Commit Graph

73 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
didericis 9cd583fbbb feat(egress-proxy): retarget remediation at egress-proxy (PRD 0017 chunk 3)
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 19s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
Finishes PRD 0017. The `cred-proxy-block` MCP tool is renamed and
its remediation apply path is repointed at egress-proxy.

  - `claude_bottle/supervise.py` — `TOOL_CRED_PROXY_BLOCK` →
    `TOOL_EGRESS_PROXY_BLOCK`; `COMPONENT_FOR_TOOL` maps the new
    tool ID to `egress-proxy` for audit-log routing.

  - `claude_bottle/supervise_server.py` — tool definition renamed
    + description rewritten: "Call when egress-proxy refused your
    HTTPS request ... Read the current routes.yaml from /etc/
    claude-bottle/current-config/routes.yaml, compose a modified
    version, pass the full new file plus a justification." The
    syntactic validator dispatches on the new tool ID.

  - `claude_bottle/backend/docker/egress_proxy_apply.py` — renamed
    from `cred_proxy_apply.py`. Reads routes.yaml from
    /etc/egress-proxy/routes.yaml via `docker exec cat`; validates
    via `egress_proxy_addon_core.load_routes` (so both sides use
    the same parser); writes via `docker cp`; SIGHUPs egress-proxy
    with `docker kill --signal HUP`. `EgressProxyApplyError`
    replaces `CredProxyApplyError`.

  - `claude_bottle/cli/dashboard.py` — wires the new apply +
    `discover_egress_proxy_slugs` helper; the operator-initiated
    `routes edit <bottle>` verb now writes to egress-proxy with
    `.yaml` suffix. Stale follow-up comment about path-aware
    filtering removed — PRD 0017 settled that question.

  - `tests/integration/test_supervise_sidecar.py` — restores the
    approval round-trip test (chunk 2 had switched it to a reject
    path because no cred-proxy existed). Approval stubs
    `apply_routes_change` so the test focuses on the supervise
    queue/response plumbing rather than docker-exec into a real
    egress-proxy sidecar (that's covered separately).

  - `tests/unit/test_egress_proxy_apply.py` — rewritten against
    the new validator; covers JSON shape, missing routes key,
    partial-auth-pair rejection (the addon-core parser catches
    these before SIGHUP).

  - PRDs 0010 + 0014 — status headers updated to
    Superseded / Retargeted with a callout block pointing at PRD
    0017's migration section. Historical text preserved.

384 unit + integration tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 15:13:44 -04:00
didericis a79b2b7be0 docs(prd-0017): nest auth.scheme + auth.token_ref under optional auth
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
Earlier draft had `auth_scheme: "none"` as the unauthenticated
signal — awkward sentinel. Nest the two credential-injection
fields under an optional `auth` key instead. Presence of the key
= authenticated; absence = unauthenticated. Empty `auth: {}` is
an error (omission is what means "no auth").

Touches: scope bullet, manifest example, mitmproxy addon
description's auth-handling step. Two trailing `auth_scheme:
"none"` references kept as historical context for what the new
shape replaces.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 13:35:47 -04:00
didericis b0d9802469 docs(prd-0017): pivot to mitmproxy-based egress-proxy
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
Significant rewrite of PRD 0017 based on PR #25 design discussion.

Original draft proposed adding `path_allowlist` to the existing
cred-proxy. That bought opt-in path filtering for tools that
voluntarily routed through cred-proxy (Claude Code, git, npm) —
but raw `curl https://github.com/foo` from the agent goes to
HTTPS_PROXY=pipelock and bypasses cred-proxy entirely, so any
universal enforcement claim was a lie.

New design: replace cred-proxy with a mitmproxy-based egress-proxy
that becomes the agent's HTTP_PROXY/HTTPS_PROXY. Every agent
HTTP/HTTPS request flows through it before reaching pipelock.
Path-level allow/deny enforcement is universal because the proxy
is on every leg. The proxy also absorbs cred-proxy's credential
injection role (mitmproxy addon hooks request → strip + inject
Authorization).

Net sidecar count: unchanged. cred-proxy is replaced 1:1 by
egress-proxy. Pipelock stays as hostname allow + DLP downstream
of egress-proxy.

