refactor: rename platform abstraction to backend
test / run tests/run_tests.py (pull_request) Successful in 21s
test / run tests/run_tests.py (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Across the package: - claude_bottle/platform/ -> claude_bottle/backend/ - platform/docker/platform.py -> backend/docker/backend.py - class BottlePlatform -> BottleBackend - class DockerBottlePlatform -> DockerBottleBackend - get_bottle_platform() -> get_bottle_backend() - env var CLAUDE_BOTTLE_PLATFORM -> CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND - dict _PLATFORMS -> _BACKENDS "Backend" is shorter and more established as the term for a pluggable strategy-pattern implementation. "Platform" was vague (could mean OS, hardware, cloud) and mildly redundant — Docker is itself a platform. The previous PRD section claiming "the Backend protocol was rejected" referred to a low-level run/exec/cp/network_connect protocol; the name was never the reason. The PRD is updated to describe that rejected design by shape rather than by name. The bottle/agent concepts and the manifest schema are unchanged.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import argparse
|
||||
|
||||
from ..platform import get_bottle_platform
|
||||
from ..backend import get_bottle_backend
|
||||
from ..manifest import Manifest
|
||||
from ._common import PROG, USER_CWD
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,5 +20,5 @@ def cmd_list(argv: list[str]) -> int:
|
||||
print(name)
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
|
||||
get_bottle_platform().list_active()
|
||||
get_bottle_backend().list_active()
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user