Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
didericis bb6f081b66 docs: correct two claims the live harness run disproved
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 11s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 15s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 2m24s
test / image-input-builds (pull_request) Successful in 45s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 24s
The PATH story was wrong in an instructive way. I said a Homebrew Python is on
PATH only because of a shell-profile line; on this host /etc/paths.d/homebrew
puts /opt/homebrew/bin on every login shell's PATH, fresh accounts included.
The stub still wins, because path_helper appends /etc/paths.d/* *after*
/etc/paths and /usr/bin is in the latter. Ordering, not absence, is what makes
bare `python3` the 3.9.6 stub — which is also why the versioned `python3.14`
candidate is the one that matched during the real run, rather than the
/opt/homebrew/bin/python3 fallback I expected.

The harness header also credited install.sh with writing a PATH line into the
login shell. It does not write one. The reset argument is unaffected (such a
line would live in the deleted home either way), but the claim was untrue.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
2026-07-27 00:59:09 -04:00
didericis e847d51a71 feat: add a one-shot test cycle to the macOS install harness
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 6s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 10s
`test` chains up -> run -> status -> down, which is the loop you actually want
when verifying a clean install. Three things make it more than a convenience
wrapper:

* It refuses to start against an existing account. A reused home is not a clean
  install, so testing one silently would defeat the harness.
* It tears the account down from an EXIT/INT trap armed the moment the account
  exists, so a failed run — or a Ctrl-C mid-install — still leaves the machine
  clean. BB_TEST_KEEP=1 opts out to poke at a failure.
* Its verdict is stricter than the installer's. install.sh exits 0 when it
  finishes but `doctor` reports unmet prerequisites, so "the installer
  succeeded" is not a useful assertion; `test` fails if the install fails, if
  bot-bottle never reached the new user's PATH, or if doctor is unhappy. That
  meant giving cmd_status a real exit status instead of swallowing doctor's.

Also fixes two bugs in `run`'s installer staging, by removing the staging
entirely and feeding install.sh in on stdin:

* `mktemp /tmp/bb-install.XXXXXX.sh` did not do what it looks like. BSD mktemp
  only substitutes trailing Xs, so every run wrote the *same* predictable path,
  as root, mode 644, in a world-writable directory.
* The cleanup only ran on the normal and failure returns, so an interrupted run
  leaked the file.

Piping on stdin sidesteps both: root opens the redirect before sudo drops
privileges, so the mode-700 home that motivated the staging is a non-issue,
there is no file to leak, and `sh -s` matches the documented `curl … | sh`
shape more closely than executing a staged copy did.

The command-level `exit 1`s become `return 1` so the steps compose under the
trap, and the "next, run this" hints are suppressed inside `test`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
2026-07-27 00:43:12 -04:00
didericis-claude fdec887beb feat: add macOS clean-install test harness
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 14s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Add scripts/macos-install-test.sh, a throwaway-user harness for exercising
install.sh the way a brand-new user would on macOS, plus the research note
that motivates the approach.

The harness has up/run/status/down/deep-reset subcommands. Because install.sh
writes only to the user home (pipx venv, ~/.bot-bottle, a PATH line) and never
installs the backend, deleting the account is a complete, deterministic reset
of the install surface. A disposable macOS VM can't stand in on M1/M2: the
Apple `container` backend needs Virtualization.framework, and running it inside
a guest VM requires nested virtualization (M3+ only), so a throwaway user is
the only way to reach the real host backend from a clean $HOME.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 03:48:39 +00:00