Decisions baked in per PR-#25 discussion:
- Tool: mitmproxy (designed for this; Python addons; well-maintained).
- CA custody: egress-proxy holds the per-bottle MITM CA key
  (concentration accepted; documented in trust-domain section).
- Migration: hard cutover. Existing `bottle.cred_proxy.routes[]`
  manifests fail-fast at load time with a pointer at this PRD.

Open questions retained for the implementation PRs: addon
distribution (bake vs mount), prefix-vs-glob match, double-strip
of Authorization between egress-proxy and pipelock, whether
pipelock keeps TLS interception or stays hostname-only post-cutover,
performance under two-MITM-hops.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 13:28:53 -04:00
didericis 5b925a6699 docs(prd-0017): path-aware egress filtering via cred-proxy
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 17s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
Extends cred-proxy to filter (not just route) paths, including for
unauthenticated upstreams via a new `auth_scheme: "none"` mode and
`path_allowlist` field per route. Pipelock keeps its hostname
allowlist + DLP role; cred-proxy adds path-level enforcement for
routes that opt in.

Motivated by PR #25's follow-up note in _apply_pipelock_url: pipelock
2.3.0's api_allowlist is hostname-only, so approving pipelock-block
opens the entire host. For shared platforms (github.com, gitlab.com,
public registries) operators usually want narrower-than-host
granularity.

Draft status; open questions on match semantics, allow-route-with-
empty-allowlist edge case, and the eventual MCP tool shape for
agent-proposed path additions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 08:33:01 -04:00
didericis 5e8ca21669 docs: replace stale bash-first framing with Python-stdlib-first
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 16s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m32s
The project started life as bash scripts and got rewritten to Python
(documented in docs/research/bash-vs-python-vs-go.md). Several docs
still carried the old "bash-first" framing — misleading for anyone
reading them now (8.7k lines of Python vs. ~130 lines of bash, all
in scripts/demo*.sh).

- CLAUDE.md "What this is" + "Conventions": orchestrator is Python,
  posture is stdlib-first.
- docs/prds/0010-cred-proxy.md, docs/research/manifest-format-and-
  grouping.md: quoted CLAUDE.md's old wording — re-quote.
- docs/research/built-in-supervisor-design.md, landscape-containerized-
  claude.md, agent-sandbox-landscape.md, pipelock-assessment.md,
  network-egress-guard.md: drop "bash-first" claims about the project,
  keep accurate descriptions of external tools' bash usage.

