docs: name bot-bottle, not ./cli.py, in every instruction
prd-number-check / require-numbered-prds (pull_request) Successful in 11s
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 59s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
test / coverage (push) Successful in 21s
test / image-input-builds (push) Successful in 44s
test / image-input-builds (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
test / unit (push) Successful in 57s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 20s
lint / lint (push) Successful in 1m3s
Update Quality Badges / update-badges (push) Successful in 1m12s
test / integration-docker (push) Successful in 1m0s

`doctor` told users to run `./cli.py backend setup`. cli.py is a four-line
wrapper at the repo root that calls bot_bottle.cli:main, and it does not ship —
[tool.setuptools.packages.find] includes only bot_bottle*, so anyone who
installed rather than cloned has no such file. Confirmed against a real
install: the user's tree contains exactly one executable, `bot-bottle`, and no
cli.py anywhere, while doctor recommended `./cli.py` three times. Invisible in
development, where ./cli.py works fine from a checkout, which is why only a
clean-install test surfaced it.

The two entry points are the same code, so the fix is to name the one that
always exists. 141 replacements across 45 files: the runtime messages that
caused this, plus README, docs, PRDs, research notes and test prose, so nothing
teaches the invocation a user cannot run.

scripts/demo.sh is deliberately untouched — it *executes* ./cli.py from a
checkout, where that is the correct and available path.

Verified end to end: a sandbox install now reports
"Run: bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker", and bot-bottle is on
that user's PATH. Unit suite unchanged against the pre-existing baseline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WEfZZhakx13bxTfXcZCoS5
This commit was merged in pull request #529.
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-27 10:20:17 -04:00
parent 5c499d290b
commit cd9f023f3d
45 changed files with 135 additions and 135 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ generation.
The privileged network setup (TAP pool + nft table) is a one-time
operator step — see `netpool.py`, `scripts/firecracker-netpool.sh`,
and `./cli.py backend setup --backend=firecracker`.
and `bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker`.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
@@ -132,18 +132,18 @@ def _require_network_pool() -> None:
f"{netpool.pool_size()} slots) overlaps existing routes: "
f"{detail}. This can shadow or be shadowed by that route; "
f"set BOT_BOTTLE_FC_IP_BASE to a free range and re-run "
f"./cli.py backend setup --backend=firecracker.")
f"bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker.")
missing = netpool.missing_taps()
if missing:
die(f"network pool incomplete — missing TAP devices: "
f"{', '.join(missing)}.\n ./cli.py backend setup --backend=firecracker")
f"{', '.join(missing)}.\n bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker")
if shutil.which("nft") is not None and not netpool.nft_table_present():
# nft is queryable and says the table is absent — that's a
# definite, catchable misconfiguration; fail early.
warn(f"isolation table `inet {netpool.NFT_TABLE}` not found via nft. "
"If this is a permissions issue it will be re-checked "
"empirically after boot; otherwise run: "
"./cli.py backend setup --backend=firecracker")
"bot-bottle backend setup --backend=firecracker")
# --- rootfs pipeline (rootless) -------------------------------------