Addresses review on #519 (@didericis 6143 + the fail-hard direction over the
codex skip).
Base owns the flow (6143 / ADR 0006). `attach_bottled_agents_to_gateway()` is
now a concrete method on `BottleBackend` that delegates to
`gateway_attach.reconcile_running_bottles`; backends override only three
primitives — `_gateway_attach_resources()`, `_running_bottles()`,
`_attach_bottle_to_gateway()`. The shared control flow + error policy live in
one place so a backend can't drift onto a bespoke loop or a silent skip. Keeps
the reconcile flow + `GatewayAttachResources` out of `backend/base.py` (the
size guardrail) in a dedicated `backend/gateway_attach.py`. New ADR 0006 records
the "shared behaviour in the base backend, subclasses override primitives"
theme.
Fail hard, never skip (the maintainer's direction over the codex review's
skip). Any attach failure now aborts bring-up instead of being logged and
skipped: a bottle that silently can't reach the fresh gateway (its egress just
starts failing TLS) is worse than a loud failure. Every bottle is attempted and
the failures are raised together (aggregate `InfraLaunchError`) so one bring-up
surfaces the full blast radius. Resource gathering (the CA fetch) also fails
hard. PRD 0081 goal + design updated to match (reversed from the earlier
"tolerate per-bottle failures" draft).
Bumps the base.py guardrail cap 580->600 for the new contract surface (the
delegator + 3 abstract primitives); the flow itself lives in gateway_attach.py.
Refs #516, #519.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Surface the metric ADR 0004 says matters — the critical security/logic
core, currently 95% — as a README badge, distinct from the
informational global `coverage` badge.
- scripts/critical-modules.txt: single source of truth for the core
module list. scripts/coverage.sh now reads it (instead of a hardcoded
string) and update-badges.yml reads the same file, so the badge and
the `critical` report cannot drift.
- update-badges.yml: a `core coverage` step reuses the unit-coverage
data (every core module is unit-tested, so unit-only is accurate for
it) and sed-updates the new badge, like the existing ones.
- README: `core coverage 95%` badge linking to ADR 0004 so a reader can
find out what "core" means.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NkwFXLFff9PYPy4wgVBJp9
Adopt ADR 0004: stop chasing a single global coverage number and
measure what matters instead.
- Omit the genuinely-interactive `cli/init.py` shell (read_tty_line
prompt loops) alongside the existing `cli/tui.py`, with a rationale
comment in .coveragerc. Subprocess/backend orchestration is NOT
omitted — it stays visible and is scored via the integration suite.
- scripts/coverage.sh runs unit + integration under one coverage
measurement (the policy's yardstick) and can report the critical
security/logic core held to the >=90% target.
- scripts/diff_coverage.py is a stdlib-only gate (no diff-cover dep):
new/changed executable lines must be >=90% covered. This is the
enforced regression guard; the global number is informational.
- CI gains a `coverage` job: combined report + the diff-coverage gate.
- Unit-test `cli/__init__.py` dispatch/exit-code mapping (it's logic,
not I/O, so it earns tests rather than an omit).
Combined unit+integration coverage now reports 83% global / 87% across
the critical modules; per-module ratcheting toward 90% is the ongoing
work this policy frames.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NkwFXLFff9PYPy4wgVBJp9
Record that we considered auto-generating an agent's system prompt from
its bottle's egress/git config (so it would know its access up front)
but opted to keep prompts operator-authored: we may want to withhold
that information from the agent directly, and the agent can infer its
access on its own regardless.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
We use Gitea, not an abstract forge. Reword the docs added in this
branch: "forge thread" -> "Gitea thread", and the research note's
generic "forge" -> "Gitea" / "hosting provider" as context demands,
keeping its portability argument coherent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the document-type comparison out of docs/decisions/README.md
(where it only surfaced if you were already in the decisions dir) up
to a new docs/README.md, renamed "When to write which document".
Leave a pointer from the decisions README.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per review on PR #97: an index that lists every ADR is a sync
burden. The files in docs/decisions/ are the index.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add docs/decisions/ with a convention README and back-fill two
decisions that previously had no in-repo home: merging PRs with
rebase (ADR 0001) and the agent-identity claimed-not-vouched trust
posture from PRD 0027 (ADR 0002). Point docs/INDEX.md at it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
didericis-claude
didericis-codex
didericis