Leaves untouched: bash code-fence syntax in examples, README's
literal `bash scripts/demo.sh` invocation (the demo IS bash),
Claude Code's "Bash tool" references, IVIJL/devbox bash description
(that project actually is bash), and the bash-vs-python-vs-go
research note that records the rewrite decision.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 06:32:42 -04:00
didericis de87f21ff8 docs(prd-0016): capability block remediation
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 17s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
Adds PRD 0016, the heaviest of the three remediation engines in the
stuck-agent recovery flow (overview in PRD 0012, foundation in PRD
0013). Wires the capability block path: rebuild orchestrator,
state-preservation helper, capability-block end-to-end. On approval
the orchestrator tears down the bottle, builds from the new
Dockerfile, and starts a replacement on the same branch via
state-preservation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 05:15:32 -04:00
didericis 0197599e49 docs(prd-0015): pipelock block remediation
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 17s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Adds PRD 0015, the second remediation engine in the stuck-agent
recovery flow (overview in PRD 0012, foundation in PRD 0013). Wires
the pipelock block path with restart-based reload: supervisor writes
the new allowlist on approval and restarts pipelock, proactive
pipelock edit TUI verb, pipelock audit log filled in. SIGHUP reload
for pipelock is deferred to a follow-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:54:25 -04:00
didericis 76a9bd2586 docs(prd-0014): cred-proxy block remediation
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 17s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 45s
Adds PRD 0014, the first end-to-end remediation engine in the
stuck-agent recovery flow (overview in PRD 0012, foundation in PRD
0013). Wires the cred-proxy block path: SIGHUP-based hot reload of
routes.json on cred-proxy, supervisor write-on-approval, proactive
routes edit TUI verb, cred-proxy audit log filled in.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:37:09 -04:00
didericis 578363bea3 docs(prd-0013): supervise plane foundation
Adds PRD 0013, the shared foundation for the stuck-agent recovery flow
(overview in PRD 0012). Defines the MCP sidecar, the three tool
definitions, the proposal queue, the read-only current-config mount,
the minimal TUI, and the audit log format. Approval handlers are
deliberately no-ops; the actual remediations land in PRDs 0014, 0015,
and 0016.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:20:57 -04:00
didericis 4079678ceb docs(prd-0012): split into overview + 4 implementation PRDs
test / unit (push) Successful in 13s
test / integration (push) Successful in 22s
PRD 0012 becomes the cross-cutting overview (stuck categories taxonomy,
sidecar-vs-in-container rationale, implementation chunk pointers).
Implementation detail moves into four follow-on PRDs that 0012
references: 0013 (supervise plane foundation), 0014 (cred-proxy block
remediation), 0015 (pipelock block remediation), 0016 (capability
block remediation).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis 58acdcac87 docs(prd-0012): explain why the MCP server is a sidecar, not in-container
Captures the rationale for placing the MCP server outside the agent
container. The bottle wall doesn't strictly require it (the operator
TUI is the actual gate), but pattern consistency, audit metadata
trust, connection lifecycle, future enforcement headroom, and
pipelock cleanliness all argue for sidecar placement.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis 6e4bb3ba8d docs(prd-0012): switch /stuck to three structured MCP tool calls
Replaces the text-only /supervise/notify protocol with three MCP tools
the agent calls directly: cred-proxy-block, pipelock-block, and
capability-block. Each tool carries the agent's proposed config file
(routes.json, pipelock allowlist, or Dockerfile) plus a justification.
Adds a new MCP sidecar, a read-only current-config mount in the agent
container, and renames "capability gap" to "capability block" to match
the tool name. The text-only-vs-structured tradeoff is captured as an
Open question with pros/cons on both sides.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis 66fc29c72e docs(prd-0012): name the three stuck categories and add pipelock path
Introduces cred-proxy block, pipelock block, and capability gap as the
three named categories of stuck. Adds pipelock-edit support (restart-
based for v1) parallel to the existing cred-proxy routes-edit path,
plus a pipelock audit log. Broadens Goals to cover all three paths.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis a6222aaa57 docs(prd-0012): adopt text-only notify protocol + SIGHUP routes reload
Rewrites Scope, Proposed Design, Data model, and Open questions to
match the model where /supervise/notify is text-in/text-out, routes
edits + SIGHUP reload are supervisor-side tooling, and manifest
rebuilds are the heavy path. Adds the per-bottle routes-edit audit log.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis 4cce535008 docs(research): drop auto-respawn from the supervisor design
The autonomous "review comment → respawn bottle with comment as
next prompt" loop is the one feature that opens a prompt-injection
vector the bottle wall can't close (a public commenter would get
to issue instructions inside the agent's perimeter on every
launch). The available mitigations — commenter allowlists,
prompt-injection regex screens, private-repo defaults — are all
soft. The durable defense is to keep the human between the
review comment and any next agent prompt.

So `supervise` is now strictly notify-only. The `auto_respawn`
manifest field, the "with auto_respawn: true" behavior paragraph,
and the matching trust-model edge case all go. The reasoning
stays in the "Where to be conservative" bullet so the decision
isn't re-litigated later.
2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis afbb77b040 docs(research): built-in supervisor design (TUI + PR feedback) 2026-05-25 04:19:50 -04:00
didericis 1f9722ae27 docs(research): add Betterleaks switching analysis
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 28s
2026-05-24 23:59:42 -04:00
didericis c33930290f docs(research): survey gitleaks dashboards + add baseline-file primitive
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 24s
2026-05-24 23:54:46 -04:00
didericis a74dd2b97f docs: research on git-gate commit approval; link from PRD 0012
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
2026-05-24 23:39:17 -04:00
didericis 83756fa8c9 docs(prd-0012): open question for gitlock/pipelock exception flow
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
2026-05-24 23:12:55 -04:00
didericis b4c9e149b0 docs: add PRD 0012 — stuck-agent recovery flow
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
2026-05-24 23:10:30 -04:00
didericis afa8ca67a4 docs(prd-0011): drop the migration command requirement
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 23s
claude-bottle has a single primary user today; an automated
JSON → MD migration tool is overkill. Hand-rewriting one file
is the migration cost. The resolver still dies with a pointer
at the README's manifest section if a stale claude-bottle.json
is found alongside no .claude-bottle/ directory, so the breaking
change isn't silent.

