in `stronger-isolation-alternatives.md`. microsandbox, smolmachines,
+   microVMs are now bot-bottle's default (Firecracker on KVM Linux, Apple
-   and matchlock all show that libkrun + Apple's
+   Container on macOS); Docker is the legacy fallback. The libkrun / Apple
-   Virtualization.framework is ergonomic enough that a
+   Virtualization.framework ergonomics that microsandbox, smolmachines,
-   `"runtime": "microvm"` field on a bottle is plausible without a heavy
+   and matchlock demonstrated turned out to be enough to make it the
-   stack.
+   default rather than an opt-in.
 
 Not worth borrowing: the SDK-first programmatic API style of boxlite /
 microsandbox (cuts against the declarative-manifest stance), and the
@@ -230,3 +469,176 @@ hosted-SaaS dashboard model of tilde.run (cuts against the
 - The `superradcompany/microsandbox` URL in the original prompt
   redirects to `microsandbox/microsandbox`; the surveyed project is the
   same.
+- CubeSandbox performance/scale numbers (<60ms cold start, <5MB/instance,
+  2,000+ sandboxes per 96-vCPU host) are the project's own launch claims,
+  not independently verified here.
+
+## Addendum 2026-07-18 — CubeSandbox and the positioning read
+
+CubeSandbox (Tencent Cloud, Apache 2.0, ~10.4k stars, HN launch
+[#47863430](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47863430)) is the first
+project in this survey to combine, in one open-source stack, everything
+bot-bottle treated as its differentiator:
+
+- **Egress custody (connection level)** — default-deny domain allowlist
+  (L7 domain/SNI filtering), instant block on unauthorized egress,
+  per-sandbox traffic tokens, full audit logs of destinations (eBPF
+  virtual switch, "CubeVS"). This matches bot-bottle's egress scanner at
+  the *connection level*, productized — see the one thing it does **not**
+  match, below.
+- **Credential custody** — a vault where keys "never enter the sandbox,
+  model context, or logs." This is the in-flight-injection idea from
+  matchlock, but as a first-class feature, and it's exactly the
+  cross-vendor "egress audit + custody" wedge the monetization
+  positioning treats as the one defensible moat.
+- **Isolation on par with bot-bottle's current default** — a dedicated
+  guest kernel per sandbox (RustVMM/KVM). bot-bottle now defaults to the
+  same class of boundary (Firecracker microVM / Apple Container), so this
+  is parity, not an edge; CubeSandbox's remaining edge is running that
+  per-kernel isolation multi-tenant at scale on one host.
+
+The one axis CubeSandbox does **not** cover — and where bot-bottle stays
+distinctive:
+
+- **Content DLP on *authorized* channels.** CubeSandbox's egress control
+  is connection-level: it decides *whether* a destination is allowed and
+  logs it, and its vault keeps *injected* credentials out of the sandbox
+  entirely. Neither inspects the *payload* of traffic to an allowed
+  destination. So an agent that exfiltrates over a permitted channel —
+  pasting a repo's contents, an agent-derived secret, or PHI into an
+  allowed API/domain — is not caught by CubeSandbox. bot-bottle's own
+  egress DLP scanner does scan that: response + websocket content against
+  the resolved per-flow config, with per-bottle token redaction (see
+  recent egress commits). The vault
+  approach is arguably *stronger* for the specific case of pre-known
+  injected credentials (they can't leak if they were never present), but
+  it is not a substitute for content inspection of everything else.
+
+**Long-running posture — a sharper axis than raw isolation.** E2B and
+CubeSandbox are *ephemeral-per-task* by design; a long-running agent is an
+architected pattern on top, not the default. E2B: 5-minute default
+timeout, continuous runtime tier-capped (~1h Hobby / ~24h Pro), duration
+achieved via **pause/resume** (preserves filesystem + memory + processes;
+reconnect by sandbox ID via `Sandbox.connect()`; resume resets the timeout
+to 5 min; auto-pause via `on_timeout: "pause"`). CubeSandbox mirrors this
+(E2B drop-in) with first-class auto pause/resume and hundred-ms
+checkpoint/fork — and, self-hosted, sets its own timeout policy with no
+vendor tier caps. bot-bottle inverts the model: a bottle is **persistent,
+named, and supervised by default** — long-running *is* the default, not a
+session-management loop over pause/resume. smolmachines is the other
+persistent-by-default project in this set. For anyone building agents that
+run for hours/days, this posture difference matters more than the
+isolation primitive.
+
+**DX — the "run Claude yolo-style" bar.** The reason `claude
+--dangerously-skip-permissions` is so widely used is DX: it's one command
+and the agent just goes. The bottle thesis is to make a *sandboxed* run
+that easy — `start <agent>` builds the image on first run and drops you
+into an interactive Claude session that already has
+`--dangerously-skip-permissions` on by default
+(`contrib/claude/agent_provider.py`), with the sandbox as the guardrail
+instead of per-action prompts. On this axis the field splits cleanly:
+- **Wrappers around the agent** (as-easy-as-native): bot-bottle and
+  **agent-safehouse** (`safehouse claude --dangerously-skip-permissions`).
+  These *are* the run-Claude experience. agent-safehouse is the real DX
+  peer — but it's macOS-only Seatbelt, single-run, and doesn't address
+  network egress; bot-bottle adds VM-grade isolation, egress DLP, and
+  persistent/parallel bottles across macOS + Linux.
+- **Libraries / services** (you build the run yourself): boxlite,
+  microsandbox, CubeSandbox, E2B. These hand you an SDK or a cluster and
+  expect you to wire the agent in — powerful for platform builders,
+  heavyweight for "just run Claude on my laptop." microsandbox's MCP/Skills
+  angle is *sandbox-as-a-tool the agent calls*, which is the inverse of
+  wrapping the agent.
+- **In between:** litterbox (wizard + build, Linux only), smolmachines
+  (SSH into a named machine), matchlock (run a command in a VM).
+
+So DX is a genuine bot-bottle differentiator, and the only project that
+matches it (agent-safehouse) does so with materially weaker isolation and
+no egress story. "As easy as native yolo, but actually sandboxed" is a
+defensible one-liner.
+
+Why it still doesn't collide head-on:
+
+1. **Shape.** CubeSandbox is a *multi-tenant service for platform
+   builders* (drop-in E2B replacement, SDK-driven, 2,000 sandboxes on a
+   box). bot-bottle is a *single-operator, declarative-manifest tool for
+   the infrastructure I run*. Different buyer, different ergonomics — no
+   JSON manifest, no bottle/agent split, no "one command on my laptop."
+2. **Backend, not competitor.** Like boxlite/microsandbox, CubeSandbox is
+   something bot-bottle could sit *on top of* — a `"runtime": "microvm"`
+   or `"runtime": "cubesandbox"` backend under the manifest layer — while
+   keeping the manifest, the bottle/agent split, and the local,
+   single-operator default.
+
+Why it matters anyway:
+
+- The "nobody else bundles connection-level egress allowlist + audit +
+  in-flight credential custody" line is **no longer true for the
+  primitive** — a well-funded, 10k-star open-source project now ships it.
+  But **content DLP on authorized channels is still not matched** (see
+  above), and neither is the *layer above* the primitive (declarative
+  manifest, cross-vendor orchestration, operator UX, the
+  phone-control/dashboard north star). Those two — outbound-payload DLP
+  and the orchestration layer — are where the defensible ground now sits;
+  the connection-level allowlist + vault mechanism, on its own, is no
+  longer differentiating. Revisit the monetization open/paid line with
+  that in mind.
+- Worth a closer look at **how** CubeSandbox does credential injection
+  and per-sandbox egress tokens (eBPF virtual switch vs. bot-bottle's
+  mitmproxy egress proxy) before the next iteration of bot-bottle's
+  in-flight-secret feature — see borrowable idea #2 above.
+
+## Addendum 2026-07-18 (second pass) — agent-tailored policy landscape
+
+The second-pass question was: how novel is bot-bottle's per-agent,
+role-tailored sandbox relative to the expanded field?
+
+**The short answer:** on the isolation + network + role-tailoring
+combination, bot-bottle remains the only tool in this set. On
+role-tailored *policy at the tool-call level*, Microsoft AGT and OAP are
+the most complete answers, but they don't provide isolation; they
+complement rather than substitute.
+
+**The competitive picture by axis:**
+
+- *Agent-tailored egress (declarative, per-role)* — bot-bottle and
+  tilde.run. Cleanroom is per-repo, not per-role. Everyone else is
+  per-session or not addressed.
+- *Agent-tailored tool-call policy (declarative, per-agent identity)* —
+  Microsoft AGT (YAML policy + DID identity + trust score), OAP
+  (declarative policy rules + cryptographic audit). Neither provides
+  network/filesystem isolation.
+- *Composable policy (role overlays)* — bot-bottle (`extends:`). No
+  other tool surveyed supports composable role-policy inheritance.
+- *Isolation + DX (one-command safe yolo)* — bot-bottle and Docker sbx.
+  Docker sbx is proprietary, preset-based, and cloud-agent-specific;
+  it's the first DX-class competitor at microVM isolation strength.
+
+**What the HN "coarse-grained" complaint maps to:** The complaint is
+that a VM isolates the filesystem but doesn't know if the agent
+*should* be sending an email. bot-bottle's bottle/agent split is a
+structural answer to this: the bottle manifest declares exactly what
+the role can reach, and the sandbox enforces it at the network layer.
+Microsoft AGT is the most complete answer at the semantic/tool-call
+layer. The gap both leave open is *intent classification* — knowing
+whether a permitted action is consistent with the agent's actual task.
+See `hn-agent-safety-discourse-july-2026.md` for the blast-radius
+analysis.
+
+**Borrowable from new tools:**
+
+- **Microsoft AGT's trust-score decay** — privilege that reflects
+  observed behaviour rather than static provisioning. Applied to
+  bot-bottle: a bottle that has triggered DLP alerts or supervise holds
+  could auto-downgrade its network preset, or flag the session for
+  closer review. Fits the existing supervise-server architecture.
+- **Docker sbx's live network TUI** — real-time per-session view of
+  allowed and blocked outbound connections with point-and-click
+  allow/block. `cli.py supervise` is the right surface; adding a
+  live-connections panel would directly address the "I can't see what
+  the agent is doing" gap without any backend changes.
+- **OAP's cryptographic audit chain** — Ed25519-signed, hash-chained
+  audit records. Currently bot-bottle logs egress decisions but doesn't
+  chain them. A tamper-evident audit record per session would be useful
+  for the compliance use case the CubeSandbox positioning targets.

