refactor: rename platform abstraction to backend
test / run tests/run_tests.py (pull_request) Successful in 21s
test / run tests/run_tests.py (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Across the package: - claude_bottle/platform/ -> claude_bottle/backend/ - platform/docker/platform.py -> backend/docker/backend.py - class BottlePlatform -> BottleBackend - class DockerBottlePlatform -> DockerBottleBackend - get_bottle_platform() -> get_bottle_backend() - env var CLAUDE_BOTTLE_PLATFORM -> CLAUDE_BOTTLE_BACKEND - dict _PLATFORMS -> _BACKENDS "Backend" is shorter and more established as the term for a pluggable strategy-pattern implementation. "Platform" was vague (could mean OS, hardware, cloud) and mildly redundant — Docker is itself a platform. The previous PRD section claiming "the Backend protocol was rejected" referred to a low-level run/exec/cp/network_connect protocol; the name was never the reason. The PRD is updated to describe that rejected design by shape rather than by name. The bottle/agent concepts and the manifest schema are unchanged.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
|
||||
from ..platform import get_bottle_platform
|
||||
from ..backend import get_bottle_backend
|
||||
from ..log import info
|
||||
from ._common import read_tty_line
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_cleanup(_argv: list[str]) -> int:
|
||||
platform = get_bottle_platform()
|
||||
plan = platform.prepare_cleanup()
|
||||
backend = get_bottle_backend()
|
||||
plan = backend.prepare_cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
if plan.empty:
|
||||
info("no claude-bottle resources to clean up")
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ def cmd_cleanup(_argv: list[str]) -> int:
|
||||
info("aborted")
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
|
||||
platform.cleanup(plan)
|
||||
backend.cleanup(plan)
|
||||
info("done")
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user