Drops: SC #6 (migration tool), the "Migration command" In Scope
sub-bullet, the migrate_manifest.py / cli wiring entries from
Existing code touched, the tests/integration/test_migrate_manifest.py
entry from Tests, the destructive-vs-additive open question.
Renumbers the remaining success criteria 6, 7 (formerly 7, 8).
Backward-compat section rewritten around hand-rewrite.
2026-05-24 21:46:22 -04:00
didericis 894bdea288 docs: add PRD 0011 — per-file Markdown manifest
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Specs the implementation chosen in the PR #16 closing comment:
per-file MD-with-YAML-frontmatter layout for both bottles and
agents, with a hand-rolled YAML subset parser (no PyYAML).

Layout:
- $HOME/.claude-bottle/bottles/<name>.md   (home-only)
- $HOME/.claude-bottle/agents/<name>.md    (home agents)
- $CWD/.claude-bottle/agents/<name>.md     (repo-supplied agents)

The trust boundary that PRD-0011-v1 (closed PR #15) tried to
enforce in the resolver now falls out of filesystem layout —
$CWD/.claude-bottle/ has no bottles/ subdir, the loader doesn't
look there. Filesystem layout IS the enforcement.

Eight success criteria, including: stdlib-only (no new runtime
dep), idempotent migration command, agent files shaped close to
Claude Code's existing subagent spec so the same file can drop
into ~/.claude/agents/.

PRD-only; no implementation in this commit. PRD slot 0011 is
intentionally reused — the v1 file was never merged to main.
2026-05-24 21:39:58 -04:00
didericis da969a503d docs(research): manifest format + grouping options
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Captures the two open questions surfaced by PRD 0011: should bottles and agents stay grouped in one file or split per file, and should the format stay JSON or move to YAML / MD-with-frontmatter.

Recommends per-file MD-with-frontmatter (with agents shaped close to Claude Code's subagent spec so they can drop into ~/.claude/agents/ as a side effect), explicitly flags the PyYAML runtime dependency as a user-decision crossing the project's "low deps by default" line, and leaves several other choices (hidden dotdir vs visible, migration tooling) as open questions.

Companion to docs/prds/0011-cwd-manifest-trust-boundary.md (which solves the trust problem at the resolver layer); this doc explores a structural alternative that would make the boundary self-documenting on disk.
2026-05-24 21:12:43 -04:00
didericis 32b62cbacc feat(cred_proxy)!: cred-proxy is the only Anthropic auth path
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 23s
Removes the legacy `CLAUDE_BOTTLE_OAUTH_TOKEN` -> `CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN`
forward in prepare.py. Bottles that need claude-code to authenticate
must declare a cred_proxy route with role: "anthropic-base-url" — there
is no fallback that hands the token to the agent directly.

Drops the now-dead BottleSpec.forward_oauth_token field, the CLI
setter that read CLAUDE_BOTTLE_OAUTH_TOKEN from the host env at
prepare time, and the forward_oauth_token=False arg in the six
pipelock integration tests.

PRD 0010 and README updated; the dev ~/claude-bottle.json gains an
anthropic-base-url route so the implementer/researcher agents keep
working.

BREAKING: bottles previously relying on the implicit OAuth forward
will now produce an agent environ without any Anthropic credential.
Verified with --dry-run: a bottle with no anthropic-base-url route
yields env_names: [] (no token at all); a bottle that declares the
route yields ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL plus a non-secret placeholder for
CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN.
2026-05-24 12:56:09 -04:00
didericis fcbbc4484d refactor(cred_proxy): flat routes, role-driven provisioning (PRD 0010)
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Replace bottle.tokens (with Kind enum and hardcoded per-kind
route/auth tables) with bottle.cred_proxy.routes — each route
declares its own path, upstream, auth_scheme, token_ref, and
optional role[]. The manifest is now the source of truth for the
proxy's runtime route table; adding an upstream is a manifest edit,
not a code change.