docs/research/hn-agent-safety-discourse-july-2026.md

@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+# HN discourse on agent sandbox safety — June/July 2026
+
+A survey of community opinion and notable security disclosures on Hacker
+News and adjacent sources over June–July 2026. The question: what does
+the current discourse say about whether sandboxes are sufficient for
+agentic AI safety, and where does bot-bottle land against the issues
+being raised?
+
+Research conducted 2026-07-18.
+
+## Summary
+
+The past month marks a turning point in community opinion. Earlier in
+2026, the debate was mostly "which sandbox tool is best?" By June–July,
+a cascade of critical CVEs and novel attack classes has shifted the
+framing to "sandboxes are not enough — what else do you need?" The
+attacks that drove this shift are structurally distinct: most route
+through legitimate, trusted channels (Sentry issues, MCP descriptions,
+README files) rather than exploiting the isolation boundary directly.
+
+bot-bottle's architecture holds up well against the direct-escape class
+(Firecracker/Apple Container default backends, credentials never in the
+agent's env, harness entirely on the host). The remaining gap is prompt
+injection — attacker-controlled data interpreted as model instructions.
+Egress controls and prompt injection defenses are orthogonal: egress
+limits what the agent can *send out*; injection is about what it is
+*told to do*. The two don't substitute for each other. Inside a tightly-
+egressed sandbox a successful injection can't exfiltrate to unknown
+hosts, but it can still corrupt the work product, push malicious commits
+past a secret scanner, or use allowlisted channels for exfiltration.
+Those residual risks are addressed below.
+
+## The sandboxing boom sets the stage
+
+The preceding months generated a wave of sandbox tooling. A March 28
+Ask HN thread
+([#47444917](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47444917)) catalogued
+the explosion: E2B, AIO Sandbox, AgentSphere, Yolobox, Exe.dev,
+AgentFence, DenoSandbox, Capsule (WASM), ERA, Vibekit, Daytona, Modal,
+Nono, and more — all launched within roughly 12 months. A parallel March
+9 thread ([#47185250](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47185250))
+surveyed what developers were actually deploying: "containers or YOLO"
+dominated. The honest community mood was that most teams hadn't solved
+this and were shipping anyway.
+
+## The June–July attack cascade
+
+Six attack patterns broke in quick succession. Together they form the
+argument that the community's framing was wrong: the threat model for
+agents isn't just "code that escapes its container" — it's also prompt
+injection, where attacker-controlled data is interpreted as model
+instructions regardless of whether any isolation boundary was crossed.
+Sections 2–4 below are all the same attack class; the "trusted channel"
+label describes the delivery vector, not a different threat.
+
+### 1. Sandbox escape CVEs (DuneSlide, CVE-2026-39861)
+
+Cato AI Labs disclosed **DuneSlide** (CVE-2026-50548/50549, CVSS 9.8),
+a pair of flaws in Cursor 2.x. CVE-2026-50548 abuses the sandbox's
+`working_directory` parameter to point writes at system files; CVE-26-50549
+exploits a symlink-resolution fallback that fails open. Both start with
+a prompt injection and end in sandbox escape — and Cato's framing was
+blunt: "each CVE defeats a different guardrail; the problem is
+structural, not a string of one-offs."
+
+Claude Code's own sandbox had a similar escape this year:
+**CVE-2026-39861** (symlink flaw). The CurXecute/MCPoison/CVE-2026-26268
+chain from Cursor added a poisoned Slack message, a swap-after-approval
+MCP config, and a Git hook as three more entry points in the same
+attack class.
+
+All patched, but the pattern holds: any application-level sandbox that
+takes attacker-influenced values as path parameters is reachable from a
+prompt injection.
+
+### 2. Prompt injection via MCP data (Agentjacking)
+
+Tenet's "Agentjacking" technique planted a fake bug report in Sentry's
+MCP output. When an agent queries Sentry to fix open issues, the
+malicious event is rendered as structured content visually
+indistinguishable from a real Sentry event, and the agent executes the
+embedded instructions with the developer's full privileges. Hit rate
+across Claude Code and Cursor: **85%**. The route is entirely through a
+legitimately-authorized MCP channel — no isolation boundary is crossed;
+the injection arrives inbound through a channel the sandbox explicitly
+trusts.
+
+The Cloud Security Alliance's summary: treat observability, bug-report,
+and integration data as **untrusted agent input**, not neutral
+development metadata.
+
+### 3. README-embedded prompt injection
+
+A July disclosure showed malicious instructions hidden in `README.md`
+— a file that receives no trust prompt and requires no elevated access.
+When asked point-blank whether the repo held hidden instructions, both
+Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.5 said no. A payload written for Sonnet
+4.6 transferred unchanged to Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, and GPT-5.5. The
+attack surface is every repo an agent is asked to work in.
+
+### 4. Prompt injection via MCP tool descriptions
+
+Microsoft research (June 30) showed that attacker-controlled MCP tool
+description fields can silently redirect agent behavior. The injection
+is embedded in metadata the model reads during tool selection — before
+any sandbox enforcement or egress check runs, and entirely on the
+inbound path that egress controls cannot touch.
+
+### 5. MCP STDIO command injection (10 CVEs)
+
+OX Security disclosed a systemic command injection class in Anthropic's
+MCP protocol, covering 10 CVEs across multiple coding agents. The
+Windsurf case (CVE-2026-30615): processing attacker-controlled HTML
+causes the agent to auto-register a malicious MCP STDIO server and
+execute arbitrary commands with no further user interaction.
+
+### 6. LiteLLM gateway compromise (CVE-2026-40217, CVE-2026-42271)
+
+CVE-2026-40217 exposes LiteLLM's guardrail sandbox via `exec()` with no
+source filtering. CVE-2026-42271 (exploited in the wild, added to CISA's
+KEV catalog) lets callers spawn subprocesses through MCP preview
+endpoints. The threat extends to any agent routed through a compromised
+LiteLLM proxy: the proxy can swap model responses for forged tool calls
+in transit, giving the attacker a reverse shell from the developer's
+machine.
+
+## HN community opinion clusters
+
+**"Move enforcement to the kernel, not the app"** — the Nono Show HN
+([#46849615](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46849615)) and a
+kernel-sandbox thread
+([#47066574](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066574)) both argued
+that application-layer sandboxes are inherently bypassable by the code
+they're sandboxing. The academic framing, from *Red-Teaming the Agentic
+Red-Team* ([arXiv 2606.24496](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.24496)):
+"enforcement should occur at the OS level via the kernel refusing system
+calls that violate policy at runtime — not pre-execution argument
+validation in tool calls."
+
+**"The harness belongs outside the sandbox"** — a May thread
+([#47990675](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47990675)) converged
+on clean architectural separation: harness in one VM, tool execution in
+another. Top comment: "having the harness in one VM, and tool use applied
+to user data in another, is about as safe as you can be at present."
+Several replies described a hypervisor-like policy layer — sitting outside
+both VMs — as the right long-term model.
+
+**"Sandboxes are too coarse-grained"** — a Feb thread
+([#47006445](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47006445)) argued
+that VMs don't answer the real question: knowing whether an agent
+*should* be sending an email or making a transaction. "Everything's just
+in the same big box." This framing picked up traction through June–July
+as the trusted-channel attacks dominated.
+
+**"MCP's trust model is the real problem"** — the month's recurring
+theme. MCP by design gives agents access to authorized external services.
+Once a trusted channel delivers a malicious payload, filesystem sandboxing
+is irrelevant. The community call: treat all MCP tool metadata and return
+values as untrusted input subject to policy validation before ingestion,
+and disable automatic MCP server loading from untrusted repositories.
+
+## How bot-bottle addresses these issues
+
+### What it covers well
+
+**Direct sandbox escape (CVEs, container breakout)**
+
+bot-bottle's default backends are Firecracker microVM (KVM Linux) and
+Apple Container (macOS). Both run the agent in a separate VM with a
+dedicated kernel — the container-escape CVE class (Dirty Pipe, runc
+escapes, DuneSlide's path-parameter abuse) requires escaping a real
+hypervisor boundary, not just a namespace. On the legacy Docker backend,
+gVisor auto-detection provides a userspace syscall barrier for hosts where
+neither KVM nor Apple Container is available.
+
+The bot-bottle process itself runs entirely on the host, outside the VM.
+This is the "harness outside the sandbox" architecture the HN thread
+converged on as best practice. The bottle manifest, egress rules, and
+secrets never enter the agent VM.
