refactor: unify component naming — control_plane/control_auth -> orchestrator
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 46s
lint / lint (push) Failing after 54s
test / integration-firecracker (pull_request) Successful in 3m21s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / publish-infra (pull_request) Has been skipped
tracker-policy-pr / check-pr (pull_request) Successful in 14s
test / integration-docker (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / unit (pull_request) Successful in 46s
lint / lint (push) Failing after 54s
test / integration-firecracker (pull_request) Successful in 3m21s
test / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 18s
test / publish-infra (pull_request) Has been skipped
The codebase used "control plane" both as an architectural role term AND
as an identifier alias for the orchestrator component, producing
duplicate names for one thing (control_plane_url vs orchestrator_url,
CONTROL_PLANE_PORT, host_control_plane_token, …). Going forward the
concrete component is always named for what it is — Gateway or
Orchestrator — and the plane vocabulary is reserved for prose (module
descriptions, the security argument).
Renamed (identifiers + the in-repo env/wire/file string values, all
setters/getters are in this repo so the change is atomic):
ControlPlaneServer -> OrchestratorServer
control_plane_url -> orchestrator_url
probe_control_plane_url -> probe_orchestrator_url
host_control_plane_token -> host_orchestrator_token
CONTROL_PLANE_PORT -> ORCHESTRATOR_PORT
CONTROL_PLANE_TOKEN_ENV/FILE -> ORCHESTRATOR_TOKEN_ENV/FILENAME
BOT_BOTTLE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOKEN-> BOT_BOTTLE_ORCHESTRATOR_TOKEN
control-plane-token (file) -> orchestrator-token
control_auth (module) -> orchestrator_auth (stays top-level;
the gateway imports it and must not
import the orchestrator/ package)
CONTROL_AUTH_HEADER -> ORCHESTRATOR_AUTH_HEADER
x-bot-bottle-control-auth -> x-bot-bottle-orchestrator-auth
CONTROL_AUTH_JWT_ENV -> ORCHESTRATOR_AUTH_JWT_ENV
BOT_BOTTLE_CONTROL_AUTH_JWT -> BOT_BOTTLE_ORCHESTRATOR_AUTH_JWT
_control_auth_headers -> _orchestrator_auth_headers
Prose plane-terms ("control plane", "data plane") are preserved,
including the test name test_data_plane_daemons_get_jwt_not_key (it
names the security invariant). Gateway and orchestrator verified to
agree on the renamed wire header; full unit suite green (2243).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ import os
|
||||
import time
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
from ...control_auth import ROLE_GATEWAY, mint
|
||||
from ...orchestrator_auth import ROLE_GATEWAY, mint
|
||||
from .util import run_docker
|
||||
from ...paths import (
|
||||
CONTROL_AUTH_JWT_ENV,
|
||||
host_control_plane_token,
|
||||
ORCHESTRATOR_AUTH_JWT_ENV,
|
||||
host_orchestrator_token,
|
||||
host_gateway_ca_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from ...gateway import (
|
||||
@@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ class DockerGateway(Gateway):
|
||||
# a `cli` token, so a compromised data-plane process can't drive the
|
||||
# operator routes (issue #469 review). Bare `--env NAME` keeps the value
|
||||
# off argv / `docker inspect`; only the gateway (not the agent) is given it.
|
||||
argv += ["--env", CONTROL_AUTH_JWT_ENV]
|
||||
run_env[CONTROL_AUTH_JWT_ENV] = mint(ROLE_GATEWAY, host_control_plane_token())
|
||||
argv += ["--env", ORCHESTRATOR_AUTH_JWT_ENV]
|
||||
run_env[ORCHESTRATOR_AUTH_JWT_ENV] = mint(ROLE_GATEWAY, host_orchestrator_token())
|
||||
argv.append(self.image_ref)
|
||||
proc = run_docker(argv, env=run_env)
|
||||
if proc.returncode != 0:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user