Agent-side rewrites move from per-kind dispatch to per-role tags
on routes:
  anthropic-base-url -> set ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=<proxy><path>
  npm-registry       -> write ~/.npmrc registry=
  git-insteadof      -> write ~/.gitconfig [url] insteadOf, keyed
                        off route.upstream (suppressed when
                        bottle.git brokers the same host)
  tea-login          -> add a ~/.config/tea/config.yml login

Roles are a list (string accepted as sugar). A gitea route
typically carries ["git-insteadof", "tea-login"]. Singleton roles
(anthropic-base-url, npm-registry) appear on at most one route.

token_env slots are assigned per distinct TokenRef in declaration
order — two routes sharing a token_ref (e.g. github API + git
endpoints) share a slot.

Drops: TOKEN_KINDS, _KIND_ROUTES, _KIND_AUTH_SCHEME, _TOKEN_DEFAULT_HOST,
cred_proxy_route_path_for_gitea, the kind field on CredProxyUpstream,
and the kind-based hardcoding in pipelock_token_hosts (now derives
from route.UpstreamHost).

Legacy bottle.tokens manifests now die with a hint pointing at
bottle.cred_proxy.routes + this PRD. Tests rewritten end-to-end.
Docs + example.json + the dev ~/claude-bottle.json updated to match.
2026-05-13 21:49:55 -04:00
didericis 27b2d78b11 fix(cred_proxy): close git-push bypass + route through pipelock (PRD 0010)
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Three coupled fixes that close a documented bypass of git-gate's
gitleaks pre-receive hook:

1. cred-proxy refuses git smart-HTTP push at runtime. Any path
   ending in /git-receive-pack or /info/refs?service=git-receive-pack
   returns 403 with a pointer at the bottle.git SSH path. Fetch
   (upload-pack) is still allowed — the bypass we're closing is
   push, where gitleaks is the load-bearing scanner. Hard guarantee.

2. The provisioner suppresses the cred-proxy `~/.gitconfig` insteadOf
   rewrite for any host already declared in bottle.git. git-gate is
   the canonical git path there; we don't write a competing rule
   that would let `git clone https://<host>/...` succeed in ways
   that confuse on push. Defense in depth — (1) is the hard guarantee.

3. cred-proxy routes its outbound HTTPS through pipelock. The
   sidecar's environ now sets HTTPS_PROXY=<pipelock-url>, and the
   image's entrypoint runs `update-ca-certificates` over the
   per-bottle pipelock CA (docker cp'd into
   /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/pipelock.crt before start) so
   the proxy's HTTPS client trusts pipelock's bumped certs.

   Consequence: pipelock's allowlist + body scanner now sit in the
   cred-proxy egress path the same way they sit in front of direct
   agent traffic. The cred-proxy upstream hosts (api.github.com,
   github.com, gitea hosts, registry.npmjs.org) come OFF
   pipelock's passthrough_domains. Only api.anthropic.com remains
   on passthrough (LLM body content legitimately trips DLP).

PRD 0010 updated to reflect all three. Tests adjusted: the
"cred-proxy hosts go on passthrough" assertion in
test_pipelock_allowlist flips to "they don't", a new
TestIsGitPushRequest exercises the smart-HTTP refusal predicate,
and the gitconfig renderer tests cover the per-host suppression
matrix.
2026-05-13 21:09:33 -04:00
didericis c8ab90d01d fix(manifest): allow token + git on the same host (PRD 0010)
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 22s
git-gate holds an SSH IdentityFile for push/fetch; cred-proxy holds
a PAT for HTTPS REST API calls. The two brokers are orthogonal —
the common dev setup names both on the same host (e.g. gitea.dideric.is
SSH for push, gitea.dideric.is PAT for `tea pr create`).