+
+**Credential theft on sandbox escape**
+
+Even on a successful VM/container escape, the agent has nothing useful
+to steal. Credentials are injected in-flight by the gateway proxy
+(`auth.scheme` / `auth.token_ref` in the egress route config) — `printenv`
+inside the agent shows proxy URLs only. The git-gate similarly holds the
+upstream SSH credential on the host; the agent pushes through a
+gitleaks-scanned daemon that forwards clean refs upstream. An escaped
+agent gets the host filesystem, not the keys.
+
+**Orphaned-agent credential risk**
+
+bot-bottle is explicitly ephemeral: when the agent exits, `cli.py` tears
+down every gateway and both networks — nothing persists between runs. The
+agent never holds credentials, so there is nothing to orphan.
+
+**MCP config redirection / STDIO auto-registration**
+
+The trust boundary at `$HOME` means bottles live only under
+`~/.bot-bottle/bottles/` — a cloned repo cannot add egress routes or
+redirect env vars to attacker hosts (the design rationale is in
+`docs/prds/0011-per-file-md-manifest.md`). Auto-registering a malicious
+MCP STDIO server from within the agent is still sandboxed by the VM, and
+any outbound calls from that server must pass the egress allowlist and
+outbound DLP scanner.
+
+**Per-agent role tailoring (the "coarse-grained sandbox" complaint)**
+
+The Feb 2026 HN thread that argued "sandboxes are too coarse-grained"
+was pointing at a real gap: a VM isolates the filesystem but doesn't
+know whether an agent *should* be sending email or calling an external
+API. bot-bottle's bottle/agent split is a structural answer at the
+network layer — the bottle manifest declares exactly what each role can
+reach (which hosts, which paths, which HTTP methods), and the egress
+scanner enforces it. A `gitea-dev` bottle that only lists
+`gitea.dideric.is` and `api.anthropic.com` structurally cannot send
+email or reach AWS, not because the model was told not to, but because
+those routes don't exist.
+
+The `extends:` composition model means provider-level policy (the Claude
+auth route) lives in one base bottle and role-specific overlays are
+stacked on top — no duplication, and changing the base propagates to all
+derived roles.
+
+Competitive position on this axis (from `agent-sandbox-landscape.md`):
+
+| Tool | Agent-tailored policy |
+|---|---|
+| **bot-bottle** | Yes — declarative per-role manifest; `extends:` composition; egress + credentials scoped to role |
+| **tilde.run** | Yes — per-agent DSL RBAC (allow/deny/approve per action/repo/agent), but hosted SaaS |
+| **Microsoft AGT** | Yes — YAML policy + per-agent DID + trust score, but tool-call level only (no network isolation) |
+| **OAP** | Yes — declarative pre-action policy + cryptographic audit, but no isolation |
+| **Cleanroom** | Partial — per-repo `cleanroom.yaml`, not per-role |
+| **Docker sbx** | No — network presets only |
+| **Anthropic srt** | No — programmatic per-invocation |
+| **matchlock / smolmachines / microsandbox** | No |
+| **agent-safehouse** | Partial — per-agent Seatbelt profiles; no egress |
+
+Two takeaways: bot-bottle and tilde.run are the only isolation tools
+with declarative role-tailored policy; Microsoft AGT and OAP are the
+closest competitors on role-tailoring but operate at the tool-call layer
+without network/filesystem isolation — complementary, not substitutes.
+
+**Outbound exfiltration (any injection class)**
+
+Whatever triggers the agent — README injection, Agentjacking, MCP
+description poisoning — the final step in most attacks is exfiltration.
+bot-bottle's egress allowlist is default-deny with a per-bottle host
+allowlist; unknown hosts get a hard 403. Outbound DLP scanning
+(`outbound_detectors: [token_patterns, known_secrets]`) catches tokens
+and secrets in outbound bodies; the `supervise` policy (default for
+manifest routes) holds the request for operator approval rather than
+silently blocking it. Together these limit what a successful injection
+can *do* even if it succeeds at the model layer.
+
+**LiteLLM / compromised-proxy attacks**
+
+bot-bottle does not use LiteLLM. The model API route (e.g.
+`api.anthropic.com`) is an auto-injected provider route on the egress
+allowlist; the agent dials the gateway, not the model API directly.
+A compromised third-party proxy is not in the architecture.
+
+### Where it is weaker
+
+**Prompt injection**
+
+Egress controls and prompt injection defenses are orthogonal. Egress
+limits what the agent can *send out* (outbound leg); prompt injection
+is about what attacker-controlled data *tells the agent to do* (inbound
+leg). The two don't substitute for each other and must be treated
+separately.
+
+The inbound DLP scanner (`inbound_detectors: [naive_injection_detection]`)
+is the only runtime defense against injection arriving through allowlisted
+channels — Sentry MCP responses, MCP tool descriptions, README content.
+It is explicitly pattern-matching and will not catch a sufficiently
+crafted payload. There is no semantic / intent-level gate between what
+the model decides and what the agent executes.
+
+**Blast radius within the permitted scope**
+
+Inside a tightly-egressed sandbox a successful injection can't
+exfiltrate to unknown hosts, but it still has real options:
+
+- *Work product corruption.* The agent can modify, delete, or backdoor
+  files in the working directory. This is within its permitted scope;
+  egress controls have nothing to say about it.
+
+- *Malicious commits past the git-gate.* The git-gate scans outbound
+  refs for secrets (gitleaks), not for semantic code intent. A prompt-
+  injected agent can commit subtly malicious code — logic bombs,
+  backdoored auth paths, code that exfiltrates data through the
+  application's own HTTP clients at runtime — that looks clean to a
+  secret scanner.
+
+- *Exfiltration through allowlisted channels.* If an attacker knows or
+  can predict what hosts are in the egress allowlist, those channels are
+  available for exfiltration. A GitHub remote being allowlisted means
+  "push to an attacker-controlled fork" is viable. A logging endpoint
+  being allowlisted means structured data can leave through it. The
+  outbound DLP scanner catches credential tokens and known secrets but
+  not arbitrary business data.
+
+- *Dependency installation within the sandbox.* An agent that runs
+  `npm install` or `pip install` on attacker-specified packages executes
+  code inside the sandbox with the same capabilities the agent has:
+  filesystem access, tool calls, calls to allowlisted hosts. Supply chain
+  injection via package names is in the same injection family, triggered
+  by the same prompt-injection path.
+
+### What would close the remaining gaps
+
+The blast-radius risks above point at two distinct mitigations that
+don't yet exist in bot-bottle:
+
+- *Outbound intent classification.* The egress addon today scans
+  outbound request content for token patterns. What it lacks is
+  awareness of context — it can't distinguish "agent is pushing a
+  legitimate commit" from "agent was injected and is pushing a backdoor."
+  The `supervise` policy is already the right shape for human-in-the-loop
+  review on sensitive outbound actions; extending it with context from
+  the agent's recent tool calls (what files were touched, what was the
+  triggering task) would narrow the gap.
+
+- *Semantic code review on git push.* gitleaks is the wrong tool for
+  catching injected logic. A review step on outbound commits — even a
+  simple diff summary surfaced in `cli.py supervise` before the push is
+  forwarded — would close the malicious-commit path without requiring
+  the agent to be fully trusted.
+
+## Sources
+
+- [Ask HN: The new wave of AI agent sandboxes? (Mar 2026)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47444917)
+- [OK, let's survey how everybody is sandboxing AI coding agents (Mar 2026)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47185250)
+- [The agent harness belongs outside the sandbox (May 2026)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47990675)
+- [Show HN: Nono – Kernel-enforced sandboxing for AI agents (Feb 2026)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46849615)
+- [Kernel-enforced sandbox for AI agents, MCP and LLM workloads (Feb 2026)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066574)
+- [Sandboxes will be left in 2026 (Feb 2026)](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47006445)
+- [Critical Cursor Flaws / DuneSlide – The Hacker News](https://thehackernews.com/2026/07/critical-cursor-flaws-could-let-prompt.html)
+- [Agentjacking Attack – The Hacker News](https://thehackernews.com/2026/06/agentjacking-attack-tricks-ai-coding.html)
+- [Friendly Fire: AI Agents Built to Catch Malicious Code – The Hacker News](https://thehackernews.com/2026/07/friendly-fire-ai-agents-built-to-catch.html)
+- [Microsoft Warns Poisoned MCP Tool Descriptions – The Hacker News](https://thehackernews.com/2026/06/microsoft-warns-poisoned-mcp-tool.html)
+- [MCP STDIO Command Injection Advisory – OX Security](https://www.ox.security/blog/mcp-supply-chain-advisory-rce-vulnerabilities-across-the-ai-ecosystem/)
+- [LiteLLM Vulnerability Chain – The Hacker News](https://thehackernews.com/2026/06/litellm-vulnerability-chain-lets-low.html)
+- [Red-Teaming the Agentic Red-Team (arXiv 2606.24496)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.24496)

