fix(sidecars): per-daemon pipelock restart keeps supervise socket alive
`apply_allowlist_change` used `docker restart <bundle>` to make
pipelock reload, which bounced ALL four daemons — including
supervise, whose MCP socket the agent's claude-code client had
open. That dropped the connection. A second apply works because
supervise has come back up by then.
Fix: per-daemon restart via SIGUSR1.
- New `_Supervisor.restart_daemon(name)` terminates one named
child and spawns a replacement in place. Other daemons keep
running.
- main() wires SIGUSR1 → `restart_daemon("pipelock")`. Pipelock
has no in-process reload, so this is its analog of egress's
SIGHUP-reload-addon path. Pipelock is the only daemon that
currently needs hot-config reload via restart; if others
acquire the need, add a new signal.
- `apply_allowlist_change` now `docker kill --signal USR1
<bundle>` instead of `docker restart`. Supervise / egress /
git-gate keep running across the apply.
Tests:
- New `_Supervisor.restart_daemon` cases: replaces in place
(different pid post-restart, sibling daemon unchanged),
unknown name is a no-op, restart-during-shutdown is a no-op.
- `test_pipelock_apply` rewritten to bring up the bundle image
with `CLAUDE_BOTTLE_SIDECAR_DAEMONS=pipelock` so the
supervisor is PID 1 and handles SIGUSR1. The previous
standalone-pipelock setup wouldn't survive SIGUSR1 (pipelock
default disposition is terminate). Test builds the bundle
image in setUpClass (cached layers make repeat runs fast).
531 tests passing locally (unit + integration).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ Used by the supervise dashboard when the operator approves a
|
||||
pipelock-block proposal (or runs the operator-initiated `pipelock
|
||||
edit <bottle>` verb). Fetches the current pipelock.yaml via `docker
|
||||
exec`, parses it, swaps the api_allowlist with the proposed hosts,
|
||||
re-renders, writes back via `docker cp`, then `docker restart` so
|
||||
re-renders, writes back via the bind-mount path, then signals the
|
||||
bundle supervisor to restart the pipelock daemon (`docker kill
|
||||
--signal USR1`) so
|
||||
pipelock picks up the new config.
|
||||
|
||||
v1 uses restart, not SIGHUP — pipelock has no in-process reload
|
||||
@@ -130,19 +132,17 @@ def apply_allowlist_change(
|
||||
2. Fetch + parse current pipelock.yaml.
|
||||
3. Replace api_allowlist with the proposed hosts; re-render.
|
||||
4. Write the new yaml to the bind-mount source.
|
||||
5. `docker restart` the bundle so pipelock reloads.
|
||||
|
||||
The restart bounces ALL four daemons inside the bundle, not
|
||||
just pipelock — pipelock has no in-process reload and the
|
||||
bundle init re-spawns the four daemons on container restart.
|
||||
Per-daemon reload would need a supervisor IPC channel (PRD
|
||||
0024 open question 1's "eventually" path); the bundle-wide
|
||||
restart is the v1 trade-off.
|
||||
5. `docker kill --signal USR1 <bundle>` so the supervisor
|
||||
restarts the pipelock daemon in place (leaving egress,
|
||||
git-gate, and supervise running). Pipelock has no
|
||||
in-process reload; the supervisor's per-daemon restart
|
||||
keeps the agent's MCP socket alive — a whole-bundle
|
||||
`docker restart` would bounce supervise too.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns (before, after) where both are one-per-line allowlist
|
||||
strings (operator-facing format). Raises PipelockApplyError on
|
||||
any failure; the sidecar's existing config stays in place until
|
||||
the host write succeeds, and the restart is what makes it
|
||||
the host write succeeds, and the SIGUSR1 is what makes it
|
||||
live."""
|
||||
new_hosts = parse_allowlist_content(new_allowlist_content)
|
||||
container = sidecar_bundle_container_name(slug)
|
||||
@@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ def apply_allowlist_change(
|
||||
# FILE — same Docker single-file inode issue as egress_apply:
|
||||
# write-temp-then-rename swaps the host inode and leaves the
|
||||
# container's mount pointing at the orphaned old one. Write
|
||||
# in-place. `docker restart` below picks up the new content
|
||||
# (and pipelock has no in-process reload anyway, so the
|
||||
# restart is what makes it live regardless of write atomicity).
|
||||
# in-place. The SIGUSR1 below makes the new content live
|
||||
# (pipelock has no in-process reload, so the supervisor
|
||||
# restarts the pipelock daemon in response).
|
||||
target = _pipelock_yaml_host_path(slug)
|
||||
target.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
|
||||
target.write_text(rendered)
|
||||
@@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ def apply_allowlist_change(
|
||||
# fine — but 0o600 matches what prepare wrote.
|
||||
target.chmod(0o600)
|
||||
restart = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["docker", "restart", container],
|
||||
["docker", "kill", "--signal", "USR1", container],
|
||||
capture_output=True, text=True, check=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if restart.returncode != 0:
|
||||
raise PipelockApplyError(
|
||||
f"failed to restart {container}: "
|
||||
f"failed to signal {container} for pipelock restart: "
|
||||
f"{(restart.stderr or '').strip()}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user