The original PRD 0010 wording called this a "configuration smell"
and rejected it at parse time. That was wrong; this drops the
overlap rejection from the validator and updates the PRD prose to
match. Tests flip from "rejection" to "coexistence" assertions.
2026-05-13 16:38:36 -04:00
didericis 9fa9717135 docs: switch cred-proxy to sidecar shape
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 27s
Make the cred-proxy a per-bottle sidecar container on the bottle's
internal docker network instead of a root-owned process inside the
agent container. The boundary becomes container namespace
separation, matching pipelock and git-gate. Update summary,
problem, goals, in-scope, architecture diagram, components,
existing code touched, external deps, and open questions; add a
"Considered alternatives" section recording the rejected
in-container shape.
2026-05-13 15:35:38 -04:00
didericis 3747927b9e docs: align cred-proxy architecture diagram
Trim one trailing space from the four arrow/HTTPS rows and add
one dash to the bottle-container bottom edge so all box-bound
lines are 68 columns.
2026-05-13 15:35:37 -04:00
didericis 1411719973 docs: add PRD 0010 for credential proxy
Per-bottle reverse proxy that holds API tokens (Anthropic OAuth,
GitHub PAT, Gitea PAT, npm) in a root-owned process; agent gets
only URLs in its environ. AWS / SigV4 explicitly out of scope.
2026-05-13 15:35:37 -04:00
didericis 3f4708f970 docs(demo): add end-to-end demo with recorded GIF
test / unit (push) Successful in 22s
test / integration (push) Successful in 31s
Squashes the demo-build arc: initial GIF + scripts, refactor to drive
recording through real cli.py, theme/timing tweaks, and the switch to
prompt-driven probes.
2026-05-13 15:33:28 -04:00
didericis 30d92bef48 docs: drop ssh from README/example, supersede PRD 0007 (PRD 0009)
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 21s
- README architecture diagram drops the socat/ssh image box and
  the agent's ~/.ssh/config; the prose-bullets section drops the
  ssh image; the manifest example swaps `ssh:` for `git:` so
  someone copy-pasting it picks up the new shape.
- claude-bottle.example.json: `default` bottle's `"ssh": []` is
  gone (now just an empty bottle); the gitea-dev example already
  uses `git:` since the ExtraHosts work.
- PRD 0007 carries a "Superseded by PRD 0009" header at the top
  with a one-paragraph block explaining why; the file stays so
  the rationale of the prior design is still in-tree.
- git_gate.py: drop the now-stale shadow-route mention from a
  docstring (the validator went away in the manifest layer).
2026-05-12 23:57:50 -04:00
didericis efcafae810 docs(prds): add PRD 0009 to remove ssh-gate and bottle.ssh
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 34s
ssh-gate was built for non-git SSH (PRD 0007), but every
upstream currently declared in any bottle is a git remote, and
those now flow through git-gate (PRD 0008) with credential
isolation, gitleaks scanning, and `insteadOf` URL rewrites.
ssh-gate is left doing L4 forwarding with no gating value over
git-gate's path; carrying it means a redundant sidecar lifecycle,
a shadow-route validator between bottle.ssh and bottle.git, and
a third place to keep an SSH identity in sync.

Goal is straightforward deletion: bottle.ssh becomes a parse
error pointing at bottle.git, the SshEntry / SSHGate / socat
provisioner / pipelock allowlist branch all go away, and PRD
0007 carries a "Superseded by PRD 0009" header so the rationale
of the prior design stays in the tree.
2026-05-12 23:34:11 -04:00
didericis 00649d27e9 docs(research): add credential-proxy landscape and DLP-minimization framing
test / unit (push) Successful in 14s
test / integration (push) Successful in 29s
Consolidates oauth-token-exposure-to-claude.md and
tea-token-isolation-via-proxy.md into agent-credential-proxy-landscape.md,
adding a May-2026 survey of existing tools (Docker AI Sandboxes,
Cloudflare Sandbox Auth, Infisical Agent Vault, nono, Aembit, LiteLLM
CVE-2026-42208, Portkey, Helicone, etc.) and a build-vs-adopt verdict.

Adds secret-minimization-over-dlp.md explaining why pipelock's body
DLP and gitleaks's pre-receive scan cannot stop encoding/splitting
exfil, and why moving credentials out of the bottle (the git-gate
pattern, generalized) is the only robust answer.

Updates git-secret-scanning-hardening.md's reference to point at
the new consolidated landscape doc.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 23:25:12 -04:00
didericis 9b7bcc0149 docs(git-gate): document ExtraHosts on bottle.git entries
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 19s
- example manifest swaps the gitea-dev bottle from ssh: to git:
  and shows ExtraHosts pinning gitea.dideric.is to its Tailscale IP
- README's git-gate paragraph names the field and the case it
  solves (upstream resolvable on the host but not from the gate
  container's default DNS)
- PRD 0008's manifest-field bullet mentions the field for parity
2026-05-12 23:18:46 -04:00
didericis ae7e22065f docs(prds): expand PRD 0008 to bidirectional mirror scope
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 11s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 18s
The gate now fronts every git operation, not just push. Fetch
(clone, pull, ls-remote) is mirrored via git daemon's
--access-hook running 'git fetch origin --prune' against the
real upstream before each upload-pack; fail-closed if upstream
is unreachable so the agent never serves stale data.