docs/research/malicious-commit-scanning.md

@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+# Scanning for malicious commits at the git-gate — and whether the semantic layer is a paid feature
+
+A sandboxed agent's most durable way out isn't live exfiltration — it's the
+**artifact it pushes**. Code committed through the git-gate leaves the
+sandbox and runs *later*, in CI or production, with none of the bottle's
+isolation or egress control. gitleaks covers *secrets* on that channel
+(see [`git-gate` pre-receive](../../bot_bottle/git_gate_render.py)); this
+note asks the harder question — can we scan for *malicious code* in
+commits — and the product question the answer raises: is the semantic
+(LLM) layer a decent paid feature on "git egress," alongside a paid
+human-review console for the supervise flow?
+
+## Summary
+
+- **No scanner reliably detects malicious code.** It's undecidable in
+  general and adversarial in practice — a capable agent hides a backdoor
+  from any pattern scanner (and from human reviewers). So the frame is not
+  "detect malice"; it's **raise the cost, cover the common/obvious cases,
+  and put a human on the high-leverage ones.**
+- **Layered, ranked by ROI:** (1) supply-chain / malicious-dependency
+  scanning (Socket, OSV-Scanner, GuardDog) — highest ROI, best git fit;
+  (2) fast heuristic / obfuscation / dangerous-sink scanning
+  (Semgrep-on-diff) — gitleaks-shaped; (3) **risk-based human gating** via
+  the existing supervise plane on high-risk file classes; (4) **LLM
+  semantic diff-review** as a best-effort backstop for novel backdoors.
+- **Architecture:** the git-gate's `pre-receive` is *synchronous* (it
+  blocks the push), so run only fast scanners inline and push heavy
+  analysis (CodeQL, full LLM review) to an **async post-push CI lane** that
+  can't hold the developer hostage.
+- **Monetization verdict: yes — but the paid unit is the *governed
+  git-egress review bundle*, not the raw scanner.** The pre-receive
+  mechanics and the fast OSS scanners stay free (open-core social
+  contract, same as gitleaks). The sell is the control-plane workflow
+  around them: **managed semantic review + a web-console human-review flow
+  + RBAC + audit retention + cross-run policy.** A bare per-push scan is
+  borderline "single-run = free" by our own heuristic, and its detection
+  accuracy is not something to sell on. Sell the *workflow and the
+  governance*, not the detector.
+
+## The threat: temporal escape
+
+This is the one containment fundamentally can't close. bot-bottle's VM
+isolation + egress DLP shrink *live* exfiltration, but the git push
+channel launders a payload past all of it: the agent commits code that
+looks benign at review time and does its work later, outside the
+perimeter — the "blind-XSS"-style temporal escape that both the "3 reasons
+sandboxing won't secure your AI agent" talk and Embroidery's "In sandboxes
+we (shouldn't) trust" call the sharpest gap. gitleaks gates *secrets* on
+this channel; malicious *code* is the uncovered surface, and it's the
+behavioral half of the isolation-vs-behavioral split noted in
+[`agent-sandbox-landscape.md`](agent-sandbox-landscape.md).
+
+## Why it's fundamentally hard
+
+Distinguishing malicious from legitimate code is undecidable in general
+and adversarial in the specific. The underhanded-code contests show humans
+hide backdoors from *human reviewers*; a scanner reduces to regex/dataflow
+heuristics a motivated agent writes around. So "catch malicious commits"
+is the wrong success metric. The right ones: *how much did we raise the
+cost*, *did we cover the common and the obvious*, and *did a human see the
+dangerous changes before they left*.
+
+## Landscape of git-pluggable approaches (ranked by ROI)
+
+1. **Supply-chain / malicious-dependency scanning — highest ROI.** The
+   most likely agent-introduced threat is a malicious or typosquatted
+   *dependency*, not a hand-written backdoor — and it's far more
+   detectable. **Socket** (behavioral analysis of packages: install
+   scripts, obfuscation, unexpected network/fs access, typosquats) is the
+   closest thing to malicious-intent detection that actually works;
+   **OSV-Scanner** (known-bad DB, fast) and **GuardDog** (PyPI/npm
+   heuristics) complement it. Trigger only when a commit changes a
+   lockfile/manifest → block or escalate.
+2. **Fast heuristic / obfuscation / dangerous-sink scanning.** **Semgrep**
+   with a curated ruleset, scanning the *diff* (fast enough for
+   pre-receive). Catches obfuscation (`eval(atob(...))`, base64/hex blobs,
+   minified source), exfil primitives (`curl | sh`, reverse shells,
+   DNS-exfil), and dangerous sinks (`shell=True`, `pickle.loads`, unsafe
+   `yaml.load`, `child_process.exec`). Tune noisy rules to *escalate*, not
+   block.
+3. **Risk-based human gating — the most robust control, already
+   half-built.** The git-gate already escalates `# gitleaks:allow`
+   findings to a supervisor proposal and blocks the push pending approval
+   (`supervise_gitleaks_allow`, [`git_gate_render.py`](../../bot_bottle/git_gate_render.py)).
+   Extend the same flow to **high-risk file classes**: any commit touching
+   CI/build/deploy scripts, auth/crypto code, egress config, or
+   adding/changing dependencies → route to `./cli.py supervise`. This is
+   attribution/policy, not detection, and it's the strongest thing here —
+   a human on exactly the temporal-escape surfaces.
+4. **LLM semantic diff-review — the behavioral backstop.** The only
+   approach with a shot at a novel, benign-looking backdoor: a model
+   reviews the diff for a backdoor / exfiltration / obfuscated payload /
+   dangerous behavior. This is the behavioral-detection thesis applied to
+   the *artifact* (the diff) rather than the agent's reasoning. Real
+   caveats: false positives and negatives, latency/cost, it can be
