docs: name bot-bottle, not ./cli.py, in every instruction
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 11s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 59s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
test / coverage (push) Successful in 21s
test / image-input-builds (push) Successful in 44s
test / image-input-builds (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
test / unit (push) Successful in 57s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 20s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 1m3s
Update Quality Badges / update-badges (push) Successful in 1m12s
test / integration-docker (push) Successful in 1m0s

`doctor` told users to run `./cli.py backend setup`. cli.py is a four-line
wrapper at the repo root that calls bot_bottle.cli:main, and it does not ship —
[tool.setuptools.packages.find] includes only bot_bottle*, so anyone who
installed rather than cloned has no such file. Confirmed against a real
install: the user's tree contains exactly one executable, `bot-bottle`, and no
cli.py anywhere, while doctor recommended `./cli.py` three times. Invisible in
development, where ./cli.py works fine from a checkout, which is why only a
clean-install test surfaced it.

The two entry points are the same code, so the fix is to name the one that
always exists. 141 replacements across 45 files: the runtime messages that
caused this, plus README, docs, PRDs, research notes and test prose, so nothing
teaches the invocation a user cannot run.

scripts/demo.sh is deliberately untouched — it *executes* ./cli.py from a
checkout, where that is the correct and available path.

Verified end to end: a sandbox install now reports
"Run: bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker", and bot-bottle is on
that user's PATH. Unit suite unchanged against the pre-existing baseline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
This commit was merged in pull request #529.
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-27 10:20:17 -04:00
parent 5c499d290b
commit cd9f023f3d
45 changed files with 135 additions and 135 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ end-to-end runner that would catch the *next* macOS-only launch regression.)
PR #470 (#414) already made the integration suite backend-agnostic:
`skip_unless_selected_backend_available()` gates on the *selected* backend's
own `is_backend_ready()` rather than `docker_available()`, and each
integration job runs `./cli.py backend status --backend=<name>` as a preflight
integration job runs `bot-bottle backend status --backend=<name>` as a preflight
that fails loudly when the backend is missing. That is the machinery this job
plugs into; this PRD supplies the runner and the job.
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ Modeled on `integration-firecracker`:
- `concurrency: { group: integration-macos-infra, cancel-in-progress: false }`
to serialize runs against the singleton.
- **Preflight** — `command -v container`, `container system status`, then
`./cli.py backend status --backend=macos-container`; any failure exits
`bot-bottle backend status --backend=macos-container`; any failure exits
non-zero so a misprovisioned runner fails loudly instead of silently
skipping.
- Run the integration suite under coverage with