Push path is unchanged in concept (gitleaks gate → forward) but
the hook now pushes to 'origin' rather than 'upstream', matching
the remote name the entrypoint configures.
2026-05-12 21:26:19 -04:00
didericis c91395425c docs(prds): add PRD 0008 git gate
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Per-bottle sidecar that fronts the agent's git remotes, runs
gitleaks via a pre-receive hook, and only forwards to the real
upstream on a clean scan. Upstream push credentials live in the
gate, not the agent — so a misbehaving agent cannot push a
secret-bearing commit past it.
2026-05-12 18:24:33 -04:00
didericis 96d2c7b7a1 docs(research): add note on git secret-scanning as defense-in-depth
test / unit (push) Successful in 12s
test / integration (push) Successful in 15s
Threat-models the case where a credential ends up in a tracked
file and is git-pushed to a public remote — the secret is
compromised the instant the push lands (events API, scrapers),
not at merge time. Recommends gitleaks as the smallest-blast-
radius layer to add: Go binary, MIT, offline, scans full history,
hookable from the existing .githooks/.

No code or workflow change; just the research note.
2026-05-12 16:24:06 -04:00
didericis a3d77cd015 fix(ssh-gate): listen on the upstream port so URL-supplied ports work
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 12s
Bug: git fetch failed with "connect to host
claude-bottle-ssh-gate-implementer port 30009: Connection refused".
OpenSSH treats a URL-supplied port (the user's remote was
ssh://git@gitea.dideric.is:30009/...) as overriding the
~/.ssh/config Port directive, so even though the config wrote
Port 30000 the agent dialed :30009 — where nothing was listening
because the gate had been assigned BASE_LISTEN_PORT + index.

Fix: the gate's listen port now equals the upstream port. Same
script, same socat, just port = entry.Port. Two entries on the
same upstream port are rejected at prepare time (the gate is one
container with a flat port space).

Re-smoked: probe nc github.com via the gate at :22, banner came
back as expected.

PRD 0007 updated to record the design refinement.
2026-05-12 16:19:07 -04:00
didericis b2927b1483 docs(prd): note gate image must be self-sufficient at boot on 0007
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 13s
The gate's agent-facing leg sits on the `--internal` network, so
the forwarder image cannot rely on apk/apt at startup. Surfaced
by the DNS spike — a placeholder using `apk add socat` died
silently and gave a false-negative DNS-on-internal result.
2026-05-12 15:50:34 -04:00
didericis cb0f0f133d docs(prd): resolve gate-DNS open question on 0007
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Spike: container on a `--internal` user-defined network resolves
another container's name via the embedded resolver at 127.0.0.11
and reaches it over TCP, while egress to the public internet
remains blocked. The PRD's design assumption holds — no design
change needed.
2026-05-12 15:48:55 -04:00
didericis 02a0fe679d docs(prd): 0007 SSH egress gate
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 15s
PRD 0006 enabled pipelock's native TLS interception, which broke
git fetch over SSH from inside the agent: pipelock's SNI gate
rejects the SSH banner that follows CONNECT. Document the
architectural fix — a dedicated per-agent TCP-forwarder sidecar
built from bottle.ssh entries — so pipelock can stay maximally
strict on the HTTPS path with no SSH carve-outs.
2026-05-12 15:41:26 -04:00
didericis f44e884d8a docs(prd): fold 0006 walkthrough resolutions into the design
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 15s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 14s
After the open-question walkthrough, all four collapsed:

- Q1 (mount semantics): resolved to `docker cp` between
  `docker create` and `docker start`, mirroring the existing
  pipelock YAML handling. No bind mount, no UID/permission
  concern. Folded into §Proposed Design > CA lifecycle as
  "Sidecar install".
- Q2 (cert validity / TTL): pre-decided in the question text.
  Per-bottle ephemerality is enforced by regenerating per launch,
  not by short validity windows. Pipelock's defaults are fine.
  Folded into §Proposed Design as a one-line "Per-bottle
  ephemerality" note.
- Q3 (`passthrough_domains` shape): not v1 scope; the shape is
  pre-recorded so the follow-up is mechanical. Moved into
  §Out of scope.
- Q4 (stage-dir cleanup ordering): reading start.py confirmed
  the ExitStack-then-outer-finally order is correct. Folded into
  §Proposed Design as a "Teardown" note.