+   prompt-injected by hostile content *in the diff itself*, and it invites
+   over-trust. Useful, never a guarantee.
+
+**Not for this job:** CodeQL, Trivy, Grype, Bandit. They find *known
+vulns and insecure patterns* (bugs), not deliberate backdoors, and the
+powerful ones (CodeQL taint) need a build + database — too heavy for a
+synchronous gate. They belong in the async CI lane if at all.
+
+## Fit into bot-bottle's git-gate
+
+The `pre-receive` hook today is: gitleaks-scan each ref → escalate
+`# gitleaks:allow` findings to supervise → forward to upstream
+([`git_gate_render.py`](../../bot_bottle/git_gate_render.py)). The
+additions slot in cleanly:
+
+- **Inline (fast), before forward:** a dep-scan phase (on manifest/lockfile
+  change) and a Semgrep-diff phase. Findings block or open a supervise
+  proposal, same shape as gitleaks.
+- **New supervise tool types** alongside the existing
+  `egress-block/allow`, `gitleaks-allow`, `egress-token-allow`
+  ([`supervise_types.py`](../../bot_bottle/supervise_types.py)) — e.g. a
+  `commit-review` proposal for risky-file-class gating and for semantic
+  review. The supervise plane is already the right abstraction; this is
+  another *producer* feeding it, and [`supervise_server.py`](../../bot_bottle/supervise_server.py)
+  (JSON-RPC) is already the console backend.
+- **Async lane (heavy):** full LLM review + any CodeQL run out of band
+  after the push, feeding the same review/audit surface, so the
+  synchronous gate stays fast.
+
+## The product question: paid feature on git egress?
+
+Restating the open-core line bot-bottle runs on: *give away the
+sandbox/runtime, charge for the control plane; single-run/single-node =
+free, cross-run aggregation + central enforcement + identity/fleet = paid;
+the moat is uniform egress audit + secret custody + policy across
+untrusted agents.*
+
+Against that line, the split is clean:
+
+**Free (OSS runtime — the trust funnel):**
+- the `pre-receive` gate mechanics and gitleaks;
+- wiring the OSS scanners (Socket CLI / OSV-Scanner / Semgrep);
+- the CLI supervise flow.
+Keeping the raw scanners free is the same social contract as gitleaks and
+preserves the bottom-up distribution funnel.
+
+**Paid (the governed git-egress bundle — the control plane):**
+- **Managed semantic diff-review** — hosted inference + a curated,
+  maintained malicious-pattern/policy set. This is *capability* (metered),
+  not *insurance* — the thing individuals actually pay for. Position it as
+  **governed code-egress review**, not "we resell inference" (the
+  monetization notes explicitly warn against reselling compute).
+- **The web-console supervise/review flow — the strongest anchor.** Turn
+  the CLI `./cli.py supervise` approval into a real review surface:
+  rendered diff + finding context, approve/reject, **who-approved audit
+  trail, RBAC on approvers, mobile/phone-control** (ties to the
+  dashboard/vault north star). This is "central enforcement +
+  identity/fleet = paid" almost verbatim — and it generalizes across
+  *every* supervise proposal (egress block/allow, gitleaks-allow,
+  commit-review), so it's worth building for the whole plane, with the
+  semantic check as one producer.
+- **Cross-run governance:** fleet-wide policy for what escalates,
+  review-decision history/search/export, and drift alerts.
+
+**Why it fits the moat rather than bolting on:** a git push *is* an egress
+channel. A semantic review + human approval + audit on it extends the
+uniform "egress audit + custody + policy across untrusted agents" wedge to
+**code artifacts** — the same product, applied to the one channel gitleaks
+only half-covers. That's on-moat, not a detour.
+
+**The honest nuance (don't oversell):** a bare per-push LLM scan is
+arguably *free* by the single-run heuristic, and its detection accuracy is
+not defensible to charge for. The paid value is the **governance around
+it** — the console, RBAC, audit retention, cross-run policy — plus the
+managed capability. Sell the *review-and-approve-and-audit workflow*; let
+the detector be explicitly best-effort. And per the monetization
+guardrail, the "anti-corporate" free crowd must not veto these team
+features: the review console + RBAC + audit *are* the monetization.
+
+## Recommendation
+
+1. **Land the free layer first.** Add the dep-scan and Semgrep-diff phases
+   to `pre-receive`, and extend supervise to risky-file-class gating —
+   reuses existing machinery, immediate value, stays OSS.
+2. **Build the supervise web console** over `supervise_server`'s JSON-RPC
+   (already the Phase-1 move in the monetization path). This is the paid
+   anchor and it serves *all* proposal types, not just commit review.
+3. **Add managed semantic diff-review as a paid producer** feeding that
+   console — "governed code-egress review," metered, explicitly
+   best-effort on detection.
+4. **Don't oversell detection.** Market the workflow (review + approve +
+   audit) and the cross-run policy/RBAC, where the value is real and
+   defensible; keep the raw scanners open.
+
+## Sources / references
+
+- [`agent-sandbox-landscape.md`](agent-sandbox-landscape.md) — the
+  egress-DLP gap and isolation-vs-behavioral framing.
+- Git-gate internals: [`git_gate_render.py`](../../bot_bottle/git_gate_render.py),
+  [`supervise_types.py`](../../bot_bottle/supervise_types.py),
+  [`supervise_server.py`](../../bot_bottle/supervise_server.py).
+- External tools: Socket (socket.dev), OSV-Scanner (google/osv-scanner),
+  GuardDog (DataDog/guarddog), Semgrep (semgrep/semgrep).
+- Threat framing: "3 reasons sandboxing won't secure your AI agent"
+  (youtube TsYDazwHJ6U); Embroidery, "In sandboxes we (shouldn't) trust."
+- The authoritative monetization/positioning analysis (the open-core line,
+  the wedge, single-run-free/cross-run-paid) lives in the **separate
+  `bot-bottle-console` repo**, not this one — cited here from memory, not
+  linked.

scripts/tracker_policy.py

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Enforce the repository's issue/PR metadata policy in Gitea Actions."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import json
+import os
+import re
+import urllib.error
+import urllib.request
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import Any
+
+
+ISSUE_REFERENCE = re.compile(
+    r"(?im)\b(?:close[sd]?|fix(?:e[sd])?|resolve[sd]?|part\s+of|"
+    r"related\s+to|refs?|references)\s+#(\d+)\b"
+)
+TRIAGE_LABEL = "Status/Needs Triage"
+
+
+def deliberate_issue_numbers(title: str, body: str) -> set[int]:
+    """Return same-repository issue numbers referenced intentionally."""
+    return {int(match) for match in ISSUE_REFERENCE.findall(f"{title}\n{body}")}
+
+
+class GiteaApi:
+    """Small API client using the Actions-provided repository token."""
+
+    def __init__(self, api_url: str, repository: str, token: str) -> None:
+        self.base = f"{api_url.rstrip('/')}/repos/{repository}"
+        self.token = token
+
+    def request(self, method: str, path: str, payload: object | None = None) -> Any:
+        data = None if payload is None else json.dumps(payload).encode()
+        request = urllib.request.Request(
+            f"{self.base}{path}",
+            data=data,
+            method=method,
+            headers={
+                "Authorization": f"token {self.token}",
+                "Content-Type": "application/json",
+            },
+        )
+        with urllib.request.urlopen(request, timeout=15) as response:
+            if response.status == 204:
+                return None
+            return json.load(response)
+
+
+def check_pull_request(event: dict[str, Any], api: GiteaApi) -> list[str]:
+    """Return policy violations for a pull_request event."""
+    pull = event["pull_request"]
+    errors: list[str] = []
+    labels = pull.get("labels") or []
+    if labels:
+        errors.append(
+            "PRs must be unlabeled; put tracker metadata on the linked issue "
+            f"(found: {', '.join(label['name'] for label in labels)})."
+        )
+
+    numbers = deliberate_issue_numbers(pull.get("title", ""), pull.get("body", ""))
+    if not numbers:
+        errors.append(
+            "PR must reference an issue with Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N, "
+            "Part of #N, Related to #N, Refs #N, or References #N."
+        )
+        return errors
+
+    real_issues = 0
+    for number in sorted(numbers):
+        try:
+            item = api.request("GET", f"/issues/{number}")
+        except urllib.error.HTTPError as error:
+            if error.code == 404:
+                errors.append(f"Referenced issue #{number} does not exist.")
+                continue
+            raise
+        if item.get("pull_request") is not None:
+            errors.append(f"#{number} is a pull request, not an issue.")
+        else:
+            real_issues += 1
+
+    if not real_issues and not errors:
+        errors.append("PR must reference at least one real issue.")
+    return errors
+
+
+def ensure_issue_label(event: dict[str, Any], api: GiteaApi) -> bool:
+    """Apply the triage label if an issue event leaves the issue unlabeled."""
+    issue = event["issue"]
+    if issue.get("pull_request") is not None or issue.get("labels"):
+        return False
+    labels = api.request("GET", "/labels?limit=100")
+    triage = next((label for label in labels if label["name"] == TRIAGE_LABEL), None)
+    if triage is None:
+        raise RuntimeError(f"repository label {TRIAGE_LABEL!r} does not exist")
+    api.request("POST", f"/issues/{issue['number']}/labels", {"labels": [triage["id"]]})
+    return True
+
+
+def _load_event(path: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    return json.loads(Path(path).read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
+    parser.add_argument("command", choices=("check-pr", "label-issue"))
+    parser.add_argument("--event", default=os.environ.get("GITHUB_EVENT_PATH"))
+    args = parser.parse_args()
+    if not args.event:
+        parser.error("--event or GITHUB_EVENT_PATH is required")
+
+    api = GiteaApi(
+        os.environ["GITHUB_API_URL"],
+        os.environ["GITHUB_REPOSITORY"],
+        os.environ["GITHUB_TOKEN"],
+    )
+    event = _load_event(args.event)
+    if args.command == "check-pr":
+        errors = check_pull_request(event, api)
+        if errors:
+            print("\n".join(f"::error::{error}" for error in errors))
+            return 1
+        print("PR tracker policy passed.")
+        return 0
+
+    changed = ensure_issue_label(event, api)
+    print(f"Applied {TRIAGE_LABEL}." if changed else "Issue already has a label.")
+    return 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    raise SystemExit(main())

tests/_bin.py

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+"""Resolved paths to system binaries used by subprocess-based tests.
+
+NixOS and other non-FHS hosts don't populate ``/bin`` (there is no
+``/bin/sleep``), so tests that spawn real short-lived helper processes
+must resolve the binary from ``PATH`` rather than hardcoding an FHS path.
+Import the resolved constant (e.g. ``SLEEP``) instead of writing
+``/bin/sleep`` inline.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import shutil
+
+
+def resolve(name: str, fallback: str) -> str:
+    """Absolute path to ``name`` from ``PATH``; ``fallback`` on FHS hosts
+    where the binary isn't on ``PATH`` but lives at a known ``/bin`` path."""
+    return shutil.which(name) or fallback
+
+
+# Real ``sleep`` binary. ``/bin/sleep`` is absent on NixOS; resolve from
+# PATH so subprocess tests run instead of erroring with FileNotFoundError.
+SLEEP = resolve("sleep", "/bin/sleep")

tests/unit/test_cli_dispatch.py

@@ -95,5 +95,60 @@ class TestMainDispatch(unittest.TestCase):
             self.assertEqual(130, main(["x"]))
 
 
+class TestMigrationGate(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The dispatcher's schema-migration gate (cli/__init__.py)."""
+
+    def setUp(self) -> None:
+        # Force the "schema out of date" branch for every test here.
+        patcher = patch.object(StoreManager, "is_migrated", return_value=False)
+        patcher.start()
+        self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
+        self.addCleanup(StoreManager.reset)
+
+    def test_store_command_blocks_when_stdin_cannot_confirm(self) -> None:
+        # Non-TTY stdin at EOF (as in CI): the [y/N] prompt reads "" and the
+        # command is refused rather than migrating silently.
+        ran: list[bool] = []
+
+        def handler(_rest: list[str]) -> int:
+            ran.append(True)
+            return 0
+
+        with patch.dict(climod.COMMANDS, {"list": handler}), \
+                patch("sys.stdin", io.StringIO("")), \
+                patch("sys.stderr", io.StringIO()):
+            self.assertEqual(1, main(["list"]))
+        self.assertEqual([], ran, "gated command must not dispatch")
+
+    def test_backend_command_skips_gate(self) -> None:
+        # `backend` provisions/probes the host and never opens the store, so
+        # it must run even on an unmigrated DB with unanswerable stdin.
+        ran: list[bool] = []
+
+        def handler(_rest: list[str]) -> int:
+            ran.append(True)
+            return 0
+
+        with patch.dict(climod.COMMANDS, {"backend": handler}), \
+                patch("sys.stdin", io.StringIO("")), \
+                patch("sys.stderr", io.StringIO()):
+            self.assertEqual(0, main(["backend", "status"]))
+        self.assertEqual([True], ran, "exempt command must dispatch")
+
+    def test_store_command_migrates_on_confirmation(self) -> None:
+        migrated: list[bool] = []
+
+        def handler(_rest: list[str]) -> int:
+            return 0
+
+        with patch.dict(climod.COMMANDS, {"list": handler}), \
+                patch.object(StoreManager, "migrate",
+                             side_effect=lambda: migrated.append(True)), \
+                patch("sys.stdin", io.StringIO("y\n")), \
+                patch("sys.stderr", io.StringIO()):
+            self.assertEqual(0, main(["list"]))
+        self.assertEqual([True], migrated, "confirmed gate must migrate")
+
+
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()