The §Open questions section is dropped. None of the four was a
real design question — they were verifications and pre-decided
items left in for defensiveness.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 14:22:59 -04:00
didericis 6716f091c1 docs(prd): add 0006, enable pipelock's native TLS interception
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Supersedes the abandoned PR #8 (`mitmproxy-tls-interception`),
which built a mitmproxy + addon chain on the (falsified) premise
that pipelock could not MITM. Empirical proof from the impl-time
spike: with `tls_interception: { enabled: true, ca_cert, ca_key }`
in pipelock's config, pipelock answered a credential POST over
HTTPS with `STATUS=403 / body: blocked: request body contains
secret: GitHub Token` and emitted both `scanner:"tls_intercept"`
and `scanner:"body_dlp"` events. Standalone, no second proxy.

Net change vs PR #8: one sidecar instead of two, no vendored
addon, no addon-verdict pattern matching, no HTTPS-trust /
DNS / lookup workarounds. Same end-state behavior — pipelock's
DLP fires on plaintext for HTTPS hosts in the allowlist.

Also cleaning up the now-stale TLS-research notes:

- `docs/research/tls-mitm-for-pipelock.md` is removed. Its
  entire premise (mitmproxy in front of pipelock) is moot now
  that pipelock does the work natively. The mechanics of CONNECT
  bumping and the CA-lifecycle considerations it documented are
  the same as what pipelock implements; the PRD restates the
  parts that matter for the integration.
- `docs/research/pipelock-assessment.md` had two stale claims
  corrected: the "Pipelock does not perform TLS inspection (no
  CA trust injection)" line in §Scope gaps and the
  "no TLS termination" cell in the comparison table. Both now
  point at the `tls_interception` config and `pipelock tls`
  CLI instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 14:15:44 -04:00
didericis 8e261563dc docs(research): TLS interception topologies for pipelock content scanning
test / unit (push) Successful in 14s
test / integration (push) Failing after 13s
Survey of TLS-MITM tools (mitmproxy, Squid+ssl_bump, Go libraries) and
five candidate topologies for adding TLS termination to the egress path
so pipelock's DLP, subdomain-entropy, and MCP scanners can fire on
plaintext bodies. Recommends mitmproxy in front of pipelock for v1
with a per-bottle ephemeral CA.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 11:41:34 -04:00
didericis 45203e2cd6 docs(prd): add 0004 split out provisioners
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 12s
test / integration (pull_request) Successful in 13s
2026-05-11 19:36:39 -04:00
didericis b97807ac71 docs(research): evaluate smolmachines as VM backend
test / run tests/run_tests.py (push) Successful in 16s
Compares smolmachines against the six subsystems in
agent-vm-isolation.md. smolmachines replaces the microVM runtime,
network attachment (libkrun TSI with built-in DNS-over-vsock filter),
vsock control plane, and Python lifecycle wrapper. Pipelock stays;
disk-image story shifts to OCI + writable overlay. Recommends adopting
smolmachines as the macOS VM backend after smoke-testing TSI
passthrough to a host-side pipelock.
2026-05-11 16:32:04 -04:00
didericis aba9a823ba docs(research): document macOS agent VM isolation approach
Transcript-style notes on running an agent in a hardware-isolated
microVM on macOS. Covers Virtualization.framework / vfkit / libkrun
choices, hardware-isolation guarantees, driving VMs from Python
(subprocess or PyObjC), pipelock as the egress proxy, vsock for the
control channel, and egress enforcement via
VZFileHandleNetworkDeviceAttachment + gvisor-tap-vsock.
2026-05-11 16:31:40 -04:00
didericis 08159e1031 docs(research): survey AI-agent sandbox tools
test / run tests/run_tests.py (push) Successful in 19s
Compares claude-bottle to endo-familiar, litterbox, agent-safehouse,
matchlock, tilde.run, boxlite, microsandbox, and smolmachines. Covers
isolation primitive, locality, agent integration, network policy, and
maturity, and notes three borrowable ideas (per-use SSH confirmation,
in-flight secret injection, microVM backend) that fit the current
bash-first / local-Docker stance.
2026-05-11 15:56:23 -04:00