tests/unit/test_gateway_init.py

@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 
 Tests both the helper functions in `bot_bottle.gateway_init`
 and the supervisor's end-to-end signal / exit-code behavior. The
-end-to-end tests use real subprocesses (`/bin/sleep`,
+end-to-end tests use real subprocesses (`sleep`, `/bin/sh -c '...'`) —
-`/bin/sh -c '...'`) — short-lived, no docker required — so they
+short-lived, no docker required — so they run under `tests/unit/`
-run under `tests/unit/` rather than `tests/integration/`."""
+rather than `tests/integration/`."""
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ from bot_bottle.gateway_init import (
     _env_for_daemon,
     _selected_daemons,
 )
+from tests._bin import SLEEP
 
 
 class TestEnvForDaemon(unittest.TestCase):
@@ -182,7 +183,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         # up and the supervisor never set shutdown_at.
         specs = [
             _DaemonSpec("crasher", ("/bin/sh", "-c", "exit 1")),
-            _DaemonSpec("longrun", ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("longrun", (SLEEP, "30")),
         ]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
@@ -214,7 +215,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         # signal-killed longrun's negative returncode.
         specs = [
             _DaemonSpec("crasher", ("/bin/sh", "-c", "exit 1")),
-            _DaemonSpec("longrun", ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("longrun", (SLEEP, "30")),
         ]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
@@ -259,7 +260,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         )
         specs = [
             _DaemonSpec("egress", sighup_marker),
-            _DaemonSpec("other",  ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("other",  (SLEEP, "30")),
         ]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
@@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self._drive(sup)
 
     def test_forward_signal_unknown_daemon_no_op(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", ("/bin/sleep", "30"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", (SLEEP, "30"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         delivered = sup.forward_signal(signal.SIGHUP, "ghost")
@@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         # Restart one daemon; the other (supervise, the MCP server
         # in production) must remain untouched.
         specs = [
-            _DaemonSpec("git-gate", ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("git-gate", (SLEEP, "30")),
-            _DaemonSpec("supervise", ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("supervise", (SLEEP, "30")),
         ]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
@@ -319,8 +320,8 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
 
     def test_request_restart_is_drained_by_tick(self):
         specs = [
-            _DaemonSpec("git-gate", ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("git-gate", (SLEEP, "30")),
-            _DaemonSpec("supervise", ("/bin/sleep", "30")),
+            _DaemonSpec("supervise", (SLEEP, "30")),
         ]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
@@ -343,7 +344,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self._drive(sup)
 
     def test_repeated_restart_requests_coalesce(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("git-gate", ("/bin/sleep", "30"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("git-gate", (SLEEP, "30"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         time.sleep(0.1)
@@ -366,7 +367,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self._drive(sup)
 
     def test_request_restart_unknown_daemon_no_op(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", ("/bin/sleep", "30"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", (SLEEP, "30"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         ok = sup.request_restart("ghost")
@@ -376,7 +377,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self._drive(sup)
 
     def test_restart_unknown_daemon_no_op(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", ("/bin/sleep", "30"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", (SLEEP, "30"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         ok = sup.restart_daemon("ghost")
@@ -385,7 +386,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self._drive(sup)
 
     def test_restart_during_shutdown_is_no_op(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("git-gate", ("/bin/sleep", "30"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("git-gate", (SLEEP, "30"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         sup.request_shutdown(reason="test")
@@ -395,7 +396,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self._drive(sup)
 
     def test_pending_restart_dropped_during_shutdown(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("git-gate", ("/bin/sleep", "30"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("git-gate", (SLEEP, "30"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         time.sleep(0.1)
@@ -413,8 +414,8 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         # both should receive SIGTERM and exit. Signal-only
         # shutdown clamps to a zero supervisor exit code.
         specs = [
-            _DaemonSpec("a", ("/bin/sleep", "60")),
+            _DaemonSpec("a", (SLEEP, "60")),
-            _DaemonSpec("b", ("/bin/sleep", "60")),
+            _DaemonSpec("b", (SLEEP, "60")),
         ]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
@@ -449,7 +450,7 @@ class TestSupervisor(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(0, rc)
 
     def test_idempotent_shutdown_requests(self):
-        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", ("/bin/sleep", "60"))]
+        specs = [_DaemonSpec("a", (SLEEP, "60"))]
         sup = _Supervisor(specs)
         sup.start_all()
         time.sleep(0.1)
@@ -470,7 +471,7 @@ class TestMainEndToEnd(unittest.TestCase):
 
     @classmethod
     def setUpClass(cls):
-        for p in ("/bin/sh", "/bin/sleep"):
+        for p in ("/bin/sh", SLEEP):
             if not Path(p).exists():
                 raise unittest.SkipTest(f"missing {p}")
 
@@ -485,8 +486,8 @@ class TestMainEndToEnd(unittest.TestCase):
             "import os, runpy, sys\n"
             "from bot_bottle import gateway_init as si\n"
             "si._DAEMONS = (\n"
-            "  si._DaemonSpec('alpha', ('/bin/sleep','30')),\n"
+            f"  si._DaemonSpec('alpha', ({SLEEP!r},'30')),\n"
-            "  si._DaemonSpec('beta',  ('/bin/sleep','30')),\n"
+            f"  si._DaemonSpec('beta',  ({SLEEP!r},'30')),\n"
             ")\n"
             "sys.exit(si.main([]))\n"
         )

tests/unit/test_git_gate.py

@@ -168,16 +168,18 @@ class TestHookRender(unittest.TestCase):
         # Stdin is buffered to a tempfile so both phases can re-read.
         self.assertIn("refs_file=$(mktemp)", hook)
 
-    def test_new_ref_scan_scoped_to_incoming_commits(self):
+    def test_scan_scoped_to_incoming_commits(self):
-        # A new branch (old=all-zeros) must scan only commits new to the
+        # Every non-delete push scans only commits new to the gate, not
-        # gate, not the full ancestry — otherwise historical findings
+        # the full ancestry and not the `$old..$new` delta — otherwise
-        # block every new-branch push (PRD 0028 / issue #106).
+        # historical fixtures block new-branch pushes (PRD 0028 / #106)
+        # and a rebase/force-push onto an advanced main drags in main's
+        # history incl. the sandbox-escape fixtures (#346).
         hook = git_gate_render_hook()
         self.assertIn('log_opts="$new --not --all"', hook)
-        # The old over-broad full-ancestry range must be gone.
+        # Neither the full-ancestry range nor the ancestry-blind delta
+        # range may survive.
         self.assertNotIn('log_opts="$new"', hook)
-        # Existing-branch delta scan is unchanged.
+        self.assertNotIn('log_opts="$old..$new"', hook)
-        self.assertIn('log_opts="$old..$new"', hook)
 
     def test_forward_ssh_is_non_interactive_and_bounded(self):
         # No prompt (BatchMode) and a connect timeout, so an unreachable

tests/unit/test_supervise_server.py

@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ from bot_bottle.supervise_server import (
     _RpcError,
     _RpcInternalError,
     _response_timeout_from_env,
+    format_pending_response_text,
     format_response_text,
+    handle_check_proposal,
     handle_initialize,
     handle_tools_call,
     handle_tools_list,
@@ -218,6 +220,7 @@ class TestHandleToolsList(unittest.TestCase):
                 _sv.TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW,
                 _sv.TOOL_EGRESS_BLOCK,
                 _sv.TOOL_LIST_EGRESS_ROUTES,
+                _sv.TOOL_CHECK_PROPOSAL,
             ]),
             sorted(names),
         )
@@ -484,9 +487,10 @@ class TestFormatResponseText(unittest.TestCase):
 
 class TestFormatPendingResponseText(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_formats_timeout_message(self):
-        text = supervise_server.format_pending_response_text(12.5)
+        text = supervise_server.format_pending_response_text("prop-9", 12.5)
         self.assertIn("status: pending", text)
         self.assertIn("12.5s", text)
+        self.assertIn("proposal_id: prop-9", text)
 
 
 # --- End-to-end HTTP sanity ------------------------------------------------
@@ -685,5 +689,129 @@ class TestResolvedRoutesPayload(unittest.TestCase):
             _handler(None)._resolved_routes_payload()
 
 
+class TestNonBlockingSupervise(unittest.TestCase):
+    """PRD prd-new / issue #412: pending responses carry the proposal id, and
+    `check-proposal` polls a queued proposal without blocking or re-proposing."""
+
+    _ROUTES = "routes:\n  - host: example.com\n"
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix="supervise-nonblock-test.")
+        self._home_patch = use_bottle_root(Path(self._tmp.name) / ".bot-bottle")
+        self.config = ServerConfig(bottle_slug="dev")
+        _qs.QueueStore("dev").migrate()
+        _as.AuditStore().migrate()
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        self._home_patch()
+        self._tmp.cleanup()
+
+    def _seed_proposal(self) -> "_sv.Proposal":
+        p = _sv.Proposal.new(
+            bottle_slug="dev",
+            tool=_sv.TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW,
+            proposed_file=self._ROUTES,
+            justification="need example.com",
+            current_file_hash=_sv.sha256_hex(self._ROUTES),
+        )
+        _sv.write_proposal(p)
+        return p
+
+    def _check(self, proposal_id: str) -> dict[str, object]:
+        return handle_check_proposal({"arguments": {"proposal_id": proposal_id}}, self.config)
+
+    # --- pending response carries the id ---
+
+    def test_pending_text_includes_id_and_pointer(self):
+        text = format_pending_response_text("abc-123", 30.0)
+        self.assertIn("status: pending", text)
+        self.assertIn("proposal_id: abc-123", text)
+        self.assertIn("check-proposal", text)
+
+    def test_tools_call_timeout_returns_pending_with_id_and_stays_queued(self):
+        # No responder → the grace window expires → pending, not blocked forever.
+        result = handle_tools_call(
+            {
+                "name": _sv.TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW,
+                "arguments": {"routes_yaml": self._ROUTES, "justification": "x"},
+            },
+            ServerConfig(bottle_slug="dev", response_timeout_seconds=0.05),
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["isError"])  # type: ignore[index]
+        text = result["content"][0]["text"]  # type: ignore[index]
+        self.assertIn("status: pending", text)
+        pending = _sv.list_pending_proposals("dev")
+        self.assertEqual(1, len(pending))  # still queued, not archived
+        self.assertIn(pending[0].id, text)  # agent got the id to poll
+
+    # --- check-proposal poll ---
+
+    def test_check_returns_approved_and_archives(self):
+        p = self._seed_proposal()
+        _sv.write_response("dev", _sv.Response(proposal_id=p.id, status=_sv.STATUS_APPROVED, notes="ok"))
+        result = self._check(p.id)
+        self.assertFalse(result["isError"])
+        text = result["content"][0]["text"]  # type: ignore[index]
+        self.assertIn("status: approved", text)
+        self.assertIn("notes: ok", text)
+        with self.assertRaises(FileNotFoundError):  # archived on read
+            _sv.read_proposal("dev", p.id)
+
+    def test_check_rejected_sets_isError(self):
+        p = self._seed_proposal()
+        _sv.write_response("dev", _sv.Response(proposal_id=p.id, status=_sv.STATUS_REJECTED, notes="no"))
+        result = self._check(p.id)
+        self.assertTrue(result["isError"])
+        self.assertIn("status: rejected", result["content"][0]["text"])  # type: ignore[index]
+
+    def test_check_pending_when_no_decision_yet(self):
+        p = self._seed_proposal()
+        result = self._check(p.id)
+        self.assertFalse(result["isError"])
+        text = result["content"][0]["text"]  # type: ignore[index]
+        self.assertIn("status: pending", text)
+        self.assertIn(p.id, text)
+        self.assertEqual(1, len(_sv.list_pending_proposals("dev")))  # not archived
+
+    def test_check_unknown_id_is_error(self):
+        result = self._check("no-such-proposal")
+        self.assertTrue(result["isError"])
+        self.assertIn("status: unknown", result["content"][0]["text"])  # type: ignore[index]
+
+    def test_check_missing_id_raises(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(_RpcClientError) as cm:
+            handle_check_proposal({"arguments": {}}, self.config)
+        self.assertEqual(ERR_INVALID_PARAMS, cm.exception.code)
+
+    def test_check_empty_id_raises(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(_RpcClientError) as cm:
+            handle_check_proposal({"arguments": {"proposal_id": "   "}}, self.config)
+        self.assertEqual(ERR_INVALID_PARAMS, cm.exception.code)
+
+    def test_check_arguments_must_be_object(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(_RpcClientError) as cm:
+            handle_check_proposal({"arguments": []}, self.config)
+        self.assertEqual(ERR_INVALID_PARAMS, cm.exception.code)
+
+    def test_full_nonblocking_round_trip(self):
+        # 1. tools/call times out → pending with id
+        result = handle_tools_call(
+            {
+                "name": _sv.TOOL_EGRESS_ALLOW,
+                "arguments": {"routes_yaml": self._ROUTES, "justification": "x"},
+            },
+            ServerConfig(bottle_slug="dev", response_timeout_seconds=0.05),
+        )
+        pid = _sv.list_pending_proposals("dev")[0].id
+        self.assertIn(pid, result["content"][0]["text"])  # type: ignore[index]
+        # 2. operator decides out-of-band
+        _sv.write_response("dev", _sv.Response(proposal_id=pid, status=_sv.STATUS_APPROVED, notes="ok"))
+        # 3. agent resumes by polling — no re-proposing
+        poll = self._check(pid)
+        self.assertFalse(poll["isError"])
+        self.assertIn("status: approved", poll["content"][0]["text"])  # type: ignore[index]
+        self.assertEqual([], _sv.list_pending_proposals("dev"))  # resolved + archived
+
+
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()

tests/unit/test_tracker_policy.py

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import Mock
+
+from scripts.tracker_policy import (
+    TRIAGE_LABEL,
+    check_pull_request,
+    deliberate_issue_numbers,
+    ensure_issue_label,
+)
+
+
+class TestDeliberateIssueNumbers(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_accepts_completing_and_noncompleting_forms(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            deliberate_issue_numbers("Fixes #12", "Part of #14; refs #15"),
+            {12, 14, 15},
+        )
+
+    def test_does_not_treat_incidental_number_as_link(self):
+        self.assertEqual(deliberate_issue_numbers("Audit #12", "See PR #14"), set())
+
+
+class TestCheckPullRequest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_accepts_unlabelled_pr_linked_to_real_issue(self):
+        api = Mock()
+        api.request.return_value = {"number": 12, "pull_request": None}
+        event = {"pull_request": {"title": "Change", "body": "Part of #12", "labels": []}}
+        self.assertEqual(check_pull_request(event, api), [])
+
+    def test_rejects_labels_and_pr_reference(self):
+        api = Mock()
+        api.request.return_value = {"number": 12, "pull_request": {}}
+        event = {
+            "pull_request": {
+                "title": "Change",
+                "body": "Closes #12",
+                "labels": [{"name": "Kind/Bug"}],
+            }
+        }
+        errors = check_pull_request(event, api)
+        self.assertEqual(len(errors), 2)
+        self.assertIn("unlabeled", errors[0])
+        self.assertIn("not an issue", errors[1])
+
+
+class TestEnsureIssueLabel(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_adds_triage_label_to_unlabelled_issue(self):
+        api = Mock()
+        api.request.side_effect = [[{"id": 55, "name": TRIAGE_LABEL}], None]
+        event = {"issue": {"number": 405, "labels": [], "pull_request": None}}
+        self.assertTrue(ensure_issue_label(event, api))
+        api.request.assert_any_call("POST", "/issues/405/labels", {"labels": [55]})
+
+    def test_leaves_labelled_issue_unchanged(self):
+        api = Mock()
+        event = {"issue": {"number": 405, "labels": [{"name": "Kind/Documentation"}]}}
+        self.assertFalse(ensure_issue_label(event, api))
+        api.request.assert_not_called()
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()